Adelup wants to get youth informed of DEIS
Posted: Jan 27, 2010 2:55 PM
Updated: Jan 27, 2010 2:55 PM
by Sabrina Salas Matanane
Guam - The Governor's Office, in conjunction with Guam public broadcast station KGTF and the Bureau of Statistics and Plans is spearheading efforts to get Guam's youth involved in sifting through the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Director Tony Lamorena says their mission is to engage high school students in discussions about the military buildup because these individuals are going to be a part of the workforce when the movement of U.S. Marines to Guam occurs.
Lamorena said, "We want them to be a part of the process. We want to hear their comments, what their issues are and what their concerns are. What we're doing is on February 5, we're hosting an event. We're working with the Department of Education and all the private schools to identify because of space availability, a number of students at their respective schools."
From February 8-10, Lamorena says local officials from agencies involved in natural resources and the environment will be at various campuses around the island to educate the youth about the impacts as a result of the buildup.
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Bordallo plans her own DEIS sessions
Bordallo plans her own DEIS sessions
Posted: Jan 27, 2010 2:47 PM
Updated: Jan 27, 2010 2:47 PM
by Heather Hauswirth
Guam - Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo will hold five town hall meetings on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement this weekend. The first is scheduled for Saturday from 10 to noon at the University of Guam's Business and Public Administration Building.
A first come/first served system will be in place for those interested in providing comments at the town hall meetings, according to the following schedule:
Saturday, January 30, 2010
* 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. - University of Guam Jesus & Eugenia Leon
Guerrero Business and Public Administration Building
* 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. - Tamuning Senior Citizens Center
* 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. - Yigo Gymnasium
Sunday, January 31, 2010
* 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. - Agat Community Center
* 5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. - Our Lady of Assumption Church Social Hall, Piti
Posted: Jan 27, 2010 2:47 PM
Updated: Jan 27, 2010 2:47 PM
by Heather Hauswirth
Guam - Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo will hold five town hall meetings on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement this weekend. The first is scheduled for Saturday from 10 to noon at the University of Guam's Business and Public Administration Building.
A first come/first served system will be in place for those interested in providing comments at the town hall meetings, according to the following schedule:
Saturday, January 30, 2010
* 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. - University of Guam Jesus & Eugenia Leon
Guerrero Business and Public Administration Building
* 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. - Tamuning Senior Citizens Center
* 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. - Yigo Gymnasium
Sunday, January 31, 2010
* 2:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. - Agat Community Center
* 5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. - Our Lady of Assumption Church Social Hall, Piti
Agriculture groups have DEIS briefing
Agriculture groups have DEIS briefing
Posted: Jan 27, 2010 2:08 PM
Updated: Jan 27, 2010 2:08 PM
by Michele Catahay
Guam - A Draft Environmental Impact Statement briefing was held this morning with the Legislative Natural Resources Committee. The hearing provided an opportunity for officials with the Guam Fishermen's Co-Op, the Guam Organization of Saltwater and Anglers, the Guam Farmer's Co-Op and the Department of Agriculture to voice the concerns they have with the plans in the DEIS.
Fisherman's Co-Op President Manny Duenas expressed his disappointment with the military's plans to use the eastern side of the island for their firing range. "How you going to tell fishermen to keep out of that zone when fishermen go to the eastern side of the island, that's a safety issue. So that means that zone either has to be constantly closed and prohibited access or somebody's going to have to stand out there with a military boat to tell the fishermen you can't pass through or you can't fish in this zone, we're operating," he said.
Posted: Jan 27, 2010 2:08 PM
Updated: Jan 27, 2010 2:08 PM
by Michele Catahay
Guam - A Draft Environmental Impact Statement briefing was held this morning with the Legislative Natural Resources Committee. The hearing provided an opportunity for officials with the Guam Fishermen's Co-Op, the Guam Organization of Saltwater and Anglers, the Guam Farmer's Co-Op and the Department of Agriculture to voice the concerns they have with the plans in the DEIS.
Fisherman's Co-Op President Manny Duenas expressed his disappointment with the military's plans to use the eastern side of the island for their firing range. "How you going to tell fishermen to keep out of that zone when fishermen go to the eastern side of the island, that's a safety issue. So that means that zone either has to be constantly closed and prohibited access or somebody's going to have to stand out there with a military boat to tell the fishermen you can't pass through or you can't fish in this zone, we're operating," he said.
PaCom boss: Vote not setback to moving Futenma
PaCom boss: Vote not setback to moving Futenma
Audrey McAvoy - The Associated Press
Posted : Tuesday Jan 26, 2010 21:03:24 EST
CAMP H.M. SMITH, Hawaii — The election of a mayor who opposes moving a U.S. air field to his Japanese town isn’t a setback to efforts to fulfill a 2006 bilateral agreement to relocate the base, the top U.S. military commander in the Pacific said Tuesday.
On Sunday, voters in the town of Nago on Okinawa elected base opponent Susumu Inamine as mayor over incumbent Yoshikazu Shimabukuro. Inamine had campaigned against any expansion of U.S. military presence in the area and won with 52.3 percent of the vote.
Adm. Robert F. Willard said he believes more issues than just the Marine air field contributed to the mayor’s election.
“There’s probably a broader set of questions and a broader analysis that is appropriate to determine who won the election and why,” Willard said. “I don’t think it should be regarded as a setback.”
Still, Willard said the U.S. has “a good amount of work to do” to explain the importance of the U.S.-Japan alliance to the Japanese people.
“We bear a responsibility to share that message with them and to encourage the Japanese government, as well as to share with their people the importance of the alliance — why it exists and what benefits all of Asia derives from it,” Willard said.
Washington and Tokyo agreed in 2006 to reorganize U.S. troops in Japan, including moving 8,000 Marines to the U.S. territory of Guam, as a way to lighten the burden on Okinawa.
Part of that plan involves relocating Marine Corps Air Station Futenma to the northern part of the island where it is less congested.
The newly elected government of Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama has vowed to re-examine the decision to move Futenma to Nago. Some of Hatoyama’s Cabinet members said they want the base moved off Japanese territory entirely, a sentiment shared by many residents there.
His foreign minister this month pledged that Tokyo would determine the future of Futenma by May in a way that would have “minimal impact on the U.S.-Japan alliance.”
Under a security pact signed in 1960, U.S. armed forces are allowed broad use of Japanese land and facilities. In return, the U.S. is obliged to respond to attacks on Japan and protect the country under its nuclear umbrella.
Willard showed some patience for the new Japanese administration as it works out a solution for the base, saying it was “pretty natural” to have the new government “come in with a questioning attitude” and challenge assumptions.
“There’s no question there’s a new administration in Japan, and that the United States is getting acquainted with that new administration and so am I,” Willard said.
The admiral said the military-to-military relationship between the two nations was as strong as it’s ever been.
Shortly after speaking to reporters, Willard joined a videoconference with Japanese military leaders to discuss a bilateral exercise called “Keen Edge ‘10” involving hundreds of U.S. and Japanese personnel in the two countries.
The six-day exercise, which ends Wednesday, is designed to increase combat readiness and the interoperability of the two militaries.
Audrey McAvoy - The Associated Press
Posted : Tuesday Jan 26, 2010 21:03:24 EST
CAMP H.M. SMITH, Hawaii — The election of a mayor who opposes moving a U.S. air field to his Japanese town isn’t a setback to efforts to fulfill a 2006 bilateral agreement to relocate the base, the top U.S. military commander in the Pacific said Tuesday.
On Sunday, voters in the town of Nago on Okinawa elected base opponent Susumu Inamine as mayor over incumbent Yoshikazu Shimabukuro. Inamine had campaigned against any expansion of U.S. military presence in the area and won with 52.3 percent of the vote.
Adm. Robert F. Willard said he believes more issues than just the Marine air field contributed to the mayor’s election.
“There’s probably a broader set of questions and a broader analysis that is appropriate to determine who won the election and why,” Willard said. “I don’t think it should be regarded as a setback.”
Still, Willard said the U.S. has “a good amount of work to do” to explain the importance of the U.S.-Japan alliance to the Japanese people.
“We bear a responsibility to share that message with them and to encourage the Japanese government, as well as to share with their people the importance of the alliance — why it exists and what benefits all of Asia derives from it,” Willard said.
Washington and Tokyo agreed in 2006 to reorganize U.S. troops in Japan, including moving 8,000 Marines to the U.S. territory of Guam, as a way to lighten the burden on Okinawa.
Part of that plan involves relocating Marine Corps Air Station Futenma to the northern part of the island where it is less congested.
The newly elected government of Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama has vowed to re-examine the decision to move Futenma to Nago. Some of Hatoyama’s Cabinet members said they want the base moved off Japanese territory entirely, a sentiment shared by many residents there.
His foreign minister this month pledged that Tokyo would determine the future of Futenma by May in a way that would have “minimal impact on the U.S.-Japan alliance.”
Under a security pact signed in 1960, U.S. armed forces are allowed broad use of Japanese land and facilities. In return, the U.S. is obliged to respond to attacks on Japan and protect the country under its nuclear umbrella.
Willard showed some patience for the new Japanese administration as it works out a solution for the base, saying it was “pretty natural” to have the new government “come in with a questioning attitude” and challenge assumptions.
“There’s no question there’s a new administration in Japan, and that the United States is getting acquainted with that new administration and so am I,” Willard said.
The admiral said the military-to-military relationship between the two nations was as strong as it’s ever been.
Shortly after speaking to reporters, Willard joined a videoconference with Japanese military leaders to discuss a bilateral exercise called “Keen Edge ‘10” involving hundreds of U.S. and Japanese personnel in the two countries.
The six-day exercise, which ends Wednesday, is designed to increase combat readiness and the interoperability of the two militaries.
The Impasse over U.S. Bases on Okinawa
The Impasse over U.S. Bases on Okinawa
By Nicholas Szechenyi
Jan 26, 2010
Q1: How did this impasse come about?
A1: In 2006, the United States and Japan reached an agreement on the realignment of U.S. forces in Japan, including the relocation of U.S. forces on the island of Okinawa. The latter involved a package to transfer 8,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam and thereby reduce the burden of the U.S. troop presence on Okinawa residents. The package included a plan to close the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station at Futenma, located in an urban area in central Okinawa, and build a replacement facility in a less populated area on the northern end of the island near the town of Nago. In February 2009, the United States and Japan signed an agreement formally authorizing the Guam transfer and the construction of a replacement facility for Futenma. But Japan’s new prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama, had pledged to reexamine the agreement during an election campaign last summer and felt obligated to put the realignment process on hold after taking office last fall. The Obama administration has stated its desire to implement the agreement as soon as possible but resigned itself to the new government’s review of the issue.
Q2: What is behind the decision of the Japanese government to review the agreement?
A2: Last August, Hatoyama and his Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) engineered a landslide victory in elections for the Lower House of Japan’s Diet (parliament) and formed a coalition government with two smaller parties whose support he needs to pass a budget in the current legislative session and deliver votes in Upper House elections this summer. One of the coalition partners, the Social Democratic Party (SDP), opposes the relocation plan for Futenma and insists the base be moved outside Japan. Last month the SDP threatened to quit the ruling coalition if the government did not support its position, a testament to the complicated domestic political calculations surrounding this issue. On a broader level, the decision to review the agreement arguably stems from a desire by the DPJ to distance itself from the policies of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which until last summer had ruled nearly uninterrupted since 1955.
Q3: Where do things stand now?
A3: The Hatoyama government floated various alternatives to the current relocation plan for Futenma before announcing in December that a decision would be postponed until May of this year, after consultations with coalition partners. On January 24 the residents of Nago, a small town of approximately 60,000, elected a mayor who opposes the current agreement and vows to prevent the new facility from being built there. Prime Minister Hatoyama has repeatedly stressed the need to hear the concerns of Okinawa residents, and the outcome of the Nago mayoral election could therefore factor into his decisionmaking. A panel established by the central government continues to study the Futenma issue.
Q4: How about Japanese public opinion?
A4: A poll published by the Yomiuri newspaper on January 11 found 44 percent of the public in favor of the existing relocation plan for Futenma, with 30 percent suggesting it be moved out of the country and 13 percent wanting it moved out of Okinawa prefecture. A December 21 Mainichi newspaper survey revealed 51 percent of the public disapproved of Prime Minister Hatoyama’s announcement to delay a decision on the Okinawa base issue.
Q5: How engaged are the U.S. and Japanese governments?
A5: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada in Hawaii on January 12 and reiterated the conviction that the existing agreement is the best way forward but that the United States respects the process undertaken by the Hatoyama government. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell will lead a delegation to Japan in early February to continue consultations on this issue.
Q6: Could this have an impact on U.S.-Japan relations?
A6: January 19 marked the 50th anniversary of the signing of the U.S.-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security, in which the United States committed to defend Japan in exchange for U.S. access to bases for the maintenance of peace and security in the Far East. The security alliance is a core pillar of the bilateral relationship, and it is important that the Futenma issue be resolved so that the two governments can move forward. Until the Hatoyama government finally decides how it wants to proceed, observers are left wondering whether the current impasse is merely a product of complicated domestic politics in Japan or a preview of fundamental disagreements that could introduce a period of uncertainty in U.S.-Japan relations.
Nicholas Szechenyi is deputy director and fellow with the Office of the Japan Chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.
By Nicholas Szechenyi
Jan 26, 2010
Q1: How did this impasse come about?
A1: In 2006, the United States and Japan reached an agreement on the realignment of U.S. forces in Japan, including the relocation of U.S. forces on the island of Okinawa. The latter involved a package to transfer 8,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam and thereby reduce the burden of the U.S. troop presence on Okinawa residents. The package included a plan to close the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station at Futenma, located in an urban area in central Okinawa, and build a replacement facility in a less populated area on the northern end of the island near the town of Nago. In February 2009, the United States and Japan signed an agreement formally authorizing the Guam transfer and the construction of a replacement facility for Futenma. But Japan’s new prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama, had pledged to reexamine the agreement during an election campaign last summer and felt obligated to put the realignment process on hold after taking office last fall. The Obama administration has stated its desire to implement the agreement as soon as possible but resigned itself to the new government’s review of the issue.
Q2: What is behind the decision of the Japanese government to review the agreement?
A2: Last August, Hatoyama and his Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) engineered a landslide victory in elections for the Lower House of Japan’s Diet (parliament) and formed a coalition government with two smaller parties whose support he needs to pass a budget in the current legislative session and deliver votes in Upper House elections this summer. One of the coalition partners, the Social Democratic Party (SDP), opposes the relocation plan for Futenma and insists the base be moved outside Japan. Last month the SDP threatened to quit the ruling coalition if the government did not support its position, a testament to the complicated domestic political calculations surrounding this issue. On a broader level, the decision to review the agreement arguably stems from a desire by the DPJ to distance itself from the policies of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which until last summer had ruled nearly uninterrupted since 1955.
Q3: Where do things stand now?
A3: The Hatoyama government floated various alternatives to the current relocation plan for Futenma before announcing in December that a decision would be postponed until May of this year, after consultations with coalition partners. On January 24 the residents of Nago, a small town of approximately 60,000, elected a mayor who opposes the current agreement and vows to prevent the new facility from being built there. Prime Minister Hatoyama has repeatedly stressed the need to hear the concerns of Okinawa residents, and the outcome of the Nago mayoral election could therefore factor into his decisionmaking. A panel established by the central government continues to study the Futenma issue.
Q4: How about Japanese public opinion?
A4: A poll published by the Yomiuri newspaper on January 11 found 44 percent of the public in favor of the existing relocation plan for Futenma, with 30 percent suggesting it be moved out of the country and 13 percent wanting it moved out of Okinawa prefecture. A December 21 Mainichi newspaper survey revealed 51 percent of the public disapproved of Prime Minister Hatoyama’s announcement to delay a decision on the Okinawa base issue.
Q5: How engaged are the U.S. and Japanese governments?
A5: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada in Hawaii on January 12 and reiterated the conviction that the existing agreement is the best way forward but that the United States respects the process undertaken by the Hatoyama government. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell will lead a delegation to Japan in early February to continue consultations on this issue.
Q6: Could this have an impact on U.S.-Japan relations?
A6: January 19 marked the 50th anniversary of the signing of the U.S.-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security, in which the United States committed to defend Japan in exchange for U.S. access to bases for the maintenance of peace and security in the Far East. The security alliance is a core pillar of the bilateral relationship, and it is important that the Futenma issue be resolved so that the two governments can move forward. Until the Hatoyama government finally decides how it wants to proceed, observers are left wondering whether the current impasse is merely a product of complicated domestic politics in Japan or a preview of fundamental disagreements that could introduce a period of uncertainty in U.S.-Japan relations.
Nicholas Szechenyi is deputy director and fellow with the Office of the Japan Chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.
DOD: Buildup projects proceed: Japan prepares to pay $500M share of cost
DOD: Buildup projects proceed: Japan prepares to pay $500M share of cost
By Dionesis Tamondong • Pacific Daily News • January 27, 2010
The U.S. military is on track to award hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts for military construction projects on Guam, despite Japan's prime minister announcing plans to re-examine its deal with Washington.
"There is no change to our program," said John Jackson, director of the Joint Guam Program Office in charge of coordinating the military buildup on island. "We are planning to award construction contracts for both U.S. and Government of Japan funded projects as soon as the Record of Decision is signed later this year."
Jackson was responding to statements by Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama on Monday that Japan might nix its accord with the U.S., and may wait until May to reach a conclusion on an agreement to relocate Marine troops in Okinawa.
The Obama administration already has expressed frustrations with Tokyo's delays in finalizing the relocation of the Futenma base, saying it is delaying a sweeping realignment plan for U.S. military in the region, including Guam.
But Jackson noted the Japan government has already deposited $336 million for projects on Guam, and officials are preparing to submit a $500 million budget for more projects here as part of Japan's fiscal 2010 budget.
He said the Department of Defense has started to use some of the $336 million funding with the awarding of design contracts.
While the delays may allow the island more time to prepare for the population boom expected with the buildup, it doesn't bode well for those investing or planning to invest in projects expected to profit from the buildup.
Nick Captain, president of the Captain Real Estate Group, said many local investors expected and planned for some delays in the aggressive buildup timeline initially provided.
Local, smaller companies would appreciate a longer-term approach to the buildup, he added.
"The shorter the time period that the buildup occurs in, the less likely it is that any local, small companies will significantly benefit from that buildup," he said.
But for foreign investors, the uncertainties caused by delays likely will result in them being less interested in investing.
