Showing posts with label Economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Economy. Show all posts

Friday, October 29, 2010

Great Debate saw final election push

by Sabrina Salas Matanane from KUAM.com

Guam - The final showdown between the two gubernatorial teams was much more structured and organized than their verbal scrap held the night before at the Hyatt and hosted by the Guam Medical Association.

University of Guam Field House was packed with supporters from both camps. They were asked a total of 18 questions. In his opening statements former Governor Carl T.C. Gutierrez talked about his experience and how the stakes are high with the military buildup. He added that the Guam needed a seasoned leader, someone with experience in crisis management and a leader than can pull the community together. His opponent Senator Eddie Baza Calvo began by thanking his supporters. The republican candidate for governor then began to attack his opponent's record reminding them about the Gutierrez Administration when there was "hanom taki", a 38% graduation rate for high school students and 10,000 people who were unemployed. Calvo's running-mate Senator Ray Tenorio then began to speak saying this election is about "character not charm".

When asked "If you are elected, how will your administration address critical issues and concerns in public K-12 education?" Gutierrez responded that he will work the Bureau of Budget Management and Research to ensure the Department of Education receives its timely allotments. Senator Calvo however reminded the public that Gutierrez transferred $2 million out of education when he came into office.

When asked "How will our administration work to preserve Guam's culture?' Calvo responded saying he would spend more money on the Department of Education to promote the Chamorro culture in school. He added that he would support the construction of a Chamorro museum, Gef Pago and the Hurao Academy. Calvo added that he would also work with village mayors to maintain their unique identity and would work to revitalize Hagatna. Democrat Gutierrez said "Language is the umbilical chord of our culture".

When asked "How will your administration work with these agencies or other stakeholders to improve law enforcement on Guam?" Gutierrez started by referring to public law that mandates law enforcement officers receive their 10% increments over the next four years. Gutierrez said he will work to make sure they get their necessary raises. The democrat gubernatorial candidate also said that if elected he would pull together Guam's law enforcement and the military's to be part of "community policing". Gutierrez also talked about how under his administration streetlights were put up for safety reasons but it was this administration that took them down. Republican Calvo responded by calling Gutierrez out, saying that when he was Governor he increased the number of police officers to watch him, that under his administration there was a record number of rapes and murders. Calvo said if elected "there will be more police officers". He added that he would work to improve technology, communication and interconnectivity with law enforcement. He added that he supports more neighborhood patrol programs and would open more police kobans.

During the set of questions for candidates for Lt. Governor, the first question posed was "if elected, how will your leadership team improve and support adult and higher education on Guam?" Senator Frank Aguon Jr, approached the podium with a copy of their policy platform, ASAP Guam". Holding it in the air Aguon said they will work collectively and collaboratively with the University of Guam and the Guam Community College to make sure they identify the opportunities and challenges to get good job for families. In Senator Ray Tenorio's response he said "he showed you a book, our platform is n our heart". Calvo added that under a Calvo Tenorio administration they will create new scholarships among other things. He added that Calvo helped put together the apprenticeship program and that together if elected they will help everyone, not a few.

When asked "How will your administration manage our precious lands and work with landowners?" Tenorio said their plan first would say Pagat is not sale. He added that they will protect Pagat and that the Department of Defense should stay within its existing blueprint. Senator Aguon talked about the Chamorro Land Trust Commission and that under a Gutierrez Aguon administration it would be a priority to ensure those properties are immediately surveyed.

When asked "How will your administration work to reduce crime?" Aguon responded by saying they would work with village mayors and law enforcement agencies to recognize what law enforcement heads have to do for the buildup. He added they would partner with military security forces to be part of the community. Senator Tenorio said you will have a Lt. Governor who was a cop. He added that former Governor Carl Gutierrez had more police officers protecting him than on the streets. He also responded to Gutierrez' earlier statements about streetlights, saying their were "chandeliers in Agana Heights". Tenorio ended saying more cops means more safety.

When asked "How will your administration improve Guam's economy and provide for long term growth?" Calvo started by referring to Gutierrez record as Governor saying unemployment was at 15% and how 10,000 people were unemployed. Calvo added that under his administration they will take advantage of the buildup and implement the classroom to careers initiative. He said he will go to the Department of Education, University of Guam and the Guam Community College and ask them to build a curriculum so that our young people can take advantage of the new economy. Gutierrez responded to the question saying we need to get more Visa Waiver programs for Guam and work with the airlines. He says if you bring in more tourists it's guaranteed the economy will get better.

When asked "what will your administration do to improve Guam-Federal relations?' Gutierrez started by saying when he was Governor he doesn't believe any one had a better relationship, referring to how he was able to bring former President Bill Clinton to Guam. He said that we have been ignored in Washington D.C. and do not have a face there. He says its not Bordallo's job, he said it's the Governor of Guam's job to network," This face will be the face of Guam in the federal government," Gutierrez said. In response Senator Calvo said "his face is so great the federal government took their kids out of public school." Calvo added that he's friends with Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo and would work with her.

When asked "how will your administration work to improve Guam's utilities?" Calvo was first to respond and again referred to when Gutierrez was Governor when GWA had "hanom taki". Calvo said children were drinking water that could kill them. The republican candidate then said under the Consolidated Commission on Utilities there has been vast improvements and that he would work with them and the federal government. He made reference to his bi-partisan trip to the nation's capitol and said that with the help of Congresswoman Bordallo they were able to secure millions in federal money for infrastructure improvements outside the fence. Gutierrez said that he would work with the legislature to allow the Governor to be able to appoint some of the members to the CCU. He also said he recalled when he was Governor that the Guam Environmental Protection Agency shutdown Tropicool which was run by Pepsi. He said while he was trying to fix hanom taki you were selling it to the people.

It was once again turn for the candidates to Lieutenant Governor to be asked questions. When asked "How will your administration work to improve relations with the judiciary?" Senator Aguon said his running mate knows almost everyone in the court by now despite detractors that have tried to take him down he stands here innocent. Aguon then said they need to provide more resources and expand the northern satellite court among other things. Tenorio said that the reason people in the court may know him is because of the number of times he's been indicted and the number of times his agency heads have been indicted. Tenorio added that they need to get the judiciary their resources and bring people and government officials to justice.