"It may also probably lead to a slowdown in the willingness of lenders to close major transactions that perhaps were primarily geared toward the benefits associated with the military buildup," Captain said.
Delays and uncertainties over the buildup don't bode well especially for those who are deep into their investment projects.
"It's a very difficult situation to be in if you already have major projects under way," Captain said.
Kenneth Lujan, branch manager for the Small Business Administration on Guam, said his office has seen an increase in the number of loan applications from small construction companies.
Many are trying to obtain capital or fortify their inventory as they plan to pursue contracts and subcontracts for military construction or service projects. President Obama has approved more than $700 million in military construction projects on Guam this fiscal year.
But if the buildup hits a snag or significant delays, these companies may have to scale down their operations and will have difficulty paying back their loans, Lujan noted.
"They will have to regroup and take a look at their resources," Lujan said, adding his office is prepared to provide technical assistance to applicants who need it.
Guam Chamber of Commerce President David Leddy said the Chamber will "continue to be a voice for our local businesses and an advocate for our community, regardless of the buildup plans."
Defense Secretary Robert Gates in October had said changing the terms of the Futenma relocation is not negotiable. Without the Futenma realignment, there will be no relocation to Guam, he has said.
Regional experts have said Japan's demands are part of its strategic posturing expected with the government talks.
As top-level U.S. and Japan officials continue to work on their disagreements, Sen. Judith Guthertz said she wants Guam to be included in discussions between the two governments regarding plans to relocate Marines to Guam because the island will have to deal with the impact of the population influx.
Guam should no longer be ignored, said Guthertz, chairwoman of the legislative Committee on the Guam Military Buildup.
By Dionesis Tamondong • Pacific Daily News • January 27, 2010
The U.S. military is on track to award hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts for military construction projects on Guam, despite Japan's prime minister announcing plans to re-examine its deal with Washington.
"There is no change to our program," said John Jackson, director of the Joint Guam Program Office in charge of coordinating the military buildup on island. "We are planning to award construction contracts for both U.S. and Government of Japan funded projects as soon as the Record of Decision is signed later this year."
Jackson was responding to statements by Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama on Monday that Japan might nix its accord with the U.S., and may wait until May to reach a conclusion on an agreement to relocate Marine troops in Okinawa.
The Obama administration already has expressed frustrations with Tokyo's delays in finalizing the relocation of the Futenma base, saying it is delaying a sweeping realignment plan for U.S. military in the region, including Guam.
But Jackson noted the Japan government has already deposited $336 million for projects on Guam, and officials are preparing to submit a $500 million budget for more projects here as part of Japan's fiscal 2010 budget.
He said the Department of Defense has started to use some of the $336 million funding with the awarding of design contracts.
While the delays may allow the island more time to prepare for the population boom expected with the buildup, it doesn't bode well for those investing or planning to invest in projects expected to profit from the buildup.
Nick Captain, president of the Captain Real Estate Group, said many local investors expected and planned for some delays in the aggressive buildup timeline initially provided.
Local, smaller companies would appreciate a longer-term approach to the buildup, he added.
"The shorter the time period that the buildup occurs in, the less likely it is that any local, small companies will significantly benefit from that buildup," he said.
But for foreign investors, the uncertainties caused by delays likely will result in them being less interested in investing.
"It may also probably lead to a slowdown in the willingness of lenders to close major transactions that perhaps were primarily geared toward the benefits associated with the military buildup," Captain said.
Delays and uncertainties over the buildup don't bode well especially for those who are deep into their investment projects.
"It's a very difficult situation to be in if you already have major projects under way," Captain said.
Kenneth Lujan, branch manager for the Small Business Administration on Guam, said his office has seen an increase in the number of loan applications from small construction companies.
Many are trying to obtain capital or fortify their inventory as they plan to pursue contracts and subcontracts for military construction or service projects. President Obama has approved more than $700 million in military construction projects on Guam this fiscal year.
But if the buildup hits a snag or significant delays, these companies may have to scale down their operations and will have difficulty paying back their loans, Lujan noted.
"They will have to regroup and take a look at their resources," Lujan said, adding his office is prepared to provide technical assistance to applicants who need it.
Guam Chamber of Commerce President David Leddy said the Chamber will "continue to be a voice for our local businesses and an advocate for our community, regardless of the buildup plans."
Defense Secretary Robert Gates in October had said changing the terms of the Futenma relocation is not negotiable. Without the Futenma realignment, there will be no relocation to Guam, he has said.
Regional experts have said Japan's demands are part of its strategic posturing expected with the government talks.
As top-level U.S. and Japan officials continue to work on their disagreements, Sen. Judith Guthertz said she wants Guam to be included in discussions between the two governments regarding plans to relocate Marines to Guam because the island will have to deal with the impact of the population influx.
Guam should no longer be ignored, said Guthertz, chairwoman of the legislative Committee on the Guam Military Buildup.
Officials foresee more problems
Officials foresee more problems
By Dionesis Tamondong • Pacific Daily News • January 27, 2010
The traffic on Guam's northern roads is congested already. Community health centers are overwhelmed. And incidents of littering and illegal dumping are persistent problems in the villages.
These are among the issues Guam's mayors deal with constantly, and Dededo Mayor Melissa Savares said she expects these problems to grow with the population boom expected from the pending military buildup.
Savares was among those who spoke at yesterday's legislative hearing on the military buildup.
Officials from the police department, Guam's court system, corrections department, customs agency and the Guam Preservation Trust also spoke about the concerns facing their respective agencies when the buildup takes place.
The hearings are being held at the Legislature to allow residents to share their concerns and provide comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement. The document details the military's plans and potential impact to the island in regard to the buildup.
As part of the series of hearings, the Committee on Utilities, Transportation and Public Works today will present a briefing by Guam's utility agencies.
The hearing is scheduled for 6 to 9 p.m. at the session hall.
By Dionesis Tamondong • Pacific Daily News • January 27, 2010
The traffic on Guam's northern roads is congested already. Community health centers are overwhelmed. And incidents of littering and illegal dumping are persistent problems in the villages.
These are among the issues Guam's mayors deal with constantly, and Dededo Mayor Melissa Savares said she expects these problems to grow with the population boom expected from the pending military buildup.
Savares was among those who spoke at yesterday's legislative hearing on the military buildup.
Officials from the police department, Guam's court system, corrections department, customs agency and the Guam Preservation Trust also spoke about the concerns facing their respective agencies when the buildup takes place.
The hearings are being held at the Legislature to allow residents to share their concerns and provide comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement. The document details the military's plans and potential impact to the island in regard to the buildup.
As part of the series of hearings, the Committee on Utilities, Transportation and Public Works today will present a briefing by Guam's utility agencies.
The hearing is scheduled for 6 to 9 p.m. at the session hall.
Hirano says gov't could take legal step to settle U.S. base issue
Hirano says gov't could take legal step to settle U.S. base issue
Jan 26 09:57 AM US/Eastern
(AP) - TOKYO, Jan. 26 (Kyodo) — Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi Hirano indicated Tuesday that the government could resort to legal action to settle the issue of where to move a U.S. Marine base in Okinawa if it could not secure consent from the local government that has jurisdiction over a relocation site.
Hirano also said the government does not necessarily have to obtain a local government's consent in reaching a conclusion on where to move the Futemma Air Station by the self-imposed end-of-May deadline.
The remarks could provoke a sharp reaction from local governments in the southernmost prefecture because they could be taken to mean that the central government may proceed to build U.S. military facilities without the consent of local governments.
"There could be a case in which it (the base relocation) could be legally implemented," the top government spokesman said at a news conference. "There are various scenarios."
During a separate news conference, he also indicated a hope that there will be a way to "move things forward without an agreement."
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama later dismissed the possibility of seeking legal action to settle the issue, telling reporters, "Although I don't know what the chief Cabinet secretary meant by the remark, I will seek acceptance (of the government's decision) without adopting a high-handed manner."
Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada also hastened to clarify Hirano's remarks, telling a news conference, "It would be wrong if they were taken to mean that we (the government) would proceed by ignoring local views or without listening to local views at all."
Hirano has already drawn fire from coalition partners in Hatoyama's government for saying that there is "no reason why we have to take that (the election result) into account" in considering where to relocate the Futemma base in Ginowan.
His recent remarks are certain to provoke misgivings from the Social Democratic Party, one such partner, which seeks to move Futemma outside of Okinawa or abroad, and from local governments in the prefecture, complicating his job as chairman of a government panel aimed at exploring an alternative to the existing plan.
The panel, which also considers the existing plan as an option, draws its members from lawmakers in the ministries concerned and the policy chiefs of the SDP and the People's New Party, the other coalition partner in the Democratic Party of Japan-led government.
Meanwhile, Hatoyama expressed his willingness to meet with Susumu Inamine, who won Sunday's mayoral election in Nago, Okinawa, advocating opposition to Futemma's planned relocation to his less densely populated city under an existing deal between Japan and the United States.
"I want to meet with people when I can, whether they are mayors or governors," the prime minister told reporters in the evening.
Inamine criticized Hirano's remark, telling Kyodo News, "I don't understand his intention when he said he doesn't take it (Inamine's victory) into account." "The election result is the popular will and should be respected," the mayor-elect added.
Within the ruling bloc, a group of lawmakers from Okinawa decided Tuesday to call on the government in protest to give up the existing relocation plan.
Kantoku Teruya, an SDP lawmaker in the House of Representatives from Okinawa, said Hirano's remarks lacked common sense, calling the current government the same as the previous one led by the Liberal Democratic Party for its tendency to ignore local people's wishes.
Earlier in the day, Hirano reiterated that the government will not exclude from consideration the existing relocation plan just because a candidate opposed to it won Sunday's local election.
"I have said the introduction of a new mayor and his remarks are one manifestation of the popular will," Hirano said at a news conference. But "that does not mean we should perceive it entirely the popular will on the base issue, which is part of national security," he said.
"It's not that I take the popular will lightly, but in my view the mayoral election was not fought only on that one (issue)," the top government spokesman added.
Hirano pledged that the government will reach a conclusion on Futemma's relocation site, while at the same time seeking understanding from local governments. "To proceed while obtaining understanding from local governments is the precondition," he said.
Tokyo is reviewing the existing relocation plan to draw a conclusion on the issue by the end of May, while the United States has pressed Japan to proceed with the plan on the grounds that it is the only viable option.
Inamine, who will assume the mayoral post on Feb. 8, said Monday he will seek passage of a resolution opposing Futemma's relocation to his city. In the closely watched election, the 64-year-old beat incumbent Mayor Yoshikazu Shimabukuro, who had expressed his willingness to accept the relocation.
Jan 26 09:57 AM US/Eastern
(AP) - TOKYO, Jan. 26 (Kyodo) — Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi Hirano indicated Tuesday that the government could resort to legal action to settle the issue of where to move a U.S. Marine base in Okinawa if it could not secure consent from the local government that has jurisdiction over a relocation site.
Hirano also said the government does not necessarily have to obtain a local government's consent in reaching a conclusion on where to move the Futemma Air Station by the self-imposed end-of-May deadline.
The remarks could provoke a sharp reaction from local governments in the southernmost prefecture because they could be taken to mean that the central government may proceed to build U.S. military facilities without the consent of local governments.
"There could be a case in which it (the base relocation) could be legally implemented," the top government spokesman said at a news conference. "There are various scenarios."
During a separate news conference, he also indicated a hope that there will be a way to "move things forward without an agreement."
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama later dismissed the possibility of seeking legal action to settle the issue, telling reporters, "Although I don't know what the chief Cabinet secretary meant by the remark, I will seek acceptance (of the government's decision) without adopting a high-handed manner."
Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada also hastened to clarify Hirano's remarks, telling a news conference, "It would be wrong if they were taken to mean that we (the government) would proceed by ignoring local views or without listening to local views at all."
Hirano has already drawn fire from coalition partners in Hatoyama's government for saying that there is "no reason why we have to take that (the election result) into account" in considering where to relocate the Futemma base in Ginowan.
His recent remarks are certain to provoke misgivings from the Social Democratic Party, one such partner, which seeks to move Futemma outside of Okinawa or abroad, and from local governments in the prefecture, complicating his job as chairman of a government panel aimed at exploring an alternative to the existing plan.
The panel, which also considers the existing plan as an option, draws its members from lawmakers in the ministries concerned and the policy chiefs of the SDP and the People's New Party, the other coalition partner in the Democratic Party of Japan-led government.
Meanwhile, Hatoyama expressed his willingness to meet with Susumu Inamine, who won Sunday's mayoral election in Nago, Okinawa, advocating opposition to Futemma's planned relocation to his less densely populated city under an existing deal between Japan and the United States.
"I want to meet with people when I can, whether they are mayors or governors," the prime minister told reporters in the evening.
Inamine criticized Hirano's remark, telling Kyodo News, "I don't understand his intention when he said he doesn't take it (Inamine's victory) into account." "The election result is the popular will and should be respected," the mayor-elect added.
Within the ruling bloc, a group of lawmakers from Okinawa decided Tuesday to call on the government in protest to give up the existing relocation plan.
Kantoku Teruya, an SDP lawmaker in the House of Representatives from Okinawa, said Hirano's remarks lacked common sense, calling the current government the same as the previous one led by the Liberal Democratic Party for its tendency to ignore local people's wishes.
Earlier in the day, Hirano reiterated that the government will not exclude from consideration the existing relocation plan just because a candidate opposed to it won Sunday's local election.
"I have said the introduction of a new mayor and his remarks are one manifestation of the popular will," Hirano said at a news conference. But "that does not mean we should perceive it entirely the popular will on the base issue, which is part of national security," he said.
"It's not that I take the popular will lightly, but in my view the mayoral election was not fought only on that one (issue)," the top government spokesman added.
Hirano pledged that the government will reach a conclusion on Futemma's relocation site, while at the same time seeking understanding from local governments. "To proceed while obtaining understanding from local governments is the precondition," he said.
Tokyo is reviewing the existing relocation plan to draw a conclusion on the issue by the end of May, while the United States has pressed Japan to proceed with the plan on the grounds that it is the only viable option.
Inamine, who will assume the mayoral post on Feb. 8, said Monday he will seek passage of a resolution opposing Futemma's relocation to his city. In the closely watched election, the 64-year-old beat incumbent Mayor Yoshikazu Shimabukuro, who had expressed his willingness to accept the relocation.
Japan’s dilly-dally, Guam’s opportunity
Japan’s dilly-dally, Guam’s opportunity
Wednesday, 27 January 2010 05:32
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
WITH the recent declaration made by Nago Okinawa Prefecure mayor-elect Susumu Inamine about his opposition to having U.S. bases in Okinawa, Guam gets the opportunity to be included in the new discussions between Japan and the United States regarding Marines’ relocation plan, Sen. Judith Guthretz said yesterday.
The chair of the legislative committee on military buildup explained that the election of anti-U.S. base candidate Inamine earlier this month has virtually ended the possibility of relocating the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, as previously agreed upon in a bilateral accord between the U.S. and Japan.
“This change in leadership in Okinawa is an opportunity for the United States to finally address the concerns of the island community with regard to the impending military buildup,” Guthertz said.
Possible voiding
She added that the dynamics of Japan’s current political landscape gives credence to the probability of a delay or nullification of the accord and the proposed relocation of Marines to Guam because of the movement of the Futenma Marine contingent to Nago.
Japan Prime Minister Hatoyama has seemingly acquiesced to Inamine’s view stating that “The country will start from scratch on this issue and take responsibility.”
Moreover, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has stated that without the move from Futenma there will be no move to Guam.
Guthertz explained that it just makes sense to include the concerns of the people of Guam who will absorb the entirety of the buildup impact. During the initial discussion on the proposed buildup Guam was totally ignored, she said.
Workable approach
Guthertz explained that this is not a workable approach and noted that this sentiment is reflected in the current fallout of support for the buildup as the island citizenry reacts to the draft environment impact statement.
“It is becoming more and more apparent among the people of Guam that the proposed buildup is for too many too soon, and is coming too quickly,” said Guthertz. “In Guam, the public sentiment for the buildup is rapidly shifting from positive to negative as the details in the [draft study] are being understood.
Guthertz offers an alternative to the U.S. government via a comment paper in response to the draft study. She will dub her paper, “Stretching and Spreading the Buildup,” over a over a more manageable and acceptable timeframe.
Guthertz cited a prior commitment made by then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney in 1990 pledging that the Pentagon would conduct prior consultations with the government of Guam regarding any desired change in the military footprint in Guam.
The Pentagon is breaking that solemn promise, she said. “No discussions were held with the Government of Guam prior to the determination of the relocation of Marines, and Guam had no input on the size or speed of the buildup.”
Attention
“We have never been told who and what determined that the relocation would be for 8,652 Marines, and this is wrong! The people of Guam must be heard, there must be collaboration in this process with our island community,” she added.
She said if neither the U.S. federal government nor the government of Japan agrees fund local needs, Guam “will end up in the disastrous situation of having two Guams: a first-world Guam inside the military fences, and third-world Guam outside the fences.”
Wednesday, 27 January 2010 05:32
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
WITH the recent declaration made by Nago Okinawa Prefecure mayor-elect Susumu Inamine about his opposition to having U.S. bases in Okinawa, Guam gets the opportunity to be included in the new discussions between Japan and the United States regarding Marines’ relocation plan, Sen. Judith Guthretz said yesterday.
The chair of the legislative committee on military buildup explained that the election of anti-U.S. base candidate Inamine earlier this month has virtually ended the possibility of relocating the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, as previously agreed upon in a bilateral accord between the U.S. and Japan.
“This change in leadership in Okinawa is an opportunity for the United States to finally address the concerns of the island community with regard to the impending military buildup,” Guthertz said.
Possible voiding
She added that the dynamics of Japan’s current political landscape gives credence to the probability of a delay or nullification of the accord and the proposed relocation of Marines to Guam because of the movement of the Futenma Marine contingent to Nago.
Japan Prime Minister Hatoyama has seemingly acquiesced to Inamine’s view stating that “The country will start from scratch on this issue and take responsibility.”
Moreover, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has stated that without the move from Futenma there will be no move to Guam.
Guthertz explained that it just makes sense to include the concerns of the people of Guam who will absorb the entirety of the buildup impact. During the initial discussion on the proposed buildup Guam was totally ignored, she said.
Workable approach
Guthertz explained that this is not a workable approach and noted that this sentiment is reflected in the current fallout of support for the buildup as the island citizenry reacts to the draft environment impact statement.
“It is becoming more and more apparent among the people of Guam that the proposed buildup is for too many too soon, and is coming too quickly,” said Guthertz. “In Guam, the public sentiment for the buildup is rapidly shifting from positive to negative as the details in the [draft study] are being understood.
Guthertz offers an alternative to the U.S. government via a comment paper in response to the draft study. She will dub her paper, “Stretching and Spreading the Buildup,” over a over a more manageable and acceptable timeframe.
Guthertz cited a prior commitment made by then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney in 1990 pledging that the Pentagon would conduct prior consultations with the government of Guam regarding any desired change in the military footprint in Guam.
The Pentagon is breaking that solemn promise, she said. “No discussions were held with the Government of Guam prior to the determination of the relocation of Marines, and Guam had no input on the size or speed of the buildup.”
Attention
“We have never been told who and what determined that the relocation would be for 8,652 Marines, and this is wrong! The people of Guam must be heard, there must be collaboration in this process with our island community,” she added.
She said if neither the U.S. federal government nor the government of Japan agrees fund local needs, Guam “will end up in the disastrous situation of having two Guams: a first-world Guam inside the military fences, and third-world Guam outside the fences.”
Still no word on Guam demands
Still no word on Guam demands
Wednesday, 27 January 2010 05:22
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
COMPACT impact reimbursements, the military buildup, war reparations and political self-determination seem to be very touchy subjects in Washington D.C. but all Sen. Frank Blas Jr. wants to know is why Congressman Nick Rahall won't make a statement on compact impact after he had promised to do so.
During a congressional delegation visit to Guam in August last year, Blas was told that the congressman had a prepared statement regarding the matter and that he would be making it at some point during his visit.
Immediately after Rahall made his presentation during one of the lecture series held at the University of Guam, Blas asked one of Rahall's senior staff members about the promised discussion on Compact Impact. “I was informed then that a decision was made not to discuss the matter and that I was not to be told as to why,” said Blas.
Blas had brought this issue to the attention of Congresswoman Madeleine Z. Bordallo who assured him that a response will be forthcoming. However, Blas has yet to receive any response.
“I believe there has been sufficient time to gain a response as to why the Compact issue was not discussed during Mr. Rahall's visit and would appreciate an answer as promised,” wrote Blas to Bordallo.
Wednesday, 27 January 2010 05:22
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
COMPACT impact reimbursements, the military buildup, war reparations and political self-determination seem to be very touchy subjects in Washington D.C. but all Sen. Frank Blas Jr. wants to know is why Congressman Nick Rahall won't make a statement on compact impact after he had promised to do so.
During a congressional delegation visit to Guam in August last year, Blas was told that the congressman had a prepared statement regarding the matter and that he would be making it at some point during his visit.
Immediately after Rahall made his presentation during one of the lecture series held at the University of Guam, Blas asked one of Rahall's senior staff members about the promised discussion on Compact Impact. “I was informed then that a decision was made not to discuss the matter and that I was not to be told as to why,” said Blas.
Blas had brought this issue to the attention of Congresswoman Madeleine Z. Bordallo who assured him that a response will be forthcoming. However, Blas has yet to receive any response.
“I believe there has been sufficient time to gain a response as to why the Compact issue was not discussed during Mr. Rahall's visit and would appreciate an answer as promised,” wrote Blas to Bordallo.
PNC :: Well Known Environmentalist to Address Climate Change Impact On Guam
PNC :: Well Known Environmentalist to Address Climate Change Impact On Guam
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - Jose Ma. Lorenzo “Lory” Tan, CEO and Vice Chairman of WWF-Philippines (World Wildlife Fund), will discuss the impacts of climate change on Guam and Micronesia. At the invitation of Sen. James Espaldon, Mr. Tan will be a
1. UOG guest lecturer on Thursday, Jan. 28 at 6 PM in the Jesus and Eugenia Leon Guerrero CBPA Building,
2. Guam Visitors Bureau Membership Luncheon guest speaker on Friday, Jan. 29 at 11:30 AM, Pacific Islands Club, and
3. Father Duenas Memorial School speaker to 9th and 10th graders.
“Mr. Tan delivered a powerful presentation on climate change and its impacts on tourism during an eco-tourism conference I attended in Manila. Visualizing the disaster that would affect many Asian destinations, I felt it was important to bring Lory on island to give a similar presentation that focuses on Guam and Micronesia,” said Senator Espaldon. Mr. Tan examines how Guam and the region will be affected by climate change, its impact on low lying areas as well as potential impacts to consider with the Guam build-up.
“I inquired during a DEIS briefing whether the impacts of climate change was considered in the military’s planning stages and the answer was no. It is alarming that we are investing billions to meet the military’s growth demands but did not even consider the repercussions of global warming and the potential of seeing hundreds of millions of dollars of infrastructure improvements go underwater in the future,” said Espaldon. It was because of this that Espaldon invited Tan to Guam. Espaldon added, “Global warming and the rising water levels are already affecting Guam and parts of Micronesia.”
Please see the attached biography for more information on Mr. Tan. For additional details on Mr. Tan’s visit, please contact Senator Espaldon at 475-5437.
Written by : News Release
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - Jose Ma. Lorenzo “Lory” Tan, CEO and Vice Chairman of WWF-Philippines (World Wildlife Fund), will discuss the impacts of climate change on Guam and Micronesia. At the invitation of Sen. James Espaldon, Mr. Tan will be a
1. UOG guest lecturer on Thursday, Jan. 28 at 6 PM in the Jesus and Eugenia Leon Guerrero CBPA Building,
2. Guam Visitors Bureau Membership Luncheon guest speaker on Friday, Jan. 29 at 11:30 AM, Pacific Islands Club, and
3. Father Duenas Memorial School speaker to 9th and 10th graders.
“Mr. Tan delivered a powerful presentation on climate change and its impacts on tourism during an eco-tourism conference I attended in Manila. Visualizing the disaster that would affect many Asian destinations, I felt it was important to bring Lory on island to give a similar presentation that focuses on Guam and Micronesia,” said Senator Espaldon. Mr. Tan examines how Guam and the region will be affected by climate change, its impact on low lying areas as well as potential impacts to consider with the Guam build-up.
“I inquired during a DEIS briefing whether the impacts of climate change was considered in the military’s planning stages and the answer was no. It is alarming that we are investing billions to meet the military’s growth demands but did not even consider the repercussions of global warming and the potential of seeing hundreds of millions of dollars of infrastructure improvements go underwater in the future,” said Espaldon. It was because of this that Espaldon invited Tan to Guam. Espaldon added, “Global warming and the rising water levels are already affecting Guam and parts of Micronesia.”
Please see the attached biography for more information on Mr. Tan. For additional details on Mr. Tan’s visit, please contact Senator Espaldon at 475-5437.
Written by : News Release
PNC :: Economist Discusses Recession After Buildup
PNC :: Economist Discusses Recession After Buildup
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - The Economic development subcommittee held a public meeting this afternoon on the economic impacts of the military buildup.
Former GovGuam chief economist Joe Bradley provided the subcommittee with an overview of the economic assessment conducted as part of the military's Draft Environmental Impact Statement. While many have touted the economic benefits of the military buildup the DEIS itself states that the boom of the buildup will be followed by a recession. It's referred to in the DEIS as the "boomtown effect."
Bradley says that this recession after the boom may lead to local families again leaving island for better opportunities elsewhere. He says that a similar thing happened after Guam's tourism boom and history has shown on that when this happens it's not the rich or poor that leaves but the middle class.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - The Economic development subcommittee held a public meeting this afternoon on the economic impacts of the military buildup.
Former GovGuam chief economist Joe Bradley provided the subcommittee with an overview of the economic assessment conducted as part of the military's Draft Environmental Impact Statement. While many have touted the economic benefits of the military buildup the DEIS itself states that the boom of the buildup will be followed by a recession. It's referred to in the DEIS as the "boomtown effect."
Bradley says that this recession after the boom may lead to local families again leaving island for better opportunities elsewhere. He says that a similar thing happened after Guam's tourism boom and history has shown on that when this happens it's not the rich or poor that leaves but the middle class.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
PNC :: We Are Guahan Urges Public to Attend Legislature's DEIS Hearings
PNC :: We Are Guahan Urges Public to Attend Legislature's DEIS Hearings
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - We are Guahan member Victoria Leon Guerrero says that last nights DEIS hearings held by the legislature were much different than the hearings held by the Joint Guam Program Office and the hearings held by the Governor's office.
According to Leon Guerrero the legislature's hearings provided the public with both an opportunity to speak as long as they wanted and the ability to ask questions from a panel of GovGuam officials. Leon Guerrero says last night DOE Superintendant Nerissa Bretania Underwood and GCC president Mary Okada were both on hand to answer questions about the impacts the military buildup will have on education.
Leon Guerrero says that the public was able to learn about the educations needs as a result of the buildup for example the need for about a thousand new teachers.
She adds that the legislature made a great effort of responding to what the community felt was lacking from previous hearings. She encourages everyone to show up to the hearings which will last until the end of the week.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - We are Guahan member Victoria Leon Guerrero says that last nights DEIS hearings held by the legislature were much different than the hearings held by the Joint Guam Program Office and the hearings held by the Governor's office.
According to Leon Guerrero the legislature's hearings provided the public with both an opportunity to speak as long as they wanted and the ability to ask questions from a panel of GovGuam officials. Leon Guerrero says last night DOE Superintendant Nerissa Bretania Underwood and GCC president Mary Okada were both on hand to answer questions about the impacts the military buildup will have on education.
Leon Guerrero says that the public was able to learn about the educations needs as a result of the buildup for example the need for about a thousand new teachers.
She adds that the legislature made a great effort of responding to what the community felt was lacking from previous hearings. She encourages everyone to show up to the hearings which will last until the end of the week.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
PNC :: Sen. Guthertz Wants Guam "At The Table" In Japan U.S. Base Discussions
PNC :: Sen. Guthertz Wants Guam "At The Table" In Japan U.S. Base Discussions
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - Sen. Judi Guthertz, DPA said she wants Guam brought to the table during discussions between Japan and the United States regarding plans to relocate Marines from Okinawa to Guam.
The Chair of the legislative Committee on the Guam Military Buildup explained that the election of anti-U.S. base candidate Susumu Inamine earlier this month as mayor of Nago, Okinawa Prefecture, has virtually ended the possibility of relocating the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, as previously agreed upon in a bilateral accord between the U.S. and Japan.
“This change in leadership in Okinawa is an opportunity for the United States to finally address the concerns of the island community with regard to the impending military buildup,” said Guthertz. She added that the dynamics of Japan’s current political landscape gives credence to the probability of a delay or axing altogether of the accord and the proposed relocation of Marines to Guam because of the movement of the Futenma Marine contingent to Nago.
As well, Japan Prime Minister Hatoyama has seemingly acquiesced to Mayor-elect Inamine’s view stating that “The country will start from scratch on this issue and take responsibility.” Moreover, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has stated that without the move from Futenma there will be no move to Guam.
Sen. Guthertz she explained that it just makes sense to include the concerns of the people of Guam who will absorb the entirety of the buildup impact. During the initial discussion on the proposed buildup Guam was totally ignored. Sen. Guthertz explained that this is not a workable approach and noted that this sentiment is reflected in the current fallout of support for the buildup as the island citizenry reacts to the Draft Environment Impact Statement (DEIS).
“It is becoming more and more apparent among the people of Guam that the proposed buildup is for too many too soon, and is coming too quickly,” said Sen. Guthertz. “In Guam, the public sentiment for the buildup is rapidly shifting from positive to negative as the details in the DEIS are being understood.
Tomorrow, Sen. Guthertz will offer an alternative to the United States Government via a comment paper in response to the DEIS. She will dub it “Stretching and Spreading the Buildup,” over a over a more manageable and acceptable timeframe.
In her statement, Sen. Guthertz cites a prior commitment from then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney in 1990 pledging that the Pentagon would conduct prior consultations with the Government of Guam regarding any desired change in the military footprint in Guam.
The Pentagon is breaking that solemn promise. No discussions were held with the Government of Guam prior to the determination of the relocation of Marines, and Guam had no input on the size or speed of the buildup. “We have never been told who and what determined that the relocation would be for 8,652 Marines, and this is wrong! The people of Guam must be heard, there must be collaboration in this process with our island community.”
She concluded, “If either our federal government or the government of Japan does not fund our local needs, we will end up in the disastrous situation of having two Guams: a first-world Guam inside the military fences, and third-world Guam outside the fences.”
Written by : News Release
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - Sen. Judi Guthertz, DPA said she wants Guam brought to the table during discussions between Japan and the United States regarding plans to relocate Marines from Okinawa to Guam.
The Chair of the legislative Committee on the Guam Military Buildup explained that the election of anti-U.S. base candidate Susumu Inamine earlier this month as mayor of Nago, Okinawa Prefecture, has virtually ended the possibility of relocating the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, as previously agreed upon in a bilateral accord between the U.S. and Japan.
“This change in leadership in Okinawa is an opportunity for the United States to finally address the concerns of the island community with regard to the impending military buildup,” said Guthertz. She added that the dynamics of Japan’s current political landscape gives credence to the probability of a delay or axing altogether of the accord and the proposed relocation of Marines to Guam because of the movement of the Futenma Marine contingent to Nago.
As well, Japan Prime Minister Hatoyama has seemingly acquiesced to Mayor-elect Inamine’s view stating that “The country will start from scratch on this issue and take responsibility.” Moreover, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has stated that without the move from Futenma there will be no move to Guam.
Sen. Guthertz she explained that it just makes sense to include the concerns of the people of Guam who will absorb the entirety of the buildup impact. During the initial discussion on the proposed buildup Guam was totally ignored. Sen. Guthertz explained that this is not a workable approach and noted that this sentiment is reflected in the current fallout of support for the buildup as the island citizenry reacts to the Draft Environment Impact Statement (DEIS).
“It is becoming more and more apparent among the people of Guam that the proposed buildup is for too many too soon, and is coming too quickly,” said Sen. Guthertz. “In Guam, the public sentiment for the buildup is rapidly shifting from positive to negative as the details in the DEIS are being understood.
Tomorrow, Sen. Guthertz will offer an alternative to the United States Government via a comment paper in response to the DEIS. She will dub it “Stretching and Spreading the Buildup,” over a over a more manageable and acceptable timeframe.
In her statement, Sen. Guthertz cites a prior commitment from then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney in 1990 pledging that the Pentagon would conduct prior consultations with the Government of Guam regarding any desired change in the military footprint in Guam.
The Pentagon is breaking that solemn promise. No discussions were held with the Government of Guam prior to the determination of the relocation of Marines, and Guam had no input on the size or speed of the buildup. “We have never been told who and what determined that the relocation would be for 8,652 Marines, and this is wrong! The people of Guam must be heard, there must be collaboration in this process with our island community.”
She concluded, “If either our federal government or the government of Japan does not fund our local needs, we will end up in the disastrous situation of having two Guams: a first-world Guam inside the military fences, and third-world Guam outside the fences.”
Written by : News Release
PNC :: Bice Says No Changes in Buildup Plans
PNC :: Bice Says No Changes in Buildup Plans
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - Reports from the Associated Press have some on Guam concerned that the military buildup might not happen at all. Japan's newly elected prime minister Yukio Hatoyama has been quoted as saying he will re-assess the US marine base re-alignment agreement.
According to the Associated Press Japan Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama has plegdged to "start from scratch" in re-examining Japan's military realignment deal with the U.S. this is the same deal that will send at least 8,000 marines and their 9,000 dependents to Guam. In this deal the Futenma marine corps air base is to be moved to a coastal area that is home to the endangered dugong. Locals in Japan have opposed this move citing the effects it will have on the endangered Dugong.
On the other hand the U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has said that the without the Futenma move their will be no movement of marines to Guam. So will this move occur or not? According to a statement released by Joint Guam Program Office Executive Director David Bice no plans have changed. Bice states:
"As you know, Secretary Gates' position re: Futenma replacement facility is firm. In the meantime, we are planning to award construction contracts for both U.S. and GOJ funded projects as soon as the record of decision is signed later this year. You will recall GOJ has deposited $336m for jfy09 (1 apr 09 thru 31 mar 10) for Guam projects--we are managing those funds. we have already started to execute some of those funds with AE (design) contracts."
While gates is firm about moving Futenma some members of Hatoyama's cabinet have suggested that the entire Futenma base be moved to Guam along with 8,000 marines that are already slated to come here. We asked Congresswoman Madeline Bordallo about her thoughts. The Congresswoman replied with the following statement.
“I do not support the relocation of the Futenma replacement facility to Guam. I echo the governor’s sentiment that there is no room for additional military forces above what is outlined in the current draft environmental impact statement."
As far as whether or not Japan and the U.S. will come to an agreement over Futenma the Congresswoman says "When such a review is complete in may we hope that Prime Minister Hatoyama will conclude that the current Futenma replacement facility location as stipulated in the agreement is the best option available.”
So if Japan doesn't budge on Futenma and the US government doesn't budge on Futenma will this stop the movement of marines to Guam? UOG professor of international and comparative politics Dr. Michael Stoil says it probably won't. He says that it shouldn't affect the move of marines to Guam as the military buildup on Guam really has nothing to do with Futenma. According to Dr. Stoil the buildup on Guam is as a result of the Pentagon's "new thinking" which is to set up a command center for the western Pacific on U.S. Soil. Guam is U.S. Soil and in fact is the Western most part of the U.S.
So why is Secretary Gates calling Futenma the lynchpin? Dr. Stoil says Gates is simply politicking. Politicking because the U.S. government doesn't have the money right now to move Futenma off of Okinawa completely. So in the end if Japan doesn't agree to the Futenma move Dr. Stoil says it probably won't change Washington's mind about the Guam buildup but it may delay it until the U.S. can afford it.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - Reports from the Associated Press have some on Guam concerned that the military buildup might not happen at all. Japan's newly elected prime minister Yukio Hatoyama has been quoted as saying he will re-assess the US marine base re-alignment agreement.
According to the Associated Press Japan Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama has plegdged to "start from scratch" in re-examining Japan's military realignment deal with the U.S. this is the same deal that will send at least 8,000 marines and their 9,000 dependents to Guam. In this deal the Futenma marine corps air base is to be moved to a coastal area that is home to the endangered dugong. Locals in Japan have opposed this move citing the effects it will have on the endangered Dugong.