When asked "How will your administration work with the Guam legislature?" Calvo was first to answer and asked the crowd at the UOG Field House "How many democrats are here for Calvo Tenorio?", He followed up "I love both sides… that's so important to work with consensus." The republican candidate for governor said he will work with Delegate Bordallo and all sectors of the community he added that during his first week he will meet with the Legislature both minority and majority. He said "Now is the time to come together." Former Governor Carl Gutierrez took the podium and said the only problem when governor was working with the Legislature but come January 1st he is ready and is already working with the Legislature. He cited how he and Senator Ben Pangelinan will work together, "there is no time for petty politics". He added that he has a great working relationship with all the democrats.

The debate ended with both teams coming together shaking hands. Residents are encouraged to read teams respective platforms. To view Gutierrez Aguon's ASAP Guam policy platform log on to voteforguam.com. To read the Calvo Tenorio team's Blueprint 2020 log to calvotenorio.com.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Big losses projected if H-2s work on buildup projects

Big losses projected if H-2s work on buildup projects

Posted: Feb 11, 2010 5:08 PM
Updated: Feb 11, 2010 5:08 PM

by Mindy Aguon

Guam - Vice-Speaker B.J. Cruz says Guam's economy stands to lose hundreds of millions of dollars if H-2 workers are allowed to be utilized for military buildup-related construction projects. Cruz has asked Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo to reconsider her position on allowing H-2 workers for buildup construction activities.

He told KUAM News, "I'm just asking that she reconsider the Abercrombie amendment, which is suggesting a 30% maximum of H-2 laborers, and if we reduce it to that amount then we'll have more money floating in the economy." He added, "If you're going to force it down our throat, then I want every penny that's absolutely possible to accrue to the local people."

Estimates in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement project that H-2 workers will spend about 20% of their money in the local economy, compared to 45% to be spent by workers hired locally. Cruz says if the H-2 workers spent at the same level as locally-hired workers, Guam's economy would benefit by approximately $368.5 million.

Friday, February 12, 2010

UOG Economics Professor Says Benefits Of Buildup Overstated in DEIS

UOG Economics Professor Says Benefits Of Buildup Overstated in DEIS

Monday, 08 February 2010

Guam - A University of Guam professor of economics is saying that the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Guam military buildup is inaccurately estimating the economic boost that the buildup will bring Guam. According to Dr. Claret Ruane the DEIS estimates are overstating the buildup's economic impacts.

University of Guam professor of economics Dr. Claret Ruane says that the DEIS is borrowing a formula from Hawaii to calculate the economic benefits of the Guam Military Buildup.

According to Dr. Ruane it all boils down to what's called the multiplier effect. Basically it's a formula used by economists to determine how much money will circulate through an economy. Dr. Ruane says the DEIS does this by multiplying every dollar brought into Guam from the buildup and multiplying it by 1.89. 1.89 is the same figure that Hawaii uses to determine the multiplier effect.

Dr. Ruane feels that the Guam multiplier is much less. She thinks Guam should be using a multiplier of 1.5 but just for arguments sake she based her first analysis on a multiplier of 1.82. The DEIS estimates the total number of dollars circulating in the economy because of the buildup as over a billion dollars. Dr. Ruane used a multiplier of 1.82 and came up with $567 million. Using a 1.5 multiplier gave her a figure of $467 million. Dr. Ruane's biggest problem is that there simply isn't any real data to determine what formula Guam should be using. Thus she'd rather err on the side of caution. She says "I'd like to be more positive about it but the numbers are just not giving me a straight answer."

It's important to know how much money will be infused into Guam's economy so that the government can calculate how much revenues they can count on. Dr. Ruane says that if the total economic benefit ends up being half of what is estimated then revenues collected by GovGuam will also be half of what is estimated.

Dr. Ruane is not against the buildup but she says this should be an opportunity to look to the future of the island and look at what other options Guam has to further develop it's economy. She says it is a good call for the community and "...military buildup or not we should find ways to move this island forward."

Written by : Clynt Ridgell

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Pangelinan says DEIS math is faulty

Pangelinan says DEIS math is faulty

Wednesday, 03 February 2010 01:38
by Zita Y. Taitano | Variety News Staff

SENATOR Ben Pangelinan claimed yesterday a section of the draft environmental impact statement on local government revenues is flawed.

The chairman of the Committee on Appropriations, Taxation, Banking, Insurance, Retirement and Land and the Office of Finance and Budget said the government of Guam collects 10 percent of every dollar that is pumped into the coffers.

In his findings, Pangelinan noted that the DEIS analysis used calculations based on collections between 42 and 49 percent of the estimated gross island product.

“There is something in their financial model that is causing a wide variance in the ratio, but because the methodology and actual model were not disclosed in the DEIS, there is no way for us to even scrutinize the estimates,” Pangelinan said.

And while he agrees that increasing the island’s economy is an important asset, however, he believes that GovGuam should balance that growth with “the protection of the environment, culture, and quality of life of island residents.”

He has already sent out letters to various organizations in the private sector on the matter as well as the University of Guam, all govGuam agencies, the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Defense requesting for a review of the estimates to confirm his committee’s findings.

“The core questions that must be answered with some degree of comfort before we get to the table are the cost and future revenue collections that will result from this buildup,” he concluded.

GEDA: Buildup Impacts Will Exceed Benefits

GEDA: Buildup Impacts Will Exceed Benefits

Guam - Last week the Guam Economic Development Authority released some of it's findings on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement of the military buildup.



The bottom line according to GEDA is that the economic impacts will exceed the economic benefits unless mitigation measures are identified and included in the Final EIS.