On the other hand the U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has said that the without the Futenma move their will be no movement of marines to Guam. So will this move occur or not? According to a statement released by Joint Guam Program Office Executive Director David Bice no plans have changed. Bice states:
"As you know, Secretary Gates' position re: Futenma replacement facility is firm. In the meantime, we are planning to award construction contracts for both U.S. and GOJ funded projects as soon as the record of decision is signed later this year. You will recall GOJ has deposited $336m for jfy09 (1 apr 09 thru 31 mar 10) for Guam projects--we are managing those funds. we have already started to execute some of those funds with AE (design) contracts."
While gates is firm about moving Futenma some members of Hatoyama's cabinet have suggested that the entire Futenma base be moved to Guam along with 8,000 marines that are already slated to come here. We asked Congresswoman Madeline Bordallo about her thoughts. The Congresswoman replied with the following statement.
“I do not support the relocation of the Futenma replacement facility to Guam. I echo the governor’s sentiment that there is no room for additional military forces above what is outlined in the current draft environmental impact statement."
As far as whether or not Japan and the U.S. will come to an agreement over Futenma the Congresswoman says "When such a review is complete in may we hope that Prime Minister Hatoyama will conclude that the current Futenma replacement facility location as stipulated in the agreement is the best option available.”
So if Japan doesn't budge on Futenma and the US government doesn't budge on Futenma will this stop the movement of marines to Guam? UOG professor of international and comparative politics Dr. Michael Stoil says it probably won't. He says that it shouldn't affect the move of marines to Guam as the military buildup on Guam really has nothing to do with Futenma. According to Dr. Stoil the buildup on Guam is as a result of the Pentagon's "new thinking" which is to set up a command center for the western Pacific on U.S. Soil. Guam is U.S. Soil and in fact is the Western most part of the U.S.
So why is Secretary Gates calling Futenma the lynchpin? Dr. Stoil says Gates is simply politicking. Politicking because the U.S. government doesn't have the money right now to move Futenma off of Okinawa completely. So in the end if Japan doesn't agree to the Futenma move Dr. Stoil says it probably won't change Washington's mind about the Guam buildup but it may delay it until the U.S. can afford it.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
PNC :: JGPO Says No Change Here In Buildup Plans After Hatoyama's Call To "Start From Scratch"
PNC :: JGPO Says No Change Here In Buildup Plans After Hatoyama's Call To "Start From Scratch"
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - JGPO Director and Retired Marine Major General David Bice says there is "no change" in the Joint Guam Program Office's plans for the military buildup here, despite remarks from Japanese Prime Minster Yukio Hatoyama that "its time to start from scratch" over the realignment of U.S. Bases in Okinawa.
The Associated Press reports that Hatoyama made his remarks after Nagano residents elected a new Mayor opposed to the building of a new U.S. base in that Okinawan city.
However Bice this morning telling the K-57 Breakfast Show "Bottom-line up front: No change to our program."
In an email to Brreakfast Show Host Ray Gibson, Bice said "US and Govt of Japan (GOJ) officials continue to discuss the Futenma issue and we are expecting a PM announcement in May. Secretary Gates' position re: Futenma replacement facility is firm."
"In the meantime, we are planning to award construction contracts for both US and GOJ funded projects as soon as the Record of Decision is signed later this year. You will recall GOJ has deposited $336M for JFY09 (1 Apr 09 thru 31 Mar 10) for Guam projects--we are managing those funds."
"We have already started to execute some of those funds with AE (design) contracts. The GOJ is about to submit a previously announced budget request to the Diet of approx $500M for JFY10 projects on Guam. Finally, we continue to plan and coordinate with our GOJ colleagues regarding the requirements and arrangements for GOJ funded SPE housing and upgrades to utilities systems on Guam to support the Marine relocation."
Written by : Kevin Kerrigan
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - JGPO Director and Retired Marine Major General David Bice says there is "no change" in the Joint Guam Program Office's plans for the military buildup here, despite remarks from Japanese Prime Minster Yukio Hatoyama that "its time to start from scratch" over the realignment of U.S. Bases in Okinawa.
The Associated Press reports that Hatoyama made his remarks after Nagano residents elected a new Mayor opposed to the building of a new U.S. base in that Okinawan city.
However Bice this morning telling the K-57 Breakfast Show "Bottom-line up front: No change to our program."
In an email to Brreakfast Show Host Ray Gibson, Bice said "US and Govt of Japan (GOJ) officials continue to discuss the Futenma issue and we are expecting a PM announcement in May. Secretary Gates' position re: Futenma replacement facility is firm."
"In the meantime, we are planning to award construction contracts for both US and GOJ funded projects as soon as the Record of Decision is signed later this year. You will recall GOJ has deposited $336M for JFY09 (1 Apr 09 thru 31 Mar 10) for Guam projects--we are managing those funds."
"We have already started to execute some of those funds with AE (design) contracts. The GOJ is about to submit a previously announced budget request to the Diet of approx $500M for JFY10 projects on Guam. Finally, we continue to plan and coordinate with our GOJ colleagues regarding the requirements and arrangements for GOJ funded SPE housing and upgrades to utilities systems on Guam to support the Marine relocation."
Written by : Kevin Kerrigan
PNC :: Sen Ben Pangelinan with Ray Gibson
PNC :: Sen Ben Pangelinan with Ray Gibson
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Interview between Ray Gibson and Senator Ben Pangelinan about the 30th Guam Legislature's hearings on the Draft EIS for the military buildup. They then talked about the CLTC and the possibility of the military leasing some CLTC controlled lands. They then talked about the Letter of Intent between GBB and the military for the military to become a user of the Layon landfill.
If the player does not work click here to download the entire podcast.
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/stories/k57podcasts/jan10/100126_091913.mp3
Written by : Bob Gaeth
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Interview between Ray Gibson and Senator Ben Pangelinan about the 30th Guam Legislature's hearings on the Draft EIS for the military buildup. They then talked about the CLTC and the possibility of the military leasing some CLTC controlled lands. They then talked about the Letter of Intent between GBB and the military for the military to become a user of the Layon landfill.
If the player does not work click here to download the entire podcast.
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/stories/k57podcasts/jan10/100126_091913.mp3
Written by : Bob Gaeth
PNC :: Senator Respicio Comments on Day 1 of Legislative DEIS Hearings
PNC :: Senator Respicio Comments on Day 1 of Legislative DEIS Hearings
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - Following the first of five nights of hearings scheduled at the Legislature on the military buildup’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Senator Rory Respicio said that the public’s negative sentiment toward the buildup is warranted.
Day one of the legislative hearings on the DEIS and the military buildup in general provided a forum for people to finally speak directly to several of their government leaders. Monday’s hearings were attended by the various education-related agencies who gave brief presentations of their work so far in reviewing the DEIS and made themselves available to answer questions from the public.
The panel of senators also answered as many questions as possible, but there is still an overwhelming sense of frustration because of the lack of information afforded to the general public.
“We were successful at creating an environment in which the people were able to engage their government whether through voicing their concerns or asking questions,” said Respicio. This is a massive military buildup which will change Guam and our island community forever.
Senator Respicio said that the military’s approach is wrong. “The DEIS should also address how the local community will be assisted, but it does not. If the military looks only to secure their needs inside the military base, is this really fair for our people?”
He continued, “We want our people to take advantage of this opportunity to engage their government, but to do so respectfully. As frustrated and passionate as we all may be, we are all trying to find the best way to handle this situation.
Written by : News Release
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Guam - Following the first of five nights of hearings scheduled at the Legislature on the military buildup’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Senator Rory Respicio said that the public’s negative sentiment toward the buildup is warranted.
Day one of the legislative hearings on the DEIS and the military buildup in general provided a forum for people to finally speak directly to several of their government leaders. Monday’s hearings were attended by the various education-related agencies who gave brief presentations of their work so far in reviewing the DEIS and made themselves available to answer questions from the public.
The panel of senators also answered as many questions as possible, but there is still an overwhelming sense of frustration because of the lack of information afforded to the general public.
“We were successful at creating an environment in which the people were able to engage their government whether through voicing their concerns or asking questions,” said Respicio. This is a massive military buildup which will change Guam and our island community forever.
Senator Respicio said that the military’s approach is wrong. “The DEIS should also address how the local community will be assisted, but it does not. If the military looks only to secure their needs inside the military base, is this really fair for our people?”
He continued, “We want our people to take advantage of this opportunity to engage their government, but to do so respectfully. As frustrated and passionate as we all may be, we are all trying to find the best way to handle this situation.
Written by : News Release
Guthertz wants to be part of Japan/US talks
Guthertz wants to be part of Japan/US talks
Posted: Jan 26, 2010 6:34 PM
Updated: Jan 28, 2010 3:33 PM
by Nick Delgado
Guam - Committee Chair on the Military Buildup senator Judith Guthertz says she wants Guam to be part of the discussions between Japan and the United States when it comes to planning the Marine relocation from Okinawa to Guam.
Guthertz says she will offer an alternative to the U.S. government on Wednesday in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement calling it, "Stretching and Spreading the Buildup," over a more manageable and acceptable timeframe. In her statement, Senator Guthertz cites a prior commitment from then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney pledging that the Pentagon would conduct prior consultations with the Government of Guam regarding any desired change in the military footprint in Guam.
Guthertz believes the Pentagon is breaking that solemn promise, as she states no discussions were held with the GovGuam prior to the determination of the relocation of Marines, and Guam had no input on the size or speed of the buildup. "We have never been told who and what determined that the relocation would be for 8,652 Marines, and this is wrong! The people of Guam must be heard, there must be collaboration in this process with our island community."
Guthertz says the buildup is for too many too soon, "If either our federal government or the government of Japan does not fund our local needs, we will end up in the disastrous situation of having two Guam's: a first-world Guam inside the military fences, and third-world Guam outside the fences."
Posted: Jan 26, 2010 6:34 PM
Updated: Jan 28, 2010 3:33 PM
by Nick Delgado
Guam - Committee Chair on the Military Buildup senator Judith Guthertz says she wants Guam to be part of the discussions between Japan and the United States when it comes to planning the Marine relocation from Okinawa to Guam.
Guthertz says she will offer an alternative to the U.S. government on Wednesday in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement calling it, "Stretching and Spreading the Buildup," over a more manageable and acceptable timeframe. In her statement, Senator Guthertz cites a prior commitment from then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney pledging that the Pentagon would conduct prior consultations with the Government of Guam regarding any desired change in the military footprint in Guam.
Guthertz believes the Pentagon is breaking that solemn promise, as she states no discussions were held with the GovGuam prior to the determination of the relocation of Marines, and Guam had no input on the size or speed of the buildup. "We have never been told who and what determined that the relocation would be for 8,652 Marines, and this is wrong! The people of Guam must be heard, there must be collaboration in this process with our island community."
Guthertz says the buildup is for too many too soon, "If either our federal government or the government of Japan does not fund our local needs, we will end up in the disastrous situation of having two Guam's: a first-world Guam inside the military fences, and third-world Guam outside the fences."
Students question officials on DEIS
Students question officials on DEIS
Posted: Jan 25, 2010 10:22 PM PST
by Michele Catahay
Guam - It seems that the military buildup will have a major impact on schools. During the public hearing last night, several public school students questioned officials why they are ill informed about the movement of U.S. Marines to Guam.
Department of Education Superintendent Dr. Nerissa Bretania Underwood says she's been told by secondary and elementary school officials that teachers have been discussing the Draft EIS during history and social studies classes. She says she's hoping to draw together stakeholders to examine the impact.
"We're hoping that in working with the Governor's Office that there will be that youth forum where representatives of our youth throughout the island will actually have the opportunity to voice their concerns and also whatever thoughts they have regarding the potential impacts of the military buildup," she said.
Posted: Jan 25, 2010 10:22 PM PST
by Michele Catahay
Guam - It seems that the military buildup will have a major impact on schools. During the public hearing last night, several public school students questioned officials why they are ill informed about the movement of U.S. Marines to Guam.
Department of Education Superintendent Dr. Nerissa Bretania Underwood says she's been told by secondary and elementary school officials that teachers have been discussing the Draft EIS during history and social studies classes. She says she's hoping to draw together stakeholders to examine the impact.
"We're hoping that in working with the Governor's Office that there will be that youth forum where representatives of our youth throughout the island will actually have the opportunity to voice their concerns and also whatever thoughts they have regarding the potential impacts of the military buildup," she said.
GEDA meeting mulls DEIS
GEDA meeting mulls DEIS
Posted: Jan 25, 2010 10:18 PM PST
by Janjeera Hail
Guam - The Draft Environmental Impact Statement was also the topic of discussion at today's GEDA subcommittee meeting. Bank of Guam Economic and Market Statistics Officer Joseph Bradley gave a presentation, focusing on how the buildup will affect the local workforce.
The DEIS predicts that the number of jobs will rise significantly in 2013 and 2014, but that many of those jobs will disappear once the buildup is complete. "When the project is done, there's no work for them," Bradley surmised. "It may be, there may be very good ways to do it but I don't think we can lose sight of the fact that we're really talking about the community as a whole and not just the impacts on the operations of the government."
Posted: Jan 25, 2010 10:18 PM PST
by Janjeera Hail
Guam - The Draft Environmental Impact Statement was also the topic of discussion at today's GEDA subcommittee meeting. Bank of Guam Economic and Market Statistics Officer Joseph Bradley gave a presentation, focusing on how the buildup will affect the local workforce.
The DEIS predicts that the number of jobs will rise significantly in 2013 and 2014, but that many of those jobs will disappear once the buildup is complete. "When the project is done, there's no work for them," Bradley surmised. "It may be, there may be very good ways to do it but I don't think we can lose sight of the fact that we're really talking about the community as a whole and not just the impacts on the operations of the government."
Legislature continues DEIS hearings
Guam road construction to increase
Posted: Jan 25, 2010 9:02 PM PST
by Janjeera Hail
Guam - Expect more delay when it comes to traffic on Guam's roadways. Department of Public Works Director Larry Perez says with the agency advertising approximately $20,000,000 worth of projects per quarter, he says residents will see road construction increase. Contractors are working on pavement markings, signage, widening and resurfacing in all areas on island.
"The Route 4/Route 10 intersection," described Perez, "we have pavement markings happening down south happening on Marine Corps Drive. We're going to be doing resurfacing on Route 14, Chalan San Antonio. Reconstruction on Route 25. There will be an intersection near the Las Palmas area."
Perez warns residents to drive cautiously and safely through the roadways during the daytime.
Posted: Jan 25, 2010 9:02 PM PST
by Janjeera Hail
Guam - Expect more delay when it comes to traffic on Guam's roadways. Department of Public Works Director Larry Perez says with the agency advertising approximately $20,000,000 worth of projects per quarter, he says residents will see road construction increase. Contractors are working on pavement markings, signage, widening and resurfacing in all areas on island.
"The Route 4/Route 10 intersection," described Perez, "we have pavement markings happening down south happening on Marine Corps Drive. We're going to be doing resurfacing on Route 14, Chalan San Antonio. Reconstruction on Route 25. There will be an intersection near the Las Palmas area."
Perez warns residents to drive cautiously and safely through the roadways during the daytime.
Hearing focuses on education
Hearing focuses on education
By Dionesis Tamondong
Pacific Daily News
January 26, 2010
At the peak of the military buildup in 2014, Guam's Department of Education will need up to six new schools and more than 400 new teachers to accommodate more than 6,200 new students, according to the draft Environmental Impact Statement.
Education officials and lawmakers discussed the challenges anticipated for Guam's public school system with the planned military buildup during a legislative hearing yesterday evening.
The interactive town hall meeting continues today from 4 to 9 p.m. at the Legislature in Hagåtña. Village mayors and officials from the Guam's Customs and Quarantine Agency will be part of today's town hall panel.
While yesterday's hearing focused on education issues, attendees were invited to share any other concerns or suggestions they had in regards to the buildup.
University of Guam President Robert Underwood, Guam Community College President Mary Okada, and Department of Education Superintendent Nerissa Bretania Underwood were among last night's panelists.
Some senators questioned whether Guam's educational institutions will be able to produce the number of teachers needed, and that's on top of existing teacher shortages that plague the school system each year.
Concerns were also raised over whether Guam's university and community college will be able to develop the many needed professionals in other career fields, including health, criminal justice and environment.
The Legislature is urging residents to participate and submit their comments during the hearings this week.
By Dionesis Tamondong
Pacific Daily News
January 26, 2010
At the peak of the military buildup in 2014, Guam's Department of Education will need up to six new schools and more than 400 new teachers to accommodate more than 6,200 new students, according to the draft Environmental Impact Statement.
Education officials and lawmakers discussed the challenges anticipated for Guam's public school system with the planned military buildup during a legislative hearing yesterday evening.
The interactive town hall meeting continues today from 4 to 9 p.m. at the Legislature in Hagåtña. Village mayors and officials from the Guam's Customs and Quarantine Agency will be part of today's town hall panel.
While yesterday's hearing focused on education issues, attendees were invited to share any other concerns or suggestions they had in regards to the buildup.
University of Guam President Robert Underwood, Guam Community College President Mary Okada, and Department of Education Superintendent Nerissa Bretania Underwood were among last night's panelists.
Some senators questioned whether Guam's educational institutions will be able to produce the number of teachers needed, and that's on top of existing teacher shortages that plague the school system each year.
Concerns were also raised over whether Guam's university and community college will be able to develop the many needed professionals in other career fields, including health, criminal justice and environment.
The Legislature is urging residents to participate and submit their comments during the hearings this week.
Japan may shelve US base relocation deal
Japan may shelve US base relocation deal
By Tomoko Hosaka
4:00 AM Tuesday Jan 26, 2010
Japan's Prime Minister said yesterday that he might break a key military deal with Washington on relocating United States troops, after a local election in Okinawa showed residents oppose any new Marine base in their region.
Residents of Nago elected a mayor who is staunchly against moving a base there from a larger city nearby - plans which Washington considers fundamental to its troop realignment in the region.
An agreement on the relocation was made under the previous Government, which lost power last year.
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama said the results of Sunday's election reflected the will of the people, and Japan would completely re-examine its accord with the US. "The country will start from scratch on this issue and take responsibility to reach a conclusion by the end of May," he told reporters.
His Government has repeatedly put off making a decision, risking a rift with the US, its main military ally, in the face of security concerns such as North Korea's nuclear programme and China's rising strength.
Nago chose challenger Susumu Inamine - who campaigned against any expansion of US military presence in the area - over incumbent Yoshikazu Shimabukuro.
Inamine won with 52.3 per cent of the vote, according to the city's election office.
The city's mayor has little say in national policy, but with Japanese parliamentary elections coming midyear, the results quickly reverberated throughout the country.
"It wasn't just Shimabukuro that was defeated in the election. The biggest loser was Japan's postwar military base strategy," the national Asahi daily said in a front-page editorial yesterday.
Japan signed a deal with the US four years ago that was part of a broader realignment of American troops.
A key part of the plan was relocating the Futenma base to the smaller city of Nago, where the latest election was held. The issue sparked intense protests and dominated debate between the two mayoral candidates. Defeated mayor Shimabukuro supported the base for the jobs and investment it would bring.
The Obama Administration has already expressed frustrations with Tokyo's delays in finalising the relocation of the Futenma base - now in the Okinawa city of Ginowan - saying it is delaying a sweeping realignment plan for US military in the region.
By Tomoko Hosaka
4:00 AM Tuesday Jan 26, 2010
Japan's Prime Minister said yesterday that he might break a key military deal with Washington on relocating United States troops, after a local election in Okinawa showed residents oppose any new Marine base in their region.
Residents of Nago elected a mayor who is staunchly against moving a base there from a larger city nearby - plans which Washington considers fundamental to its troop realignment in the region.
An agreement on the relocation was made under the previous Government, which lost power last year.
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama said the results of Sunday's election reflected the will of the people, and Japan would completely re-examine its accord with the US. "The country will start from scratch on this issue and take responsibility to reach a conclusion by the end of May," he told reporters.
His Government has repeatedly put off making a decision, risking a rift with the US, its main military ally, in the face of security concerns such as North Korea's nuclear programme and China's rising strength.
Nago chose challenger Susumu Inamine - who campaigned against any expansion of US military presence in the area - over incumbent Yoshikazu Shimabukuro.
Inamine won with 52.3 per cent of the vote, according to the city's election office.
The city's mayor has little say in national policy, but with Japanese parliamentary elections coming midyear, the results quickly reverberated throughout the country.
"It wasn't just Shimabukuro that was defeated in the election. The biggest loser was Japan's postwar military base strategy," the national Asahi daily said in a front-page editorial yesterday.
Japan signed a deal with the US four years ago that was part of a broader realignment of American troops.
A key part of the plan was relocating the Futenma base to the smaller city of Nago, where the latest election was held. The issue sparked intense protests and dominated debate between the two mayoral candidates. Defeated mayor Shimabukuro supported the base for the jobs and investment it would bring.
The Obama Administration has already expressed frustrations with Tokyo's delays in finalising the relocation of the Futenma base - now in the Okinawa city of Ginowan - saying it is delaying a sweeping realignment plan for US military in the region.
Another buildup snag
Another buildup snag
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:25
by Romeo Carlos | Variety News Staff
Okinawa vote heralds roadblock for Marines move
AT AN early morning breakfast meeting with a group of visiting Japanese and local businessmen news of an election in Okinawa Sunday colored discussions over a planned military-related project funded by the Japanese government.
In yet another setback to plans for transferring 8,000 Marines from Japan to Guam which was set to begin this year, voters in Okinawa elected a mayor on Sunday who campaigned on a promise to oppose the relocation of the Futenma Air Base to Nago from a more crowded part of the southern Japanese island.
“This only complicates things further,” a Japanese representative for a group of contractors preparing ahead of a major construction project to the breakfast workgroup. Like others at the table he asked not to be identified for this story because of the sensitive nature of ongoing talks.
Voters in the Okinawa city of Nago have amped up the pressure on Japan's left-leaning government to nix a 2006 agreement with the U.S. about the base by choosing challenger Susumu Inamine - who campaigned against any expansion of U.S. military presence in the area - over incumbent mayor Yoshikazu Shimabukuro.
Rising concern
“There are real concerns,” said a manpower expert from the Philippines at the morning meeting. “Stringent regulations mean up to six months time to plan for labor recruitment but contractors are shy about committing resources right now, when they should be finalizing things because they are afraid of being stuck too far out if this keeps dragging on like this.”
The leader of the Japanese team of businessmen told Variety, "Our contractors are very nervous because the investments at stake are very large," he said, adding that a lengthy delay could increase the costs of buildup projects by millions.
"We already have projects on the table that will move forward, even with this delay. After that however is questionable," the nervous contractors' representative said. He questioned, "If at the last minute we have the green light the question will be ‘will we have the time to get things ready on Guam and how much will the delay add to project costs?’ These things are going to have to be factored."
Another official associated with the visiting business group said he expected their project activity to create between 160 and 200 local nonconstruction jobs as they begin operations on Guam later this year - that is if things stay on track.
But he and his colleagues fear timelines will have to be pushed back as much as up to 14 months if Tokyo ultimately allows the Marines air force base to move to Nago.
Washington officials have repeatedly said, despite counter claims by officials at the Joint Guam Program Office, calling off the agreement would end plans to transfer the marines and their dependents to Guam.
Economic activity
With a stagnant tourism industry and little else bringing in revenue to the government of Guam, the island is in sore need of the infusion of multibillion dollar construction projects to stir economic activity.
Even without significant measures to assure the government, local businesses and residents capture a greater portion of the windfall that will flow through Guam, government coffers stand to surge by more than $100 million per year.
Moreover, in the event Tokyo and Washington leadership is unable to arrive at an agreement over what to do about the controversial air base it may lead to years of dialog to renegotiate the entire matter, and leaving Guam on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars in infrastructure costs meant to support the demands of increased military presence on the island.
But if the planned buildup tarries much longer or simply never materializes the longterm debt implications are likely to have a worse impact on the island’s future than the planned militarization ever would.
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:25
by Romeo Carlos | Variety News Staff
Okinawa vote heralds roadblock for Marines move
AT AN early morning breakfast meeting with a group of visiting Japanese and local businessmen news of an election in Okinawa Sunday colored discussions over a planned military-related project funded by the Japanese government.
In yet another setback to plans for transferring 8,000 Marines from Japan to Guam which was set to begin this year, voters in Okinawa elected a mayor on Sunday who campaigned on a promise to oppose the relocation of the Futenma Air Base to Nago from a more crowded part of the southern Japanese island.
“This only complicates things further,” a Japanese representative for a group of contractors preparing ahead of a major construction project to the breakfast workgroup. Like others at the table he asked not to be identified for this story because of the sensitive nature of ongoing talks.
Voters in the Okinawa city of Nago have amped up the pressure on Japan's left-leaning government to nix a 2006 agreement with the U.S. about the base by choosing challenger Susumu Inamine - who campaigned against any expansion of U.S. military presence in the area - over incumbent mayor Yoshikazu Shimabukuro.
Rising concern
“There are real concerns,” said a manpower expert from the Philippines at the morning meeting. “Stringent regulations mean up to six months time to plan for labor recruitment but contractors are shy about committing resources right now, when they should be finalizing things because they are afraid of being stuck too far out if this keeps dragging on like this.”
The leader of the Japanese team of businessmen told Variety, "Our contractors are very nervous because the investments at stake are very large," he said, adding that a lengthy delay could increase the costs of buildup projects by millions.
"We already have projects on the table that will move forward, even with this delay. After that however is questionable," the nervous contractors' representative said. He questioned, "If at the last minute we have the green light the question will be ‘will we have the time to get things ready on Guam and how much will the delay add to project costs?’ These things are going to have to be factored."
Another official associated with the visiting business group said he expected their project activity to create between 160 and 200 local nonconstruction jobs as they begin operations on Guam later this year - that is if things stay on track.
But he and his colleagues fear timelines will have to be pushed back as much as up to 14 months if Tokyo ultimately allows the Marines air force base to move to Nago.
Washington officials have repeatedly said, despite counter claims by officials at the Joint Guam Program Office, calling off the agreement would end plans to transfer the marines and their dependents to Guam.
Economic activity
With a stagnant tourism industry and little else bringing in revenue to the government of Guam, the island is in sore need of the infusion of multibillion dollar construction projects to stir economic activity.
Even without significant measures to assure the government, local businesses and residents capture a greater portion of the windfall that will flow through Guam, government coffers stand to surge by more than $100 million per year.
Moreover, in the event Tokyo and Washington leadership is unable to arrive at an agreement over what to do about the controversial air base it may lead to years of dialog to renegotiate the entire matter, and leaving Guam on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars in infrastructure costs meant to support the demands of increased military presence on the island.
But if the planned buildup tarries much longer or simply never materializes the longterm debt implications are likely to have a worse impact on the island’s future than the planned militarization ever would.
Panel to take Guam concerns to D.C.
Panel to take Guam concerns to D.C.
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:15
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
SPEAKER Judi Won Pat will head a Guam delegation to Washington D.C. to bring the local community’s perspectives on the military buildup to members of Congress.
The delegation will include members of the legislature.
Won Pat said she wants to know if public comments will make a difference in the final draft of the environmental impact statement and if the people of Guam be given the opportunity to review and comment on the final report.
The traveling time is crucial, said Won Pat. “We want to leave in February because Congress is still in session and will recess on the 12th and we want to be there before that because if we wait, it'll be too late. There won't be anybody to present our case to,” she said.
Won Pat said she and her colleagues who attended the public hearings on the draft environmental impact statement were deeply troubled by the overwhelmingly negative comments from those who had testified.
Another question lawmakers will ask Congress is whether the people of Guam will have the opportunity to present testimonies after the public comment period ends Feb. 18 on the final draft study. “And nobody can answer that question for us. Not the Matrix Group, not the Joint Guam Program Office,” Won Pat said.
“We we're going to put these oral testimonies on DVD, because we want them to hear and feel the sentiments of the people. They need to understand how frustrating it is to our people,” she added.
The other goal is to present a legislative resolution that will reveal the major concerns and the local community’s sentiments about the buildup, Won Pat said.
Won Pat said she intends to call a one-day session to discuss Resolution 275, which identifies specific elements of great concern that were expressed during the public hearings hosted by Joint Guam Program Office and Gov. Felix Camacho.
The delegation will also present to Congress Resolution 160, which expresses opposition to the possible exercise of eminent domain power for acquisition of public lands.
The speaker's open invitation to her colleagues has garnered interest of Vice Speaker BJ Cruz, Senators Rory Respicio, Judi Guthertz, Frank Blas Jr., who have committed to travel to the nation’s capital as part of the legislative delegation.
Won Pat said she hopes that a majority of her colleagues will join her because now is the time to send out a big message to Congress that “we're not going to take this sitting down. Whatever we can do, we'll do. We must,” said the Speaker. “The governor talks about One vision. One future. One Guam. Let us make it so.”
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:15
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
SPEAKER Judi Won Pat will head a Guam delegation to Washington D.C. to bring the local community’s perspectives on the military buildup to members of Congress.
The delegation will include members of the legislature.
Won Pat said she wants to know if public comments will make a difference in the final draft of the environmental impact statement and if the people of Guam be given the opportunity to review and comment on the final report.
The traveling time is crucial, said Won Pat. “We want to leave in February because Congress is still in session and will recess on the 12th and we want to be there before that because if we wait, it'll be too late. There won't be anybody to present our case to,” she said.
Won Pat said she and her colleagues who attended the public hearings on the draft environmental impact statement were deeply troubled by the overwhelmingly negative comments from those who had testified.
Another question lawmakers will ask Congress is whether the people of Guam will have the opportunity to present testimonies after the public comment period ends Feb. 18 on the final draft study. “And nobody can answer that question for us. Not the Matrix Group, not the Joint Guam Program Office,” Won Pat said.
“We we're going to put these oral testimonies on DVD, because we want them to hear and feel the sentiments of the people. They need to understand how frustrating it is to our people,” she added.
The other goal is to present a legislative resolution that will reveal the major concerns and the local community’s sentiments about the buildup, Won Pat said.
Won Pat said she intends to call a one-day session to discuss Resolution 275, which identifies specific elements of great concern that were expressed during the public hearings hosted by Joint Guam Program Office and Gov. Felix Camacho.
The delegation will also present to Congress Resolution 160, which expresses opposition to the possible exercise of eminent domain power for acquisition of public lands.
The speaker's open invitation to her colleagues has garnered interest of Vice Speaker BJ Cruz, Senators Rory Respicio, Judi Guthertz, Frank Blas Jr., who have committed to travel to the nation’s capital as part of the legislative delegation.
Won Pat said she hopes that a majority of her colleagues will join her because now is the time to send out a big message to Congress that “we're not going to take this sitting down. Whatever we can do, we'll do. We must,” said the Speaker. “The governor talks about One vision. One future. One Guam. Let us make it so.”
Rage over DEIS continues
Rage over DEIS continues
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:13
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
DEBATES on the draft environmental impact statement have not abated as indicated by attendance at last night’s the public hearing hosted by the legislature.
Over 80 participants gathered to reaffirm their opposition to the U.S. military’s plans outlined in the impact statement, expressing doubts the federal government is looking out for the interests of the people of Guam.
Speaker Judi Won Pat said that it didn't matter if people had already spoken at other public hearings sponsored by the Joint Guam Program Office and the Office of the Governor.
Won Pat said all testimonies were recorded and will be presented to members of Congress when a Guam delegation that she will lead heads out to Washington D.C. next month. (See related story)
Won Pat said the legislature's hearings gathered input for possible inclusion in legislation regarding the buildup.
Last night’s hearing focused on the impact of the troop buildup on the Guam Community College and the University of Guam.
This week's hearings were set up as an "interactive town hall" in which participants are given a chance to make a comment, or ask a question to the senators, the agency directors, chairmen of the Civilian-Military Task Force subcommittees, or anyone with expertise on a related topic.
Discussion will not be limited but the topics and agencies indicated will be the focus of that day's hearing, as those directors have confirmed to be in attendance.
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:13
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
DEBATES on the draft environmental impact statement have not abated as indicated by attendance at last night’s the public hearing hosted by the legislature.
Over 80 participants gathered to reaffirm their opposition to the U.S. military’s plans outlined in the impact statement, expressing doubts the federal government is looking out for the interests of the people of Guam.
Speaker Judi Won Pat said that it didn't matter if people had already spoken at other public hearings sponsored by the Joint Guam Program Office and the Office of the Governor.
Won Pat said all testimonies were recorded and will be presented to members of Congress when a Guam delegation that she will lead heads out to Washington D.C. next month. (See related story)
Won Pat said the legislature's hearings gathered input for possible inclusion in legislation regarding the buildup.
Last night’s hearing focused on the impact of the troop buildup on the Guam Community College and the University of Guam.
This week's hearings were set up as an "interactive town hall" in which participants are given a chance to make a comment, or ask a question to the senators, the agency directors, chairmen of the Civilian-Military Task Force subcommittees, or anyone with expertise on a related topic.
Discussion will not be limited but the topics and agencies indicated will be the focus of that day's hearing, as those directors have confirmed to be in attendance.
PNC :: Legislature Holding Its DEIS Hearings This Week
PNC :: Legislature Holding Its DEIS Hearings This Week
Monday, 25 January 2010
Guam - Talks of the military buildup and the draft environmental impact statement continued Monday as the Guam legislature started the first of its 5 public hearing on the Draft EIS on the military buildup. The legislature will hold these public hearings everyday for the rest of this week.
So far the JGPO and the governor's office have both held public hearings on the draft environmental impact statement of the military buildup. Today the legislature begins it's series of public hearings on the DEIS. So what's the difference with these public hearings? One of it's co-organizers Senator Judi Guthertz explains that unlike previous public hearings the legislature will help people submit their comments in the proper format or in the format that the military will accept.
During the governor's workshops that were facilitated by Matrix Design Group participants were told that their comments would have to be written and submitted in the proper format or else the military would simply disregard them. In order to include comments as a part of their EIS the military is requiring that they reference specific areas of the DEIS document.
Senator Respicio says this is why he hopes that the public will come out in full force as they did at the previous hearings. Respicio hopes their hearings will generate comments that can and will be used as part of the Final EIS.
After the legislature finishes it's series of public hearings on the DEIS Speaker Judi Wonpat says that they plan to take the information and testimonies they gather directly to Washington D.C.. the speaker says they hope that the U.S. congress will be able to help answer the many questions the people of Guam have regarding the military buildup.
The Speaker says they are looking at going to Washington on the second week of February between the seventh on the tenth. While she has invited all of her colleagues the Speaker says that so far Vice-Speaker Cruz, Senator Respicio, Senator Guthertz, Senator Pangelinan, and Senator Frank Blas Jr have all expressed interest in joining the delegation.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
Monday, 25 January 2010
Guam - Talks of the military buildup and the draft environmental impact statement continued Monday as the Guam legislature started the first of its 5 public hearing on the Draft EIS on the military buildup. The legislature will hold these public hearings everyday for the rest of this week.
So far the JGPO and the governor's office have both held public hearings on the draft environmental impact statement of the military buildup. Today the legislature begins it's series of public hearings on the DEIS. So what's the difference with these public hearings? One of it's co-organizers Senator Judi Guthertz explains that unlike previous public hearings the legislature will help people submit their comments in the proper format or in the format that the military will accept.
During the governor's workshops that were facilitated by Matrix Design Group participants were told that their comments would have to be written and submitted in the proper format or else the military would simply disregard them. In order to include comments as a part of their EIS the military is requiring that they reference specific areas of the DEIS document.
Senator Respicio says this is why he hopes that the public will come out in full force as they did at the previous hearings. Respicio hopes their hearings will generate comments that can and will be used as part of the Final EIS.
After the legislature finishes it's series of public hearings on the DEIS Speaker Judi Wonpat says that they plan to take the information and testimonies they gather directly to Washington D.C.. the speaker says they hope that the U.S. congress will be able to help answer the many questions the people of Guam have regarding the military buildup.
The Speaker says they are looking at going to Washington on the second week of February between the seventh on the tenth. While she has invited all of her colleagues the Speaker says that so far Vice-Speaker Cruz, Senator Respicio, Senator Guthertz, Senator Pangelinan, and Senator Frank Blas Jr have all expressed interest in joining the delegation.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
PNC :: Senator Respicio Critical of Governor/Congresswoman's Stance on Military Buildup
PNC :: Senator Respicio Critical of Governor/Congresswoman's Stance on Military Buildup
Monday, 25 January 2010
Guam - Today on k-57's breakfast show Senator's Rory Respicio, Judy Wonpat and Judy Guthertz spoke about the legislative public hearings they will hold on the Draft EIS of the military buildup.