During Governor Bordallo's administration Joseph Bradley was the Chief Economist for GovGuam. Recently he's given presentations to the civilian military task force on the economic portion of the Draft Environmental impact statement. He's come to some of the same conclusions that the Guam Economic Development Agency has reached. For example concerns that the economic impacts will outweigh the economic benefits. Many in the local business community have touted the boost that servicemen and women will have on the economy. The DEIS however states that only 12% of military payroll will be spent in the local economy. Bradley says "I don't think that Tumon is exactly what a sailor on shore leave is looking for anyway." Instead Bradley believes many of the servicemen and women will be craving the forms of food and entertainment that they are used to in the states. While Tumon offers some of this Tumon was developed with the Japanese tourist in mind.

Bradley says one way to mitigate this is for local businessemen to begin creating attractions and entertainment that servicemen will want to go to. Another concern of GEDA's is that according to the DEIS after the population decreases the island of Guam will have an excess or oversupply of housing. Bradley says this could mean abandoned houses and even commercial buildings that is unless we find a way to mitigate these potential negative impacts. Bradley has some of his own ideas for example he says GovGuam could work with the federal governement to develop programs to convert excess housing into affordable or low cost governement housing.

Finally there is the recession like period that will occur according to the DEIS after the buildup ends and the population diminishes. The boom itself will be three times larger than the tourism boom of the 80's. While bradley says that the recession will still be better than Guam's current economy it's how fast and how steep the economy recedes which is what will really cause problems.

Written by :
Clynt Ridgell

Vice Speaker Cruz Pushes for Easing of Visa Restrictions On Chinese and Russian Tourists

Vice Speaker Cruz Pushes for Easing of Visa Restrictions On Chinese and Russian Tourists

Guam - In a move to secure a diversified economy for Guam after the military buildup, Vice Speaker Benjamin Cruz

has sent a letter to Congresswoman Madeleine Z. Bordallo, requesting that she urge the Department of Defense to support a favorable ruling by the Department of Homeland Security that would ease restrictions on visas for visitors from China and Russia.

According to Vice Speaker Cruz, "The 'steady state' of Guam's economy from 2017 on, as stated in the DEIS, will be a period of increased inflation, higher wage rates, and visitor industry market loss due to buildup activities. This impact must be adequately addressed and mitigated. This can be accomplished, in part, through the diversification of our visitor industry source markets."

After the military buildup peaks in 2014, Guam will experience marked instability from having built itself up to accommodate only a temporary upsurge. Once the construction projects are complete and the transient workforce moves on, Guam will be left to contend with the fallout of a bubble burst. Securing a diverse visitor profile could yield a projected $132.3 million for the local economy from China alone just when it is most needed.

Written by :
News Release

Pangelinan Finds Flaws In DEIS Estimate of GovGuam Revenues

Pangelinan Finds Flaws In DEIS Estimate of GovGuam Revenues

Guam - The Legislature's Appropriations Committee Chairman, Senator Ben Pangelinan, says he has already found flaws in the DEIS projections of Local Government Revenues [Section 4.3.3].

In a release, Senator Pangelinan explained, “We used a simple financial ratio of General Tax Revenue to Gross Island Product that has served the government economists and bureaucrats well over the years when assessing new investment into our economy. The rule of thumb is that the government of Guam collects 10% of every new dollar invested into our economy after it multiplies through.”

General Tax Revenue in the more conservative constrained DEIS analysis show collections that are between 42 to 49% of estimated additional Gross Island Product related to the buildup. “There is something in their financial model that is causing a wide variance in the ratio but because the methodology and actual model were not disclosed in the DEIS there is no way for us to even scrutinize the estimates,” according to Pangelinan.

Local business organizations continue to lobby support for the buildup as positive because of the economic growth that will occur as a result of the Marine relocation from Okinawa. Senator pangelinan agrees that growing the economy is important but that the government of Guam must balance economic growth and protection of the environment, culture and quality of life of island residents.

Senator Pangelinan concluded “Last week I sent letters to several experts in the private sector, the University of Guam, GOVGUAM, the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Defense asking them to provide analysis of the revenue estimates to confirm our findings. The core questions that must be answered with some degree of comfort before we get to the table are the cost and future revenue collections that will result from this buildup.”

For further information, please contact the Offices of Senator ben pangelinan at 473-4236 or email at senbenp@guam.net

Written by :
News Release

Wednesday, February 03, 2010

Residents hope for Obama's reassurance

Residents hope for Obama's reassurance

By Brett Kelman • Pacific Daily News • February 2, 2010

The most important part of President Obama's trip to Guam will be what he says -- and what he hears -- about the coming military buildup, said the leader of the Guam Democratic party yesterday.

Chairwoman Pilar Lujan said the buildup is the biggest issue in Guam's future and Obama's opinion could have the biggest sway on the buildup.

If he speaks to Guam, the buildup will have to come up and residents will hang on his words, she said. Hopefully, Obama will hang on theirs, too.

"I think this particular issue has really brought out the people of Guam much more than any issue we have ever had before," she said. "It has been so divided among the people and I think that will really bring them out again to discuss it with the president."

She added later: "He listens. We hope to see that."

Obama will travel to Guam in March as part of a trip to Asia, according to a press release from Delegate Madeleine Bordallo's office. No additional details were available yesterday, said local spokesman Matt Herrmann.

It is unknown how long the president's visit will be or if he will speak to the public while he is here.

Lujan said, although his visit may be brief, she expects it to be very open.
The local Democratic Party will pursue details about the trip immediately so they can plan meetings with local leaders. She expects Obama will give a public speech also, like President Clinton did in 1998.

If Obama does give a speech, John Chargualaf, 26, hopes he will be reassured. If the president tells him the buildup will be good for Guam, Chargualaf will rest easier.
But today, Chargualaf is on the fence.

He knows the economy needs help, but he worries the population surge from the buildup could bring conflict and crime.

Many others are also unsure about the massive change, he said. Obama might be able to change that, he said.

"I want him to reassure us that it is going to benefit the island ... I want to hear what is his opinion on how military buildup will help the economy here in Guam. You know a lot of us, especially the locals, they are not all for it," Chargualaf said.

Natassia Nave, of Dededo, thought Obama could comfort those who were looking forward to the military buildup and those who oppose it.