During these discussions Senator Respicio was critical of both the governor and congresswoman's representation of guam's position on the military buildup. Senator Respicio says that these public hearings are being held in order to gather comments and better represent the feelings of the people of Guam towards the DEIS and the military buildup.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
Monday, 25 January 2010
Guam - Today on k-57's breakfast show Senator's Rory Respicio, Judy Wonpat and Judy Guthertz spoke about the legislative public hearings they will hold on the Draft EIS of the military buildup.
During these discussions Senator Respicio was critical of both the governor and congresswoman's representation of guam's position on the military buildup. Senator Respicio says that these public hearings are being held in order to gather comments and better represent the feelings of the people of Guam towards the DEIS and the military buildup.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
PNC :: Speaker Judi Won Pat, Sens Judi Guthertz and Rory Respicio with Ray Gibson
Monday, January 25, 2009
Speaker Judi Won Pat, Sens Judi Guthertz and Rory Respicio with Ray Gibson
Interview between Ray Gibson and Speaker Judi Won Pat, Senators Judi Guthertz and Rory Respicion about the public hearings which will be conducted by the 30th Guam Legislature concerning the Draft EIS for the military buildup.
If player does not work click here to download entire podcast.
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/stories/k57podcasts/jan10/100125_083714.mp3
Written by : Bob Gaeth
Speaker Judi Won Pat, Sens Judi Guthertz and Rory Respicio with Ray Gibson Part 2Interview between Ray Gibson and Speaker Judi Won Pat, Senators Judi Guthertz and Rory Respicion about the public hearings which will be conducted by the 30th Guam Legislature concerning the Draft EIS for the military buidup continued.
If the player does not work click here to download entire podcast.
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/stories/k57podcasts/jan10/100125_090028.mp3
Written by : Bob Gaeth
Speaker Judi Won Pat, Sens Judi Guthertz and Rory Respicio with Ray Gibson
Interview between Ray Gibson and Speaker Judi Won Pat, Senators Judi Guthertz and Rory Respicion about the public hearings which will be conducted by the 30th Guam Legislature concerning the Draft EIS for the military buildup.
If player does not work click here to download entire podcast.
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/stories/k57podcasts/jan10/100125_083714.mp3
Written by : Bob Gaeth
Speaker Judi Won Pat, Sens Judi Guthertz and Rory Respicio with Ray Gibson Part 2Interview between Ray Gibson and Speaker Judi Won Pat, Senators Judi Guthertz and Rory Respicion about the public hearings which will be conducted by the 30th Guam Legislature concerning the Draft EIS for the military buidup continued.
If the player does not work click here to download entire podcast.
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/stories/k57podcasts/jan10/100125_090028.mp3
Written by : Bob Gaeth
Mayor's election in Okinawa is setback for U.S. air base move
Mayor's election in Okinawa is setback for U.S. air base move
By Blaine Harden
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 25, 2010
TOKYO -- In a small-town election that may have a big impact on U.S. ties with Japan, voters in Nago on Okinawa chose a new mayor Sunday who opposes the relocation of a noisy U.S. military air base to his town.
Susumu Inamine, who said during his campaign that he did not want the air station constructed in Nago, defeated the incumbent, Yoshikazu Shimabukuro, who has long supported hosting the base as a way of increasing jobs and investment.
"I was campaigning in the election with a pledge not to have a new base built," Inamine told supporters Sunday night.
The United States and Japan agreed four years ago to move the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, now located in a dense urban area in the center of Okinawa, to Nago, a town of 60,000 in the thinly populated northern part of the tropical island. It was to have been built on landfill along a pristine coast on the edge of the town.
But to the exasperation of the Obama administration, that deal was put on hold last fall after the election of a new government led by Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, who says Japan has been too passive in its dealings with the United States. Hatoyama has suggested that the base be moved off Okinawa or out of Japan altogether -- and has also said that the outcome of the mayoral vote in Nago would be a factor in his government's final decision, which he has promised to make by May.
Inamine's anti-base campaign attracted support from environmentalists and from local members of Hatoyama's Democratic Party of Japan and its coalition partners, as well as from the Japanese Communist Party.
Nago's mayor avoided mention of the airbase in his campaign, saying its relocation was not a matter that could or should be decided by him or residents of his city.
That view is shared by U.S. Marine Corps commanders, who view the Futenma air station as a linchpin in the continuous training and on-call mobility of the Third Marine Expeditionary Force, which is based on Okinawa and is the only such U.S. force in the Far East.
"National security policy cannot be made in towns and villages," Lt. Gen. Keith J. Stalder, commander of Marine forces in the Pacific, said in an interview last week.
Relocating the Marine air station to Nago is a key part of a $26 billion deal between Japan and the United States to transfer 8,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam and turn over valuable tracts of land to people on the island. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said last fall that the deal would probably collapse if the air station does not move to Nago.
Several U.S. officials said last week they believe that senior leaders in the Hatoyama government have begun to realize that there is no workable alternative to relocating the air station as previously agreed. They also said that such an important decision should be made in Tokyo and not in a local election.
Construction of the air station in Nago would require a massive landfill in a picturesque stretch of waters now used by fishermen and snorkelers. It is opposed by environmentalists who have filed a lawsuit saying it would destroy habitat of the rare dugong, a manatee-like sea mammal. A Japanese government environmental assessment has said that dugongs have not been seen in the proposed construction area for many years.
For many Okinawans, the Futenma air station has become a symbol of the noise, pollution and risk of accidents that they associate with the large U.S. military presence on the island.
Surrounded by 92,000 people in the city of Ginowan, Futenma torments its neighbors with the comings and going of combat helicopters and transport aircraft.
In 2004, a helicopter based at the airfield crashed into the administration building of a nearby college. There were no deaths, but the incident angered local residents and led to the 2006 agreement to move the air base to Nago.
The vote in Nago does not necessarily kill the relocation of the air station. The final decision is up to the governor of Okinawa, who has shown qualified support for the base relocation plan, and the central government in Tokyo.
By Blaine Harden
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 25, 2010
TOKYO -- In a small-town election that may have a big impact on U.S. ties with Japan, voters in Nago on Okinawa chose a new mayor Sunday who opposes the relocation of a noisy U.S. military air base to his town.
Susumu Inamine, who said during his campaign that he did not want the air station constructed in Nago, defeated the incumbent, Yoshikazu Shimabukuro, who has long supported hosting the base as a way of increasing jobs and investment.
"I was campaigning in the election with a pledge not to have a new base built," Inamine told supporters Sunday night.
The United States and Japan agreed four years ago to move the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, now located in a dense urban area in the center of Okinawa, to Nago, a town of 60,000 in the thinly populated northern part of the tropical island. It was to have been built on landfill along a pristine coast on the edge of the town.
But to the exasperation of the Obama administration, that deal was put on hold last fall after the election of a new government led by Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, who says Japan has been too passive in its dealings with the United States. Hatoyama has suggested that the base be moved off Okinawa or out of Japan altogether -- and has also said that the outcome of the mayoral vote in Nago would be a factor in his government's final decision, which he has promised to make by May.
Inamine's anti-base campaign attracted support from environmentalists and from local members of Hatoyama's Democratic Party of Japan and its coalition partners, as well as from the Japanese Communist Party.
Nago's mayor avoided mention of the airbase in his campaign, saying its relocation was not a matter that could or should be decided by him or residents of his city.
That view is shared by U.S. Marine Corps commanders, who view the Futenma air station as a linchpin in the continuous training and on-call mobility of the Third Marine Expeditionary Force, which is based on Okinawa and is the only such U.S. force in the Far East.
"National security policy cannot be made in towns and villages," Lt. Gen. Keith J. Stalder, commander of Marine forces in the Pacific, said in an interview last week.
Relocating the Marine air station to Nago is a key part of a $26 billion deal between Japan and the United States to transfer 8,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam and turn over valuable tracts of land to people on the island. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said last fall that the deal would probably collapse if the air station does not move to Nago.
Several U.S. officials said last week they believe that senior leaders in the Hatoyama government have begun to realize that there is no workable alternative to relocating the air station as previously agreed. They also said that such an important decision should be made in Tokyo and not in a local election.
Construction of the air station in Nago would require a massive landfill in a picturesque stretch of waters now used by fishermen and snorkelers. It is opposed by environmentalists who have filed a lawsuit saying it would destroy habitat of the rare dugong, a manatee-like sea mammal. A Japanese government environmental assessment has said that dugongs have not been seen in the proposed construction area for many years.
For many Okinawans, the Futenma air station has become a symbol of the noise, pollution and risk of accidents that they associate with the large U.S. military presence on the island.
Surrounded by 92,000 people in the city of Ginowan, Futenma torments its neighbors with the comings and going of combat helicopters and transport aircraft.
In 2004, a helicopter based at the airfield crashed into the administration building of a nearby college. There were no deaths, but the incident angered local residents and led to the 2006 agreement to move the air base to Nago.
The vote in Nago does not necessarily kill the relocation of the air station. The final decision is up to the governor of Okinawa, who has shown qualified support for the base relocation plan, and the central government in Tokyo.
Port review unresolved
Port review unresolved
By Steve Limtiaco • Pacific Daily News • January 25, 2010
It took about five months for the governor's office to give a $350,000 port outreach job to contractor Parsons Brinckerhoff International -- from January 2008, when the military approved funding, to May 2008, when a $350,000 purchase order was issued.
It has taken federal and local officials longer than that to say whether procurement rules were followed.
Guam Assistant Attorney General John Weisenberger has completed his procurement review of the project, and his findings currently are with Chief Deputy Attorney General Phil Tydingco "for further review and final disposition," said attorney general's spokesman Eric Palacios.
The military also has not completed its review of the port project, according to a letter from the military to the Pacific Daily News last week.
AG review began Aug. 3
The attorney general's office started its procurement review Aug. 3. at the request of acting Gov. Mike Cruz, following a series of stories about the outreach project in the Pacific Daily News.
OEA announced its review a few days later and said it froze $350,000 in grant funding to the governor's office -- the value of the project -- pending completion of that review.
Governor's Chief of Staff George Bamba, who is the authorizing official for all OEA grants to the governor's office, approved funding for the port outreach project after the port's legal counsel raised concerns about first putting the job out to bid. The job never went out to bid and was paid for using a $350,000 sole-source purchase order from the governor's office.
The outreach work, which was paid for but never completed, was performed by subcontractor M2D2, which employs Bamba's daughter-in-law and the brother of the port general manager.
Purchases larger than $15,000 normally have to be put out to bid, but the island's chief procurement officer said she approved the larger purchase order based on information provided by Bamba in a memo.
More than $11M in grants approved
The grant agreements signed by Bamba state the grant money must be spent according to federal and local procurement regulations. OEA has approved more than $11 million in grants to the governor's office to help the island prepare for the military buildup.
Bamba, during an interview on K-57 radio in late October, said OEA had completed its review and was waiting for the Guam attorney general's office to release its findings. He said he hoped it would happen within a week.
But OEA has not completed its review, according to the Defense Department.
The Pacific Daily News in November submitted a Freedom of Information request to the military, asking for a copy of the OEA procurement review.
According to the military, OEA Director Patrick O'Brien, who is the "initial denial authority" for his office, was unable to provide the requested documents.
"The OEA informed us that the record you seek is still in production and has not been completed," the military's Office of Freedom of Information stated in a Jan. 14 letter to the Pacific Daily News.
Attorney General Alicia Limtiaco last year recused herself from the review process. Her husband, Vincent Munoz, helped start subcontractor M2D2 in 2007, but Munoz sold his share in the company in April 2008 and did not work on the port outreach project, his attorney has said.
By Steve Limtiaco • Pacific Daily News • January 25, 2010
It took about five months for the governor's office to give a $350,000 port outreach job to contractor Parsons Brinckerhoff International -- from January 2008, when the military approved funding, to May 2008, when a $350,000 purchase order was issued.
It has taken federal and local officials longer than that to say whether procurement rules were followed.
Guam Assistant Attorney General John Weisenberger has completed his procurement review of the project, and his findings currently are with Chief Deputy Attorney General Phil Tydingco "for further review and final disposition," said attorney general's spokesman Eric Palacios.
The military also has not completed its review of the port project, according to a letter from the military to the Pacific Daily News last week.
AG review began Aug. 3
The attorney general's office started its procurement review Aug. 3. at the request of acting Gov. Mike Cruz, following a series of stories about the outreach project in the Pacific Daily News.
OEA announced its review a few days later and said it froze $350,000 in grant funding to the governor's office -- the value of the project -- pending completion of that review.
Governor's Chief of Staff George Bamba, who is the authorizing official for all OEA grants to the governor's office, approved funding for the port outreach project after the port's legal counsel raised concerns about first putting the job out to bid. The job never went out to bid and was paid for using a $350,000 sole-source purchase order from the governor's office.
The outreach work, which was paid for but never completed, was performed by subcontractor M2D2, which employs Bamba's daughter-in-law and the brother of the port general manager.
Purchases larger than $15,000 normally have to be put out to bid, but the island's chief procurement officer said she approved the larger purchase order based on information provided by Bamba in a memo.
More than $11M in grants approved
The grant agreements signed by Bamba state the grant money must be spent according to federal and local procurement regulations. OEA has approved more than $11 million in grants to the governor's office to help the island prepare for the military buildup.
Bamba, during an interview on K-57 radio in late October, said OEA had completed its review and was waiting for the Guam attorney general's office to release its findings. He said he hoped it would happen within a week.
But OEA has not completed its review, according to the Defense Department.
The Pacific Daily News in November submitted a Freedom of Information request to the military, asking for a copy of the OEA procurement review.
According to the military, OEA Director Patrick O'Brien, who is the "initial denial authority" for his office, was unable to provide the requested documents.
"The OEA informed us that the record you seek is still in production and has not been completed," the military's Office of Freedom of Information stated in a Jan. 14 letter to the Pacific Daily News.
Attorney General Alicia Limtiaco last year recused herself from the review process. Her husband, Vincent Munoz, helped start subcontractor M2D2 in 2007, but Munoz sold his share in the company in April 2008 and did not work on the port outreach project, his attorney has said.
Military's use of landfill could benefit residents
Military's use of landfill could benefit residents
By Steve Limtiaco • Pacific Daily News • January 25, 2010
The military wants to be a customer of the new landfill when it is built, according to the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the military buildup, and that decision could help keep trash fees down for Guam residents, saving them about $20 a month.
The bad news is the current $10 monthly fee, which has been in place during the ongoing registration period, is scheduled to increase to $30 per month by April 2011, and will not decrease, even if the military commits to using the civilian landfill.
The good news is the military's use of the landfill is expected to shield residents from steep price increases during the next decade, so the monthly fee would remain about $30.
Solid waste receiver Gershman, Brickner & Bratton last summer calculated the monthly fee for residential trash collection, with and without the military's participation. The government's solid waste operations are in receivership because the government of Guam failed to close the Ordot dump and build a new landfill, as required in a 2003 consent decree.
Without the military, the monthly fee for residential trash collection would increase to $43 by 2015, then to $52.81 by 2017, according to the receiver's calculations. The $52.81 fee would hold steady for at least five years, through 2022.
And commercial customers would save as much as $118.60 per ton on commercial tipping fees if the military uses the landfill -- $156 instead of $274.60, according to the calculations for the year 2017.
According to the draft EIS for the buildup, the amount of trash that would be generated by the military is significant -- about 40 percent of the trash entering the new landfill would be put there by military customers. The entire island, including the military, is projected to produce 135,849 tons of waste per year, not including recyclable material.
But the projected life expectancy of the new landfill is expected to remain the same -- more than 30 years -- according to the receiver, because public works officials overestimated how much trash was being generated by Guam civilians. That's because there was no accurate way of measuring the trash going into Ordot dump when estimates were made for the new landfill. Trash entering Ordot dump now is weighed on a truck scale.
"It will certainly fill up faster with (the military) but the estimated life will still be well above 30 years," said David Manning, special principal associate for the solid waste receiver. "With the scale system in place, it is now clear that the total waste stream, even when the military is included, are at about the levels originally projected without the military."
In its latest quarterly report to the federal court, the receiver also noted that the military's use of the landfill could benefit the environment by reducing the number of landfills and by providing greater opportunities to work with the military on ways to recycle and minimize the amount of waste being generated here.
According to Manning, the military likely will collect and haul its own trash, even if it becomes a customer of the new landfill. In that respect, it would be similar to a commercial trash hauler.
The receiver has been negotiating with the military on behalf of the local government, and the military in July 2009 signed a letter of intent to use the new landfill.
"The military has consistently indicated that it will continue to handle its own waste collection," Manning said.
By Steve Limtiaco • Pacific Daily News • January 25, 2010
The military wants to be a customer of the new landfill when it is built, according to the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the military buildup, and that decision could help keep trash fees down for Guam residents, saving them about $20 a month.
The bad news is the current $10 monthly fee, which has been in place during the ongoing registration period, is scheduled to increase to $30 per month by April 2011, and will not decrease, even if the military commits to using the civilian landfill.
The good news is the military's use of the landfill is expected to shield residents from steep price increases during the next decade, so the monthly fee would remain about $30.
Solid waste receiver Gershman, Brickner & Bratton last summer calculated the monthly fee for residential trash collection, with and without the military's participation. The government's solid waste operations are in receivership because the government of Guam failed to close the Ordot dump and build a new landfill, as required in a 2003 consent decree.
Without the military, the monthly fee for residential trash collection would increase to $43 by 2015, then to $52.81 by 2017, according to the receiver's calculations. The $52.81 fee would hold steady for at least five years, through 2022.
And commercial customers would save as much as $118.60 per ton on commercial tipping fees if the military uses the landfill -- $156 instead of $274.60, according to the calculations for the year 2017.
According to the draft EIS for the buildup, the amount of trash that would be generated by the military is significant -- about 40 percent of the trash entering the new landfill would be put there by military customers. The entire island, including the military, is projected to produce 135,849 tons of waste per year, not including recyclable material.
But the projected life expectancy of the new landfill is expected to remain the same -- more than 30 years -- according to the receiver, because public works officials overestimated how much trash was being generated by Guam civilians. That's because there was no accurate way of measuring the trash going into Ordot dump when estimates were made for the new landfill. Trash entering Ordot dump now is weighed on a truck scale.
"It will certainly fill up faster with (the military) but the estimated life will still be well above 30 years," said David Manning, special principal associate for the solid waste receiver. "With the scale system in place, it is now clear that the total waste stream, even when the military is included, are at about the levels originally projected without the military."
In its latest quarterly report to the federal court, the receiver also noted that the military's use of the landfill could benefit the environment by reducing the number of landfills and by providing greater opportunities to work with the military on ways to recycle and minimize the amount of waste being generated here.
According to Manning, the military likely will collect and haul its own trash, even if it becomes a customer of the new landfill. In that respect, it would be similar to a commercial trash hauler.
The receiver has been negotiating with the military on behalf of the local government, and the military in July 2009 signed a letter of intent to use the new landfill.
"The military has consistently indicated that it will continue to handle its own waste collection," Manning said.
Legislature's public hearings on DEIS start today
Legislature's public hearings on DEIS start today
By Laura Matthews • Pacific Daily News • January 25, 2010
The first of the Legislature's weeklong public hearings on the draft Environmental Impact Statement begins today from 4 to 9 p.m.
All the hearings will be held at the Legislature building in Hagåtña.
These hearings will give residents another opportunity to learn about the military buildup and submit their comments before the Feb. 17 deadline.
All comments on the document will be taken into consideration and could affect what actions the military conducts on the island in order to prepare for the arrival of the 8,000 Marines and their dependents.
The draft EIS was released on Nov. 20 for public viewing and has vital information on how every aspect of life on Guam will change during the military buildup.
The Department of the Navy is preparing the draft to assess the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed military activities. The Navy is the lead agency for preparation of the draft EIS.
The Defense Department -- in preparing for the relocation of the Marines from Okinawa to Guam -- will need to provide them with a firing range for practice. Additionally, with an increase in aircraft activities, there will be more noise on the island.
The proposed actions are complex, multiservice projects involving components of the U.S. Marine Corps, Navy and Army, according to the Department of Defense. Each volume in the nine-volume draft EIS evaluates a discrete portion of the proposed actions.
"Don't be afraid to come because you're not familiar with the 11,000 pages. Just come and tell us what your thinking is, and we'll translate it into the proper format," Sen. Judith Guthertz advised residents last week.
Guthertz is the chairwoman of the legislative Committee on the Guam Military Buildup.
Since the start of the year, numerous public buildup hearings have been held by both the Defense Department and local bodies.
Gov. Felix Camacho held two presentations last week where his Advisory Consultant Team broke down the thousands of pages in the draft EIS into simple language for residents within the two-hour periods.
Residents were taught how to write "action" comments that will generate a response from the Defense Department.
The team also highlighted the major developments proposed by the military that will forever change the shape of Guam. The approximately 80,000 off-islanders to come to Guam by 2014 to occupy the jobs from the buildup, will affect all of Guam's sectors such as utilities, public safety and health services.
By Laura Matthews • Pacific Daily News • January 25, 2010
The first of the Legislature's weeklong public hearings on the draft Environmental Impact Statement begins today from 4 to 9 p.m.
All the hearings will be held at the Legislature building in Hagåtña.
These hearings will give residents another opportunity to learn about the military buildup and submit their comments before the Feb. 17 deadline.
All comments on the document will be taken into consideration and could affect what actions the military conducts on the island in order to prepare for the arrival of the 8,000 Marines and their dependents.
The draft EIS was released on Nov. 20 for public viewing and has vital information on how every aspect of life on Guam will change during the military buildup.
The Department of the Navy is preparing the draft to assess the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed military activities. The Navy is the lead agency for preparation of the draft EIS.
The Defense Department -- in preparing for the relocation of the Marines from Okinawa to Guam -- will need to provide them with a firing range for practice. Additionally, with an increase in aircraft activities, there will be more noise on the island.
The proposed actions are complex, multiservice projects involving components of the U.S. Marine Corps, Navy and Army, according to the Department of Defense. Each volume in the nine-volume draft EIS evaluates a discrete portion of the proposed actions.
"Don't be afraid to come because you're not familiar with the 11,000 pages. Just come and tell us what your thinking is, and we'll translate it into the proper format," Sen. Judith Guthertz advised residents last week.
Guthertz is the chairwoman of the legislative Committee on the Guam Military Buildup.
Since the start of the year, numerous public buildup hearings have been held by both the Defense Department and local bodies.
Gov. Felix Camacho held two presentations last week where his Advisory Consultant Team broke down the thousands of pages in the draft EIS into simple language for residents within the two-hour periods.
Residents were taught how to write "action" comments that will generate a response from the Defense Department.
The team also highlighted the major developments proposed by the military that will forever change the shape of Guam. The approximately 80,000 off-islanders to come to Guam by 2014 to occupy the jobs from the buildup, will affect all of Guam's sectors such as utilities, public safety and health services.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Senators rebuke Bordallo
Senators rebuke Bordallo
Monday, 25 January 2010 01:40
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
Democrats say delegate not acting on Guam’s behalf
CONGRESSWOMAN Madeleine Z. Bordallo will deliver her biannual congressional report to the people of Guam next month amid criticisms from some local Democratic senators who are not happy with her representation of Guam in the nation’s capital.
Bordallo will deliver her report during a legislative session that will be called by speaker Judi Won Pat on Feb. 18 at 6 p.m.
During last week’s session some senators expressed their dissatisfaction with Bordallo's work in Congress on behalf of the people of Guam.
Vice speaker BJ Cruz said Bordallo “is supposedly Guam's representative in Washington, but for the last several years has been acting more as Washington's representative to Guam.”
Senator Rory Respicio heatedly said that he was tired of being scolded by Guam's congresswoman, Madeleine Z. Bordallo and he was equally tired of the plight of the people of Guam being misunderstood by members in Congress.
“We have a delegate who scolds us for wanting to stand up for the people of Guam, who tells us point blank, ‘oh senators, you can't question the United States, of course they're going to take care of you.’ How many times have we gotten scolded for standing up and facing this military in these high level meetings we had in Washington D.C. when we bring these things up, what does our delegate say,’no, no, don't worry, you're getting more compact impact money this year.’ Of course we are because the impact is greater,” said an angry Respicio.
Lawmakers passed Resolution 160 which is to demand that the U.S. Congress acknowledge the sacrifices of the people of Guam and to grant Guam full voting rights in the U.S. House of Representatives for all matters relating to and affecting Guam and the military buildup on Guam. The other portion is for Congress to conduct hearings on Guam on all legislation that relate to the buildup.
“It's kind of sad that we have to ask the U.S. Congress to move forward on a Constitutional amendment to provide for our delegate to have a voting right on issues affecting Guam and issues especially pertaining to the military buildup,” said the lawmaker.
However, Cruz said, “I'm not sure whether or not I want to give her the vote to make a determination, because I don't want it said in the future that it was ‘your member of Congress who was the one that said yes, condemn;’ it was your member of Congress who said ‘yes, build it up;’ it was your member of Congress who said, ‘yes,bring...80,000 people...diminish the proportional representation of the indigenous people.’ I am not in support of the positions she's been taking about this buildup and I'm not sure I'm ready or not to give her this vote.”
Senator Ben Pangelinan reminded his colleagues of Guam leaders past who stood their ground, against opposition, who stood their ground not caring if the issue was popular or not, but doing what was right and wished that Bordallo would do the same.
“I would wish that our delegate when she gets this would say, ‘I think that's such a great idea... I'm going to sit on the steps of the U.S. Capitol and I’m not gonna go in there until you give Guam the right to vote.’ And we will elect her every year and send her back,” said Pangelinan.
Monday, 25 January 2010 01:40
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
Democrats say delegate not acting on Guam’s behalf
CONGRESSWOMAN Madeleine Z. Bordallo will deliver her biannual congressional report to the people of Guam next month amid criticisms from some local Democratic senators who are not happy with her representation of Guam in the nation’s capital.
Bordallo will deliver her report during a legislative session that will be called by speaker Judi Won Pat on Feb. 18 at 6 p.m.
During last week’s session some senators expressed their dissatisfaction with Bordallo's work in Congress on behalf of the people of Guam.
Vice speaker BJ Cruz said Bordallo “is supposedly Guam's representative in Washington, but for the last several years has been acting more as Washington's representative to Guam.”
Senator Rory Respicio heatedly said that he was tired of being scolded by Guam's congresswoman, Madeleine Z. Bordallo and he was equally tired of the plight of the people of Guam being misunderstood by members in Congress.
“We have a delegate who scolds us for wanting to stand up for the people of Guam, who tells us point blank, ‘oh senators, you can't question the United States, of course they're going to take care of you.’ How many times have we gotten scolded for standing up and facing this military in these high level meetings we had in Washington D.C. when we bring these things up, what does our delegate say,’no, no, don't worry, you're getting more compact impact money this year.’ Of course we are because the impact is greater,” said an angry Respicio.
Lawmakers passed Resolution 160 which is to demand that the U.S. Congress acknowledge the sacrifices of the people of Guam and to grant Guam full voting rights in the U.S. House of Representatives for all matters relating to and affecting Guam and the military buildup on Guam. The other portion is for Congress to conduct hearings on Guam on all legislation that relate to the buildup.
“It's kind of sad that we have to ask the U.S. Congress to move forward on a Constitutional amendment to provide for our delegate to have a voting right on issues affecting Guam and issues especially pertaining to the military buildup,” said the lawmaker.
However, Cruz said, “I'm not sure whether or not I want to give her the vote to make a determination, because I don't want it said in the future that it was ‘your member of Congress who was the one that said yes, condemn;’ it was your member of Congress who said ‘yes, build it up;’ it was your member of Congress who said, ‘yes,bring...80,000 people...diminish the proportional representation of the indigenous people.’ I am not in support of the positions she's been taking about this buildup and I'm not sure I'm ready or not to give her this vote.”
Senator Ben Pangelinan reminded his colleagues of Guam leaders past who stood their ground, against opposition, who stood their ground not caring if the issue was popular or not, but doing what was right and wished that Bordallo would do the same.
“I would wish that our delegate when she gets this would say, ‘I think that's such a great idea... I'm going to sit on the steps of the U.S. Capitol and I’m not gonna go in there until you give Guam the right to vote.’ And we will elect her every year and send her back,” said Pangelinan.
Senators to hear DEIS concerns
Senators to hear DEIS concerns
Monday, 25 January 2010 01:30
Variety News Staff
(Legislature) — The weeklong public hearing to discuss the community’s concerns with the draft environmental impact statement start tonight at the legislature.
The public hearing will continue until Friday.
Last week, a majority of lawmakers expressed support for Resolution 258 that expresses opposition to the use of condemnation of private land in association with the military buildup.
"All this insensitivity incenses me," vice speaker BJ Cruz told his colleagues. "They've got to take eminent domain off the table. I'm saying enough - you have sufficient land within your bases."
Sen. Eddie Calvo said, “"Not only am I against eminent domain, I'm against any further taking of any properties from the federal government - not one square inch.
Monday, 25 January 2010 01:30
Variety News Staff
(Legislature) — The weeklong public hearing to discuss the community’s concerns with the draft environmental impact statement start tonight at the legislature.
The public hearing will continue until Friday.
Last week, a majority of lawmakers expressed support for Resolution 258 that expresses opposition to the use of condemnation of private land in association with the military buildup.
"All this insensitivity incenses me," vice speaker BJ Cruz told his colleagues. "They've got to take eminent domain off the table. I'm saying enough - you have sufficient land within your bases."
Sen. Eddie Calvo said, “"Not only am I against eminent domain, I'm against any further taking of any properties from the federal government - not one square inch.
AAFB’s road expansion project begins
AAFB’s road expansion project begins
Monday, 25 January 2010 01:22
by Tiffany Sukola | Variety News Staff
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Marianas last week unveiled plans to improve several roads on Andersen Air Force Base, joining the growing list of agencies preparing for the upcoming military buildup.
“This project is meant to improve the safety, quality of life and operation readiness on base,” said NAVFAC assistant operations manager Commander Keith Barton during Friday’s groundbreaking ceremony.
According to Barton, the much-needed upgrades to several of Andersen’s roadways are necessary in order to support the upcoming population spike associated with the relocation of thousands of marines and their dependents to Guam.
The project involves widening Arc Light Boulevard, Andersen’s main thoroughfare, as well as several surrounding streets.
According to a NAVFAC press release, the project outlined in a 2009 congressional insert will include adding a median divider, bike lane and sidewalks to the current road. In addition, three roundabouts will be installed at various intersections on base.
The $5.6 million construction contract was awarded to Reliable Builders, Inc. last September.
According to Brigadier General Philip Rhulman, the realignment of Arc Light Blvd. is just one of many ongoing buildup related construction projects.
“This strategic buildup will last many years and we need to ensure efficient operations,” said Rhulman, noting that even as Andersen grows in size, base operational capability must also increase.
Rhulman also went on to explain that creating a new traffic flow was needed to decrease the number of traffic jams and accidents that already occur at Andersen.
Rhulman added that the number of cars traveling on base will dramatically increase with the arrival of the estimated 8,000 Marines and their families. And more cars, he said, meant more traffic.
Rhulman said that since studies show that roundabouts are safer, installing them around Andersen will make existing intersections less dangerous, especially during peak traffic hours.
Barton added that the construction should be completed by the end of this summer.
Monday, 25 January 2010 01:22
by Tiffany Sukola | Variety News Staff
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Marianas last week unveiled plans to improve several roads on Andersen Air Force Base, joining the growing list of agencies preparing for the upcoming military buildup.
“This project is meant to improve the safety, quality of life and operation readiness on base,” said NAVFAC assistant operations manager Commander Keith Barton during Friday’s groundbreaking ceremony.
According to Barton, the much-needed upgrades to several of Andersen’s roadways are necessary in order to support the upcoming population spike associated with the relocation of thousands of marines and their dependents to Guam.
The project involves widening Arc Light Boulevard, Andersen’s main thoroughfare, as well as several surrounding streets.
According to a NAVFAC press release, the project outlined in a 2009 congressional insert will include adding a median divider, bike lane and sidewalks to the current road. In addition, three roundabouts will be installed at various intersections on base.
The $5.6 million construction contract was awarded to Reliable Builders, Inc. last September.
According to Brigadier General Philip Rhulman, the realignment of Arc Light Blvd. is just one of many ongoing buildup related construction projects.
“This strategic buildup will last many years and we need to ensure efficient operations,” said Rhulman, noting that even as Andersen grows in size, base operational capability must also increase.
Rhulman also went on to explain that creating a new traffic flow was needed to decrease the number of traffic jams and accidents that already occur at Andersen.
Rhulman added that the number of cars traveling on base will dramatically increase with the arrival of the estimated 8,000 Marines and their families. And more cars, he said, meant more traffic.
Rhulman said that since studies show that roundabouts are safer, installing them around Andersen will make existing intersections less dangerous, especially during peak traffic hours.
Barton added that the construction should be completed by the end of this summer.
DEIS Perspective : What lies ahead are D.C.’s ‘pompous’ lies
DEIS Perspective : What lies ahead are D.C.’s ‘pompous’ lies
Monday, 25 January 2010 01:04
DEIS Perspective : by Tony Artero
(This is in response to Derick Hills,’ “DEIS Perspective: What lies ahead,” published in this section on Jan. 21.)
THIS draft environmental impact statement for the military buildup is with major misgivings. It is following the historic wrong “politically correct” practices and, like the mafia, it must be stop. Without changing our direction, fixing the problems, and doing everything right here on out will not be any different from the first buildup in the 1940s after World War II that left us in this dire state.
The people could not return to their once productive livelihood. The excessive land taking extinguished their chance to recover from the War.
The people were forced to start over, but under dependency upon the government for economic sustenance. The government officials’ struggle had always been in trying to create something from nothing.
Aside from the issues of war reparation and equal treatment, the economy had always been the top priority. Tourism was finally allowed after the lifting of the federal “security” restriction. The economy flourishes, but only for a few years.
I do not have any misunderstanding. No one can create something from nothing. The military economy, like tourism, come and goes without our say. Guam is now like a junky car along Marine Corps Drive. When the 80,000 people with the Marines arrive, Guam will be a bombed-out junk car with us in it.
The thinking of Guam’s strategic location is now obsolete with the militaristic technologies we have today, but Guam's "strategic location" theory is still the perfect, yet lame, excuse to continue the discrimination against Guam's indigenous people. This excuse will never put America back to work. If Guam is truly strategically located real estate for America’s defense, why abandon the Declaration of Independence? America is shooting itself in the heart.
This military buildup is the U.S. government pushing its agenda, which will not even be a window-dressing to Guam's World War II battle wounds. Guam will be overrun again.
Washington D.C. is still full of pompous lies. Okinawa is closer to the “hot spot” than Guam will ever be. Besides, Guam’s strategic location is not defending America. Just the opposite, attacks by terrorists started with the bombing in Oklahoma City on 4-19-1995, which signals the dawning of America’s downfall, but the beat goes on. The attacks on 9-11 show that America’s sword diplomacy is a failure, but the beat still goes on.
The conditions on Guam have been spiraling downward since WWII and will spin even faster with the dramatic changes this military buildup will bring to us. The United States of course thinks mainly of its own benefit. The consequences on us are of minimal concern. However, the federal deficit is sky rocketing with “security” that is more questionable and the global economy in chaos.
If there ever was a time when enlightenment was needed, it is now.
(Tony Artero, a retired submariner with the U.S. Navy, is a resident of Agana Heights.)
Monday, 25 January 2010 01:04
DEIS Perspective : by Tony Artero
(This is in response to Derick Hills,’ “DEIS Perspective: What lies ahead,” published in this section on Jan. 21.)
THIS draft environmental impact statement for the military buildup is with major misgivings. It is following the historic wrong “politically correct” practices and, like the mafia, it must be stop. Without changing our direction, fixing the problems, and doing everything right here on out will not be any different from the first buildup in the 1940s after World War II that left us in this dire state.
The people could not return to their once productive livelihood. The excessive land taking extinguished their chance to recover from the War.
The people were forced to start over, but under dependency upon the government for economic sustenance. The government officials’ struggle had always been in trying to create something from nothing.
Aside from the issues of war reparation and equal treatment, the economy had always been the top priority. Tourism was finally allowed after the lifting of the federal “security” restriction. The economy flourishes, but only for a few years.
I do not have any misunderstanding. No one can create something from nothing. The military economy, like tourism, come and goes without our say. Guam is now like a junky car along Marine Corps Drive. When the 80,000 people with the Marines arrive, Guam will be a bombed-out junk car with us in it.
The thinking of Guam’s strategic location is now obsolete with the militaristic technologies we have today, but Guam's "strategic location" theory is still the perfect, yet lame, excuse to continue the discrimination against Guam's indigenous people. This excuse will never put America back to work. If Guam is truly strategically located real estate for America’s defense, why abandon the Declaration of Independence? America is shooting itself in the heart.