Much of Guam is looking forward to the jobs, income and economic boost that the buildup is expected to bring, she said. Others worry their island will change and leaders don't care, she said.

Nave hoped Obama would repair relations with the new leadership in Japan while traveling in Asia. Yukio Hatoyama, the new prime minister of Japan wants to renegotiate the relation of military forces in Japan, potentially delaying the buildup.

"It will bring a better economy for the island of Guam ... but of course there will be a negative effect. There will always be negatives when it comes to the military coming out to an island like this," Nave said.

Like Chargualaf, Nave felt many people with concerns about the buildup just need to be reassured by Obama that this shift is in their best interest.

New study

Vice Speaker Benjamin Cruz sent letters to Bordallo and the governor yesterday requesting a brand new draft Environmental Impact Statement be created to explain the buildup.

The draft EIS is a massive study that details the impacts and possibilities of the buildup. The document was released to the public in November.

According to a press release sent out yesterday, Cruz feels it is "grossly inadequate." He said the document is poorly researched and some buildup actions may violate federal laws.

"The people of Guam deserve a document on the proposed buildup that reflects truly and accurately the enormous impact that the buildup would have on their lives and on their island," he said.

Comments on the draft EIS could re-shape the military's plans for Guam. Currently the public has until Feb. 18 to submit comments, but Cruz feels the window to comment should be reset if the document is re-written.

Calvo: jobs must go to locals

Calvo: jobs must go to locals

Tuesday, 02 February 2010 00:13
Variety News Staff

(CALVO-TENORIO CAMPAIGN) -- Careers for our people was the topic of discussion among more than 500 people, who came to see to see gubernatoirla hopeful Sen. Eddie Calvo and his running mate Ray Tenorio at their latest meeting in Barrigada.

“You can count on us to be there and listen to your issues and concerns,” Calvo said. “Every time we speak directly with people, we hear about the struggles and frustrations families have. This drives us to help in any way we can.”

The conversation focused on the team’s vision for a successful and sustained economic future. Both men stress the coming military buildup is only a narrow part of the opportunity the island has to build a new, bright economy.

“Our people have shown their hard work and dedication time and time again, and that’s why they deserve the jobs of the future,” Calvo said.

“Our leaders have an opportunity to make that happen. If we seize this opportunity, we will not just have good times in the next few years, but Guam will have good times when your children are adults, and better times when your children’s children grow up.”

“There are a lot of people really struggling. We have neighbors that work two jobs just to put food on the table and keep a roof over our heads,” Tenorio said. “We want to give the best to our people – the best jobs, the best education, and the best healthcare, because that’s what you deserve, and that’s what you’ll get. This team is about the island we love and the future we want our children to be a part of.”

Chamber's support for buildup meets criticism

Chamber's support for buildup meets criticism

Posted: Feb 01, 2010 2:42 PM
Updated: Feb 01, 2010 7:32 PM

by Heather Hauswirth

Guam - The back-and-forth between the Guam Chamber of Commerce and the We Are Guahan Coalition over fourteen points in support of the military buildup has created a bit of friction between members of the island's business community and coalition members who feel that the buildup will marginalize the people of Guam. With time ticking for comments to be submitted on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and buildup plans underway, we delve into the two-step the Chamber has to dance with all the special interests.

For president of the Guam Chamber of Commerce David Leddy, the Chamber's list of fourteen reasons why Guam needs the military build up is entrepreneurial in spirit. "As with any island-based economy with very limited natural resources, our options are limited, and the military economy has always co-existed with the tourism economy so we presented the fourteen reasons simply to demonstrate the positive attributes that could be derived from its growth," he said.

However, We Are Guahan members don't see eye to eye with the Chamber. They fired back with a fourteen-point rebuttal of reasons we do not need the military buildup. The Coalition boasts some 3,000 members, including Facebook fans. Cara Flores Mays is a core member who works as a self-employed web developer.

"As a businessowner, I do stand to benefit from the buildup, however I don't think it is good for our island. There is the idea that there will be more tax revenue coming in, and of course there will be more tax revenue, but there will also be a huge increase in service demand," said Mays.

Mays says the Coalition's concerns are many, but from an economic standpoint they fear the very heart of the island's economy would be in jeopardy. "I would say there needs to be a balance between what is best for the community. I don't know how the tourists will feel about it, but we will no longer be able to promote ourselves as a family friendly destination if our red light district grows," she said.

The Chamber president meanwhile welcomes differing opinions but wants it clear that the organization is against land condemnation. "Our Chamber members are people who live and work here in Guam and make their living in Guam. The Chamber though it's the voice of the business community, the local business community- first and foremost we are an advocate for our community and we do not want the people of Guam marginalized in this buildup process," said Leddy.

Yet Mays maintains that the Chamber's math overall just doesn't add up, saying, "If you balance the increased revenue with the increased demand and that's just a small portion of it, I'm just wondering how the Chamber manages that equation and how we end up benefiting from the increased tax revenue. I'd like to see that done; I'd like to see the math done on that."

Guam call for delays in troop move

Guam call for delays in troop move

Posted at 17:08 on 31 January, 2010 UTC

Guam’s governor has asked the United States military to delay its plans to move more than 9,000 troops to the island.

Stars and Stripes Online reports a statement from Governor Felix Camacho saying he thought extending the construction timeline would lessen the overall impact on the island.

He did not offer specifics, other than to say the buildup should extend beyond 2014.

In a letter to the Navy Secretary, Ray Mabus, the Governor says there is support for the relocation of U.S. Marines from Okinawa to Guam.

However, he said it was important not to overlook the reality that Guam has a fragile territorial economy.

According to the governor’s spokeswoman, the request is not meant to signal an overall decrease in Governor Camacho’s support for the project.

But it does come as more residents and local leaders have expressed concerns about the buildup in public meetings in recent weeks.

The military transfer could result in an additional 80,000 people living in Guam’s during the height of construction.

PNC :: GEDA: Buildup Comes With Some Big Negatives

PNC :: GEDA: Buildup Comes With Some Big Negatives

Friday, 29 January 2010

Guam - GEDA Administrator Tony Blaz has submitted his top concerns over the impact of the military buildup to Senator Frank Aguon Jr.'s Committee on Economic Development.

In his letter to Aguon, Blaz lists the following impacts and concerns:

*GRT, corporate income taxes and personal income taxes could be as high as $423 in 2014 and then declining to $104 million in 2017.

*There may be a time lag between when GovGuam revenues are needed and when they are available for use.

*The buildup would generate more demands on Guam for roads, ports sewer, water, power and other infrastructure and will increase the pressure for substantial borrowing.

Read GEDA's list of concerns and impacts

*Members of the military do not spend a great deal of their income in the local economy, especially if they are housed on base and buy their groceries on base. Currently only 12% of the enlisted military income is spent on Guam.

*The average annual income of military personnel is just $29-thousand dollars. 11,182 active duty personnel translates into a total annual payroll of #323 million. Just 12% will be spent in the local economy.

*Housing for the military will be provided by the military, not the Guam private market. Local shippers and wholesaler will increase sales to the military bases but when imported goods are sold on base, most of the value of those sales won't be realized and profits won't be reinvested locally.

*There will be a "recession-like" period after 2014 when business will have to lay off workers after the peak buildup period.

*Guam workers will likely see the cot of living continue to rise faster than their incomes.

*The cost of living during the construction phase could negatively affect households on fixed incomes, although other households could benefit from rising wages.

*Hotels could benefit conssiderably, but the service sector could undergo a difficult period due to loss of labor to higher paying jobs and pressure or increased wages.

Written by : Kevin Kerrigan

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Beighley: Invest in tourism, buildup

Beighley: Invest in tourism, buildup

By Dionesis Tamondong • Pacific Daily News • January 28, 2010

When it comes to investing in the military buildup and expanding the island's tourism industry, Guam shouldn't have to choose one or the other.

Guam has the tools to balance and grow both industries, Jim Beighley, DFS Group senior vice president for Global Marketing and Market Development, told members of the Guam Chamber of Commerce.

Beighley was the keynote speaker at the Chamber's meeting at the Hyatt Regency Guam yesterday.

To revive the island's stagnant industry, the island's government and business leaders have been pursuing new tourism markets in China.

As well, the Guam Visitors Bureau is working with village mayors and other community leaders on the "We are Guam" campaign as part of its efforts to rebrand the island through authentic cultural experiences for tourists.

At the same time, the massive investments in the military buildup will inject funds into Guam's economy.

But Beighley pointed out that some elements of the buildup may conflict with tourism objectives, such as the military's proposal to limit access to some recreational and historic sites.

He said such conflicts were expected, but Guam must find a way to resolve those conflicts.

"This should not be an 'either or' discussion," he said. "Real solutions is where both sides find a way to win."

Whether it's working toward greater access to new tourism markets like China or fighting to protect Guam's culture, historic sites and natural resources in the midst of the buildup, Beighley said Guam needs to have a greater voice in Washington, D.C.

"Now more than ever, we need boots on the ground in Washington. ... It is irresponsible to think that our elected congressional official or our governor can accomplish everything on their own," he said.

He said other U.S. territories like Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands do more to lobby in the federal government.

"We are fighting for billions of dollars of investment from other states and territories who have high unemployment and massive economic problems," he said. "We are outnumbered."

Beighley made it clear that he supported the buildup, and he understood why many people have been passionate against it.

"But as we are passionately engaged in this conversation and dialogue, we must be responsible enough to come to the table with solutions," he said. "Pointing out problems is only half the discussion and we have no time right now for that."

Future of tourism on Guam clouded

Future of tourism on Guam clouded

Thursday, 28 January 2010 04:47
by Tiffany Sukola | Variety News Staff

ALTHOUGH the outlook is sunny for the tourism industry this year, tourism experts say the good news won’t last long.

“The industry is stagnant,” said senior vice president of global marketing and market development for the DFS Group, Jim Beighley yesterday during a Guam Chamber of Commerce meeting. “Guam is at a crossroads.”

The tourism industry has moved on, he said. According to Beighley, the future of tourism is in giving visitors an authentic cultural experience.

Beighley, who has helped jumpstart the tourism industries in Okinawa and Hong Kong, said Guam needs to consider changing its image.

In Okinawa he said, the Japanese island focused only on catering to its military visitors. However, once tourism officials started to change its approach to visitors, the industry picked up.

The first tourism boom happened in Tumon, Beighley said, during a time tourists were primarily interested in shopping and dining.

However, today’s visitors to Guam want to immerse themselves in the rest of the island’s natural beauty and traditions.

“All of Guam should get engaged in tourism,” said Beighley, noting that the island’s most valuable resources are its people and culture.

Although Guam’s cultural assets are its most valuable, Beighley said that unfortunately they are also the most underfunded.

Although some island residents are opposed to the upcoming military buildup, Beighley said that the buildup can be used to jumpstart the island’s ailing industry.

“On an island with limited resources, we should take every opportunity to diversify the economy,” said Beighley.

Beighley added that concentrating entirely on tourism as the island’s main source of income could be detrimental in the long run.

“It’s kind of like putting all your eggs in one basket,” he said, explaining that Guam should take advantage of the opportunities that come with the military buildup rather than object to the plans.

“I’m in favor of the military buildup,” said Beighley. “I’m in favor of the chance to promote and expand the tourism industry.”

Beighley added that the military buildup and efforts to revive the island’s main industry should go hand in hand.

He also explained that there may be conflicts as buildup plans for both sectors are occurring simultaneously.

However, Beighley said that as long as island residents pay close attention to what the military does with some pieces of land, then buildup efforts can continue without much opposition.

Beighley said that residents should be critical of the military’s plans to limit public access to land that has cultural value as well as land that already has local businesses operating on it.

“It’s not about focusing on one or the other,” he said. “It’s about finding real solutions so that both parties win.”