This military buildup is the U.S. government pushing its agenda, which will not even be a window-dressing to Guam's World War II battle wounds. Guam will be overrun again.
Washington D.C. is still full of pompous lies. Okinawa is closer to the “hot spot” than Guam will ever be. Besides, Guam’s strategic location is not defending America. Just the opposite, attacks by terrorists started with the bombing in Oklahoma City on 4-19-1995, which signals the dawning of America’s downfall, but the beat goes on. The attacks on 9-11 show that America’s sword diplomacy is a failure, but the beat still goes on.
The conditions on Guam have been spiraling downward since WWII and will spin even faster with the dramatic changes this military buildup will bring to us. The United States of course thinks mainly of its own benefit. The consequences on us are of minimal concern. However, the federal deficit is sky rocketing with “security” that is more questionable and the global economy in chaos.
If there ever was a time when enlightenment was needed, it is now.
(Tony Artero, a retired submariner with the U.S. Navy, is a resident of Agana Heights.)
Senators plan DEIS meetings
Senators plan DEIS meetings
Posted: Jan 24, 2010 2:33 PM
by Michele Catahay
Guam - The Guam Legislature will be hosting several public hearings this week on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Marines relocation from Okinawa to Guam. The first will be held tomorrow and Tuesday from 4-9pm. Another will be held on Wednesday from 6-9 with the CCU, GWA and GPA.
Then on Thursday, another hearing will also be held from 6 to 9 with the Department of Public Works. The last will be held on Friday from 4 to 9. All hearings will take place at the Legislature in Hagatna.
Posted: Jan 24, 2010 2:33 PM
by Michele Catahay
Guam - The Guam Legislature will be hosting several public hearings this week on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Marines relocation from Okinawa to Guam. The first will be held tomorrow and Tuesday from 4-9pm. Another will be held on Wednesday from 6-9 with the CCU, GWA and GPA.
Then on Thursday, another hearing will also be held from 6 to 9 with the Department of Public Works. The last will be held on Friday from 4 to 9. All hearings will take place at the Legislature in Hagatna.
Future of Okinawa base strains U.S.-Japanese alliance
Future of Okinawa base strains U.S.-Japanese alliance
By Blaine Harden
washington post foreign service
Sunday, January 24, 2010; A13
GINOWAN, JAPAN -- The people of Okinawa and the U.S. Marine Corps agree on at least one thing: The Futenma Marine air station is a noisy dinosaur that needs to move elsewhere -- and soon.
Smack in the middle of this densely packed city of 92,000 and taking up about a quarter of its land, the air base torments its neighbors with the howl of combat helicopters and the shudder of C-130 transport planes.
"The noise is unbearable," said Harumi Chinen, principal of Futenma No. 2 Elementary School, where about 780 children study in buildings next to the airfield. "A school should be very comforting and safe. That is not the case here."
Where can the Marines and their earsplitting machines go? That question has triggered the most serious quarrel in the history of the traditionally harmonious U.S.-Japanese alliance, which last week marked its 50th anniversary.
The relocation question has exasperated the Obama administration and strained its dealings with a country that the United States is treaty-bound to protect in case of attack. Hanging in the balance is the future of a $26 billion deal between Japan and the United States to transfer 8,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam and turn over several valuable tracts of urban land to the people of the island.
Worry, too, has spread across East Asia, as officials from South Korea to Australia have expressed concern about the future of the U.S. security role in the region.
The 14,200 Marines who train with aircraft from Futenma are the only mobile U.S. ground forces based in East Asia, said Lt. Gen. Keith J. Stalder, commander of Marine forces in the Pacific. "They bring a lot of stability and security that allows the Asia Pacific region to be a relatively peaceful place," he said.
Yet even from a Marine point of view, staying at Futenma is not desirable. Decades of citizen complaints -- and the 2004 crash of a Marine helicopter into a nearby college campus, which miraculously killed no one -- have triggered flight restrictions that degrade the tactical utility of the Futenma base, especially in training Marines for night combat.
"These restrictions reduce the number of aircraft we can put up through a 24-hour day," said Lt. Gen. Terry G. Robling, Marine commander on this tropical island, which has a strategic perch between Taiwan and the Korean Peninsula. "It is not a showstopper, but it is a factor."
Until last year, the Futenma problem had a treaty-guaranteed solution that pleased the Marines, soothed the allies and suited Tokyo: The air station would move to a new seaside home at Camp Schwab, in the thinly populated north of the island.
Democracy scuttled the deal. In August, Japanese voters tossed out the Liberal Democratic Party, which had ruled the country for nearly 50 years and had agreed in 2006 on the relocation of the Marine base.
The winner of the election had other ideas about the future of the air station and Japan's relationship with the United States. The Democratic Party of Japan and its leader, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, campaigned on the claim that Japan had for too long been too passive in its U.S. dealings. To make the point, Hatoyama froze the base relocation plan, while suggesting that the Marines move their airfield off Okinawa and perhaps out of Japan altogether.
This delighted and energized many of Okinawa's 1.4 million people, who have long complained that they bear a disproportionate burden of their country's security alliance. Most of the 36,000 U.S. military personnel in Japan are based on Okinawa, and local unease over their presence has grown rapidly since 1996, when two Marines and a sailor raped a 12-year-old girl.
"With the new leadership in Tokyo, we have moved away from a relationship where the United States gives an order and Japan says, 'Yes,' " said Yoichi Ida, the mayor of Ginowan and an outspoken advocate of moving the air station out of this city and off the island. "If the Americans try to force their will upon us, obviously Japan-U.S. ties will not go very smoothly."
On Sunday, in a mayoral election in Nago, a northern city of 65,000 people that includes Camp Schwab, an anti-base challenger is running against an incumbent who supports the relocation plan. The outcome of the election is being closely watched in Tokyo and might influence a final decision on the future of the base, which Hatoyama promised last week would be made by May.
The Obama administration's position on the base issue has moderated substantially in the past three months. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates warned in November of serious consequences if Japan did not honor its 2006 promise. But this month, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton voiced patient understanding, saying, "We are respectful of the process that the Japanese government is going through."
Still, the White House is continuing to press for the existing relocation plan. "An alliance requires sacrifices on both sides, and it is going to make some people unhappy," a senior administration official said.
When the United States completed its 8,000-foot runway at Futenma air station, there were no problems with complaining neighbors. It was 1947, and the base was surrounded by farmland.
But amid the rubble of Okinawa, where a ferocious World War II battle between U.S. and Japanese forces had razed much of island, the base created jobs, attracted businesses and sowed seeds for what would become a thriving city.
Futenma No. 2 Elementary School moved next to the airfield to be near the working families that encircled the base, said Chinen, the principal.
Marine officials say encroachment on the airfield is simply not their fault. "Why aren't you asking why the Japanese didn't have better zoning laws?" said Robling, the Marine commander. "They built a school right under the runway. What were they thinking?"
Japanese aviation law requires "clear zones" around civilian airports, but the rules do not apply to U.S. military bases. Neither Japanese nor U.S. authorities stopped local people from building beside the base.
Whatever the reason for encroachment, Robling and other U.S. officials acknowledge that it has long since made Futenma a poor site for a military airfield.
But if helicopters end up having no place else to go on Okinawa, Robling said, the Marine mission in Japan and East Asia would be dangerously compromised.
If helicopters were based on Guam or main islands of Japan, he said, "it would be like infielders training on the West Coast and outfielders training on the East Coast. On game day, everyone shows up and is somehow expected to play together."
Marine training issues, though, do not get much sympathy at Futenma No. 2 Elementary, where teachers are instructed to remain silent and not shout over the roar of passing aircraft.
"My personal wish is for the air base to move outside of Okinawa," Chinen said. "But who would raise his hand to take it? No one."
Special correspondent Akiko Yamamoto contributed to this report.
By Blaine Harden
washington post foreign service
Sunday, January 24, 2010; A13
GINOWAN, JAPAN -- The people of Okinawa and the U.S. Marine Corps agree on at least one thing: The Futenma Marine air station is a noisy dinosaur that needs to move elsewhere -- and soon.
Smack in the middle of this densely packed city of 92,000 and taking up about a quarter of its land, the air base torments its neighbors with the howl of combat helicopters and the shudder of C-130 transport planes.
"The noise is unbearable," said Harumi Chinen, principal of Futenma No. 2 Elementary School, where about 780 children study in buildings next to the airfield. "A school should be very comforting and safe. That is not the case here."
Where can the Marines and their earsplitting machines go? That question has triggered the most serious quarrel in the history of the traditionally harmonious U.S.-Japanese alliance, which last week marked its 50th anniversary.
The relocation question has exasperated the Obama administration and strained its dealings with a country that the United States is treaty-bound to protect in case of attack. Hanging in the balance is the future of a $26 billion deal between Japan and the United States to transfer 8,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam and turn over several valuable tracts of urban land to the people of the island.
Worry, too, has spread across East Asia, as officials from South Korea to Australia have expressed concern about the future of the U.S. security role in the region.
The 14,200 Marines who train with aircraft from Futenma are the only mobile U.S. ground forces based in East Asia, said Lt. Gen. Keith J. Stalder, commander of Marine forces in the Pacific. "They bring a lot of stability and security that allows the Asia Pacific region to be a relatively peaceful place," he said.
Yet even from a Marine point of view, staying at Futenma is not desirable. Decades of citizen complaints -- and the 2004 crash of a Marine helicopter into a nearby college campus, which miraculously killed no one -- have triggered flight restrictions that degrade the tactical utility of the Futenma base, especially in training Marines for night combat.
"These restrictions reduce the number of aircraft we can put up through a 24-hour day," said Lt. Gen. Terry G. Robling, Marine commander on this tropical island, which has a strategic perch between Taiwan and the Korean Peninsula. "It is not a showstopper, but it is a factor."
Until last year, the Futenma problem had a treaty-guaranteed solution that pleased the Marines, soothed the allies and suited Tokyo: The air station would move to a new seaside home at Camp Schwab, in the thinly populated north of the island.
Democracy scuttled the deal. In August, Japanese voters tossed out the Liberal Democratic Party, which had ruled the country for nearly 50 years and had agreed in 2006 on the relocation of the Marine base.
The winner of the election had other ideas about the future of the air station and Japan's relationship with the United States. The Democratic Party of Japan and its leader, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, campaigned on the claim that Japan had for too long been too passive in its U.S. dealings. To make the point, Hatoyama froze the base relocation plan, while suggesting that the Marines move their airfield off Okinawa and perhaps out of Japan altogether.
This delighted and energized many of Okinawa's 1.4 million people, who have long complained that they bear a disproportionate burden of their country's security alliance. Most of the 36,000 U.S. military personnel in Japan are based on Okinawa, and local unease over their presence has grown rapidly since 1996, when two Marines and a sailor raped a 12-year-old girl.
"With the new leadership in Tokyo, we have moved away from a relationship where the United States gives an order and Japan says, 'Yes,' " said Yoichi Ida, the mayor of Ginowan and an outspoken advocate of moving the air station out of this city and off the island. "If the Americans try to force their will upon us, obviously Japan-U.S. ties will not go very smoothly."
On Sunday, in a mayoral election in Nago, a northern city of 65,000 people that includes Camp Schwab, an anti-base challenger is running against an incumbent who supports the relocation plan. The outcome of the election is being closely watched in Tokyo and might influence a final decision on the future of the base, which Hatoyama promised last week would be made by May.
The Obama administration's position on the base issue has moderated substantially in the past three months. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates warned in November of serious consequences if Japan did not honor its 2006 promise. But this month, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton voiced patient understanding, saying, "We are respectful of the process that the Japanese government is going through."
Still, the White House is continuing to press for the existing relocation plan. "An alliance requires sacrifices on both sides, and it is going to make some people unhappy," a senior administration official said.
When the United States completed its 8,000-foot runway at Futenma air station, there were no problems with complaining neighbors. It was 1947, and the base was surrounded by farmland.
But amid the rubble of Okinawa, where a ferocious World War II battle between U.S. and Japanese forces had razed much of island, the base created jobs, attracted businesses and sowed seeds for what would become a thriving city.
Futenma No. 2 Elementary School moved next to the airfield to be near the working families that encircled the base, said Chinen, the principal.
Marine officials say encroachment on the airfield is simply not their fault. "Why aren't you asking why the Japanese didn't have better zoning laws?" said Robling, the Marine commander. "They built a school right under the runway. What were they thinking?"
Japanese aviation law requires "clear zones" around civilian airports, but the rules do not apply to U.S. military bases. Neither Japanese nor U.S. authorities stopped local people from building beside the base.
Whatever the reason for encroachment, Robling and other U.S. officials acknowledge that it has long since made Futenma a poor site for a military airfield.
But if helicopters end up having no place else to go on Okinawa, Robling said, the Marine mission in Japan and East Asia would be dangerously compromised.
If helicopters were based on Guam or main islands of Japan, he said, "it would be like infielders training on the West Coast and outfielders training on the East Coast. On game day, everyone shows up and is somehow expected to play together."
Marine training issues, though, do not get much sympathy at Futenma No. 2 Elementary, where teachers are instructed to remain silent and not shout over the roar of passing aircraft.
"My personal wish is for the air base to move outside of Okinawa," Chinen said. "But who would raise his hand to take it? No one."
Special correspondent Akiko Yamamoto contributed to this report.
Voting begins in Nago poll that may affect Hatoyama decision on Futemma
Voting begins in Nago poll that may affect Hatoyama decision on Futemma
Jan 23 07:10 PM US/Eastern
(AP) - NAGO, Japan, Jan. 24 (Kyodo) — Voting began Sunday morning in an election to pick the leader of the city of Nago, Okinawa Prefecture, which may determine Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama's decision on the future of the U.S. Marine Corps' Futemma Air Station in Ginowan, another city in the southernmost Japanese prefecture.
The mayoral election is being closely watched as Hatoyama has said that he wants to see the result before deciding whether to relocate the Futemma facility, which currently sits in a residential area in Ginowan, to Nago in line with a 2006 Japan-U.S. deal or to transfer it outside the prefecture as he has advocated.
Incumbent Nago Mayor Yoshikazu Shimabukuro, 63, has shown his willingness to accept the existing plan if Tokyo decides to do so, while his sole rival Susumu Inamine, 64, is resolutely opposed to it.
Under the bilateral deal, the central Okinawa city of Nago with a population of about 60,000 will have to have a new heliport base built along the coast of the U.S. Marine Corps' Camp Schwab near the city's Henoko area to accommodate the Futemma facility.
"We have suffered for 13 years...with neighbors long being at loggerheads with each other," Inamine told voters Saturday. "But let's put an end to it in this (election). I will not have another base constructed in Henoko waters."
Inamine was referring to a local referendum in 1997 in which a majority voted against the relocation and the fact that the U.S. base issue has divided the city over whether it should accept the base in exchange for a considerable amount of government subsidies. The city has been plagued by fiscal problems.
During campaigning Saturday, meanwhile, Shimabukuro made virtually no mention of the relocation issue, arguing it is a matter that neither a mayor nor local people in the city should decide on.
Instead, Shimabukuro has highlighted what he has achieved during his past four-year term including the creation of 1,000 jobs by inviting companies from outside the city, as well as maintaining economic stability by taking advantage of base-related state subsidies.
Inamine is running as an independent but has support from Hatoyama's Democratic Party of Japan and its coalition partners -- the Social Democratic Party and the People's New Party -- and the Japanese Communist Party, while Shimabukuro, running also as an independent, has the backing of two opposition parties -- the Liberal Democratic Party and the New Komeito party.
Inamine, who is former chairman of the city's education board, is also supported by civic groups opposing the construction of a new U.S. base, while Shimabukuro is largely backed by construction firms that have benefited from the state subsidies and related public works projects.
Hatoyama reiterated last week that his government would conclude negotiations with the United States by the end of May on where to relocate the Futemma facility.
Since taking office last September, the 62-year-old Japanese leader has been evasive on the issue and this has been widely seen as straining Japan-U.S. relations.
Jan 23 07:10 PM US/Eastern
(AP) - NAGO, Japan, Jan. 24 (Kyodo) — Voting began Sunday morning in an election to pick the leader of the city of Nago, Okinawa Prefecture, which may determine Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama's decision on the future of the U.S. Marine Corps' Futemma Air Station in Ginowan, another city in the southernmost Japanese prefecture.
The mayoral election is being closely watched as Hatoyama has said that he wants to see the result before deciding whether to relocate the Futemma facility, which currently sits in a residential area in Ginowan, to Nago in line with a 2006 Japan-U.S. deal or to transfer it outside the prefecture as he has advocated.
Incumbent Nago Mayor Yoshikazu Shimabukuro, 63, has shown his willingness to accept the existing plan if Tokyo decides to do so, while his sole rival Susumu Inamine, 64, is resolutely opposed to it.
Under the bilateral deal, the central Okinawa city of Nago with a population of about 60,000 will have to have a new heliport base built along the coast of the U.S. Marine Corps' Camp Schwab near the city's Henoko area to accommodate the Futemma facility.
"We have suffered for 13 years...with neighbors long being at loggerheads with each other," Inamine told voters Saturday. "But let's put an end to it in this (election). I will not have another base constructed in Henoko waters."
Inamine was referring to a local referendum in 1997 in which a majority voted against the relocation and the fact that the U.S. base issue has divided the city over whether it should accept the base in exchange for a considerable amount of government subsidies. The city has been plagued by fiscal problems.
During campaigning Saturday, meanwhile, Shimabukuro made virtually no mention of the relocation issue, arguing it is a matter that neither a mayor nor local people in the city should decide on.
Instead, Shimabukuro has highlighted what he has achieved during his past four-year term including the creation of 1,000 jobs by inviting companies from outside the city, as well as maintaining economic stability by taking advantage of base-related state subsidies.
Inamine is running as an independent but has support from Hatoyama's Democratic Party of Japan and its coalition partners -- the Social Democratic Party and the People's New Party -- and the Japanese Communist Party, while Shimabukuro, running also as an independent, has the backing of two opposition parties -- the Liberal Democratic Party and the New Komeito party.
Inamine, who is former chairman of the city's education board, is also supported by civic groups opposing the construction of a new U.S. base, while Shimabukuro is largely backed by construction firms that have benefited from the state subsidies and related public works projects.
Hatoyama reiterated last week that his government would conclude negotiations with the United States by the end of May on where to relocate the Futemma facility.
Since taking office last September, the 62-year-old Japanese leader has been evasive on the issue and this has been widely seen as straining Japan-U.S. relations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)