Editorial :: Contingency plan

Editorial :: Contingency plan

Thursday, 28 January 2010 04:21
Editorial

AT THIS point, the United States and Guam are guessing about what Japan will eventually do. Will it honor or renege on the 2006 accord that calls for the relocation of Marines from Okinawa to Guam?

Voters in Okinawa’s Nago City, where the antimilitary atmosphere has been raging, have made their sentiments known even further by electing Susumu Inanime, who campaigned on the platform to oppose the relocation of the Futenma Air Base to Nago from a more crowded part of the southern Japanese island.

The Nago voters’ decision has obviously further amplified the pressure on Japan's left-leaning government to cancel the 2006 agreement with the United States.

The United States insists on keeping the Futenma Base somewhere in Okinawa, but some Japanese politicians want the U.S. military facility out of Japan altogether.

Senator Judith Gutherz, chairman of the military buildup committee, said the possible delay in the implementation of the Marines’ relocation plan deal gives Guam the perfect chance to demand for inclusion in the planning process.

The possible postponement of the Marines’ relocation can offer relief for members of the community, who just came to realize the incredible impact of every aspect of the proposed military expansion on Guam. We can make better preparations for the troop movement in case it actually happens.

However, we recognize that this idea is premised only on the possibility of a delay in the execution of the 2006 deal.

There are two other scenarios that we must contemplate. One, the possibility of the entire Futenma force moving to Guam; and two, the likelihood that the relocation plan will not happen at all.

Right now, we are waiting to see what will happen. The United States depends on Japan’s unpredictable mood. Meanwhile, we are fence-sitting without a contingency program.

As for the first scenario, we can only hope that the United States is sensible enough to realize that Guam would not be able to absorb more troops than what was originally agreed upon. This would create a grave disaster considering the island’s limited resources.

The second scenario is something we can manage on our own if we start reflecting and developing a backup plan.

We can start with the government of Guam. Government financial planners need to come up with flexible revenue projections. Currently, projections are based on the influx of U.S. Marines and the proliferation of industries that would cater to the needs of this contingent population segment.

The entire community should take a cue from this unsteady situation and realize that we cannot always rely on outside industries—in this case, the military—to fuel our economy.

As stated in a previous editorial, it’s about time we step up efforts and meet the goal to diversify the island’s economy and enable it to survive with or without military bases.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

PNC :: Economist Discusses Recession After Buildup

PNC :: Economist Discusses Recession After Buildup

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

Guam - The Economic development subcommittee held a public meeting this afternoon on the economic impacts of the military buildup.

Former GovGuam chief economist Joe Bradley provided the subcommittee with an overview of the economic assessment conducted as part of the military's Draft Environmental Impact Statement. While many have touted the economic benefits of the military buildup the DEIS itself states that the boom of the buildup will be followed by a recession. It's referred to in the DEIS as the "boomtown effect."

Bradley says that this recession after the boom may lead to local families again leaving island for better opportunities elsewhere. He says that a similar thing happened after Guam's tourism boom and history has shown on that when this happens it's not the rich or poor that leaves but the middle class.

Written by : Clynt Ridgell

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

DEIS Perspective : What lies ahead are D.C.’s ‘pompous’ lies

DEIS Perspective : What lies ahead are D.C.’s ‘pompous’ lies

Monday, 25 January 2010 01:04
DEIS Perspective : by Tony Artero

(This is in response to Derick Hills,’ “DEIS Perspective: What lies ahead,” published in this section on Jan. 21.)

THIS draft environmental impact statement for the military buildup is with major misgivings. It is following the historic wrong “politically correct” practices and, like the mafia, it must be stop. Without changing our direction, fixing the problems, and doing everything right here on out will not be any different from the first buildup in the 1940s after World War II that left us in this dire state.

The people could not return to their once productive livelihood. The excessive land taking extinguished their chance to recover from the War.

The people were forced to start over, but under dependency upon the government for economic sustenance. The government officials’ struggle had always been in trying to create something from nothing.

Aside from the issues of war reparation and equal treatment, the economy had always been the top priority. Tourism was finally allowed after the lifting of the federal “security” restriction. The economy flourishes, but only for a few years.

I do not have any misunderstanding. No one can create something from nothing. The military economy, like tourism, come and goes without our say. Guam is now like a junky car along Marine Corps Drive. When the 80,000 people with the Marines arrive, Guam will be a bombed-out junk car with us in it.

The thinking of Guam’s strategic location is now obsolete with the militaristic technologies we have today, but Guam's "strategic location" theory is still the perfect, yet lame, excuse to continue the discrimination against Guam's indigenous people. This excuse will never put America back to work. If Guam is truly strategically located real estate for America’s defense, why abandon the Declaration of Independence? America is shooting itself in the heart.

This military buildup is the U.S. government pushing its agenda, which will not even be a window-dressing to Guam's World War II battle wounds. Guam will be overrun again.

Washington D.C. is still full of pompous lies. Okinawa is closer to the “hot spot” than Guam will ever be. Besides, Guam’s strategic location is not defending America. Just the opposite, attacks by terrorists started with the bombing in Oklahoma City on 4-19-1995, which signals the dawning of America’s downfall, but the beat goes on. The attacks on 9-11 show that America’s sword diplomacy is a failure, but the beat still goes on.

The conditions on Guam have been spiraling downward since WWII and will spin even faster with the dramatic changes this military buildup will bring to us. The United States of course thinks mainly of its own benefit. The consequences on us are of minimal concern. However, the federal deficit is sky rocketing with “security” that is more questionable and the global economy in chaos.

If there ever was a time when enlightenment was needed, it is now.

(Tony Artero, a retired submariner with the U.S. Navy, is a resident of Agana Heights.)

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Public still can comment: Dededo residents brace for changes

Public still can comment: Dededo residents brace for changes

By Brett Kelman • Pacific Daily News • January 13, 2010














Hearing: Chamorro activists raise their fists and cheer on the testimony of We Are Guahan group's Melvin Won Pat-Borja at the last public hearing on the Guam/CNMI Military Relocation draft Environmental Impact Statement. The hearing was held at Okkodo High School, yesterday. (Jacqueline Hernandez/Pacific Daily News/jhernande7)


Although the public hearings in Guam are over, residents who still want to comment on the military buildup draft Environmental Impact Statement haven't lost their chance.

You can still submit comments through the Internet or mail, and those comments will be considered the same as those that were presented publicly over the last week.

All comments must be accepted, some comments may reshape the military's plans and some comments won't get a response, retired Marine Corps Col. John Jackson, director of the Joint Guam Program Office, said last night.

"Some of them may be 'Yankee go home' and others may be 'Hey, we are glad you are here,'" Jackson said. "That doesn't really help the decision making. That part of the process of getting comments is to assist the decision-makers, ... to give them the best information from all aspects."

Population

The final hearing last night was held at the Okkodo High School gym and many residents of Dededo attended to learn more about the busy future of their village. Dededo already is the most populous village on Guam, and the coming military buildup will only congest the village even more. The buildup is estimated to bring about 80,000 more people to Guam by 2014, according to the draft Environmental Impact Study.

John G. San Nicolas worries it may be too much. With more residents on island, everyone will have to compete over limited resources, from the shady spots at the beach to the last table at a restaurant, he said.

"With just the sheer number of people on this island, being in such a small confined space, it's only natural to expect that friction is going to occur," he said. "And friction could occur in different places -- the beach, the roads, going to the mall, parties -- from the mere fact that the frequency of us meeting each other is higher."

Many of new residents who move to Guam for the buildup will end up living in the Ukudu Workforce Village, a massive housing facility with all the makings of an entire community, that will be built not far from where the hearing was held last night.

Guam-based Younex Enterprises Corp and a South Korean construction company have already agreed to work together to build the housing facility in the Harmon Annex south of the Navy's south Finegayan housing.

According to Pacific Daily News files, the facility will feed workers and transport them to their jobs and other activities. The facility will include its own 24-hour medical clinics, religious services, entertainment, laundry, banking, convenience stores and emergency services.

The entire project should be finished by 2013, when buildup-related construction is booming. San Nicolas, who lives close to where the housing will be built, worried the facility would bring no benefit to Dededo. Although the buildup promises to bolster the local economy, the facility sounds like it will create an economic vacuum, he said.

If workers in the housing will be imported, much of the money they earn will go off island, he said. And if the workers get their food, services and fun inside the facility, their earnings won't flow through the economy, he said.

"Do I think they are going to infuse that hard-earned money they get from working here into the local economy? Probably not as much," he said. "Do I see them buying any property here? No. ... Do I see them investing in the economy such as going out and shopping at Kmart or eating at Chili's? No."

San Nicolas also worried the housing facility, which will be as big as a village, could bring all the problems of a village -- including crime.

"If it's such a close community, who knows what happens in there. There could be prostitution and there could be gambling. ... If they are totally self-contained, every society has their vices," San Nicolas said.

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

PNC :: Guam & Territorial Issues In Focus At National AG Meeting

PNC :: Guam & Territorial Issues In Focus At National AG Meeting

Tuesday, 29 December 2009

Guam - Multiple issues that affect the U.S. territories in the Pacific region were addressed by Attorney General Alicia Limtiaco,

Assistant Secretary Anthony Babauta, U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Insular Affairs, and UOG President Dr. Robert A. Underwood during a recent national meeting held by the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG).

The Plenary Session titled “Issues Facing the United States Territories – Their Unique Status” was chaired by Attorney General Limtiaco and included, in addition to Babauta and Underwood, U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and Peter Hiebert, Legal Counsel, U.S. Virgin Islands Government.

The meeting marked the first time in NAAG’s history that a panel on Pacific Island issues was included in a NAAG national meeting. It was made possible after a request was made by Attorney General Limtiaco to NAAG and the Planning Committee of the 2009 Winter Meeting.

Assisting Attorney General Limtiaco in the planning and organization of the panel discussion were U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General Vincent Frazer and American Samoa Attorney General Fepulea’i Afa (Arthur) Ripley, Jr.

“The issues that Assistant Secretary Babauta, Dr. Underwood and I, along with General Frazer and Attorney Hiebert, discussed will go a long way in helping other jurisdictions better understand the unique status of Guam and other Pacific Island territories and the issues that affect them,” Attorney General Limtiaco said.

Some of the issues that were discussed by the panel included national security, the impact of the military buildup in Guam, island resources and infrastructures, the economy, trade, labor, and immigration.

The meeting served as a venue to provide information and insight to Attorney General members of NAAG on key issues that impact Pacific Island territories, which may differ from or have no application to the states.

The participation of Assistant Secretary Babauta, via video, and Dr. Underwood, via teleconference, provided other Attorneys General from all over the United States with a comprehensive overview of the challenges Guam faces in different areas, Attorney General Limtiaco said.

Assistant Secretary Babauta also spoke about matters relative to all U.S. possessions in the Pacific region, which are under the purview of the Department of Interior’s Office of Insular Affairs.

“I believe that it is through this networking and comprehension of each jurisdiction’s legal and socio-economic-related concerns that progress will continue to be made in the various areas that were discussed,” Attorney General Limtiaco said.

The National Association of Attorneys General is comprised of the Attorneys General of all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the territories of Guam, American Samoa and the Virgin Islands, and the commonwealths of the Northern Mariana Islands and Puerto Rico.

Part of NAAG’s mission is to improve the quality of legal services provided to the states and territories, as well as to facilitate communication between the states’ chief legal officers and all levels of government.

Attorney General Limtiaco is a co-chair of the NAAG Criminal Law and Youth Access to Alcohol and Drugs Committees.

AG Dr Underwood: Guam Attorney General Alicia Limtiaco, standing, and Attorneys General from various states listen to UOG President Dr. Robert Underwood via teleconference during the National Association of Attorneys General 2009 Winter Meeting. Underwood's powerpoint presentation is seen on the screen at right. The meeting marked the first time that issues affecting Guam and other pacific islands were included in the national meetings.

NAAG Winter Meeting: Guam Attorney General Alicia Limtiaco, right, Virgin Islands Attorney General Vincent Frazer, middle, and Peter Hiebert, Legal Counsel, U.S. Virgin Islands, listen as Assistant Secretary Anthony Babauta, U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Insular Affairs, speaks via video during the National Association of Attorneys General 2009 Winter Meeting. Babauta, along with UOG President Dr. Robert Underwood, were members of the "Issues Facing the United States Territories - Their Unique Status" panel, which General Limtiaco chaired. It was the first time that issues affecting pacific islands were included in the national meetings.

Written by : News Release

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Military Buildup Fact Sheet

Military Buildup Fact Sheet

LATEST VERSION, COMPLETED 5:36 p.m. 12/23/09
By: Craig Santos Perez

Guam, a possession of the United States, is one of 15 islands in the Marianas, an archipelago in the western Pacific so pristine and rich in biodiversity that it was recently designated a federally protected Marine National Monument. However, military activities are exempt from this so-called “protection” and the Department of Defense has plans to effectively destroy the natural habitats of these islands with the “Guam Military Buildup,”slated to take place over the next five years. Guam, an island only half the size of Cape Cod with a current population of 178,000, will soon become home to 80,000 additional troops, dependents and laborers, as well as a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, a missile defense system, and numerous sites for military training practices.

Though the people of these islands are being told that the Buildup will improve their quality of life, the facts below, culled from a recently released Draft Environmental Impact Statement, show otherwise.

The REAL STORY behind the Guam Military Buildup

The Military Buildup being planned for Guam and the rest of the Mariana Islands chain is being sold to us as a once-in-a-lifetime economic opportunity. But if you read the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) put out by the Department of Defense, it quickly becomes clear that this is far from the truth. And if you know your Pacific history, it is a simple connection of dots to see that the Buildup will likely be as cataclysmic for our people and environment as the atomic testing at Bikini was for the Marshall Islands.

Below are a collection of facts taken from the Draft Environmental Statement released November 20, 2009:

I. ECONOMY

Myth: The military buildup will be great for Guam’s economy.

Fact: The military’s DEIS document states that very little money will go into Guam’s economy. According to the report, most contracts will go to large off-island companies, not to local contractors. Most money spent by the 80,000 newcomers will be spent on base, at companies also based on-island, not at local businesses. The 40,000 low-paid workers imported from the Philippines will not spend their money on Guam, but will send most of it back home.

And don’t think that Guam residents will benefit from an increase in construction jobs. According to the DEIS, at the projected 2014 peak in such jobs, only 2,566 will go to Guam residents, while 15,157 will be taken by off-island workers.

In addition, the military conducted a separate report which revealed that the cost of living will rise, but wages will remain low too low to keep up with skyrocketing costs. Guam Housing Urban Renewal Authority Executive Director, Benny Pinaula, does not feel the buildup will help keep housing affordable.

How will GovGuam fare during the buildup? The costs to the Government of Guam associated with the buildup will be $2.9 Billion dollars. But GovGuam officials are uncertain as to how those projects will be paid for.

Eddie Calvo explained that the buildup will cost millions of dollars to maintain roads, to upgrade wastewater treatment and by taking revenue from the port. Calvo recently wrote that the $50 million appropriated for roads within the 2010 Defense Budget is “a drop in the bucket to what is required to expand the roads and harden bridges to handle the thousands of containers and workers that will be arriving on island.”

Calvo also pointed out that EPA has ordered the local government to spend nearly $300million dollars to develop secondary wastewater treatment facilities. Though the military will ultimately be end-users of the northern facilities, it appears that the local government will bear the brunt of the upfront costs, resulting from EPA’s edict.

According to Calvo, it has been discovered that commercial cargo has been shipping out of the Navy side of the harbor. If this trend is a portend of things to come, this may cost the local government millions of dollars in lost revenue in the years to come.

To sum things up, the military build up will NOT help local Guam businesses, will NOT provide a boon in construction jobs, will NOT be an economic boost for local Guam residents, and will cost Guam’s government millions of dollars. The fact that the DEIS was written by big defense contractors in Hawaii, not Guam, indicates where the money will go, and it is not to you and me.

II. NOT A “DONE DEAL”

Myth: The Guam Military Buildup is a “done deal.”

Fact: The Military Buildup is NOT a “done deal,” as the Pacific Daily News would have us believe. There are many variables that need to take place in order for it to happen.

The buildup depends on what Japan decides to do. The U.S. is relying on Japan building an additional base on Okinawa in order for the troops to transfer from there to Guam. They are also depending on Japan to kick in $6 billion to help fund the buildup. However, Japan doesn’t want to build another base and it has been questioning the exorbitant expenses of the buildup, such as $775,000 per housing unit. Japan could make a decision that significantly delays the buildup, or even prevents it entirely.

Especially since the economic downturn, the Pentagon, too, has been uncertain about the expenses of the buildup (see this article from as recently as May 2009: “Pentagon Reconsiders Pricey Guam Move” at http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0509/050709cdam1.htm )

The powerful Heritage Foundation, the ultra-conservative, rightwing think tank, has been behind this buildup from the start, and has been steadily lobbying Congress to spend the billions of dollars it will take to make it happen. The Heritage Foundation takes the “Manifest Destiny” view of America, that it must rule the world, rather than share the world. And yet, in December 2009, a Pew Research Center study showed that almost half of Americans think that their country should “mind its own business internationally.” No doubt, these people would be opposed to the idea that $15 billion in their tax dollars is going to the Guam buildup, devoted to the military domination of another hemisphere. If these people were even aware of the buildup, let alone if they knew where Guam was, they would object to their Congressional representatives’ greenlighting the buildup. So far, less than $1 billion has been appropriated for the colossal project. There is no guarantee that the remaining $14 billion plus will come through.

So, it isn’t a “done deal” after all. It is a future that can be shaped by the strategy and foresight of the people, starting at the grassroots.

III. WATER

Myth: There will be no problem supplying water to 80,000 new people on Guam. All we need to do is drill 22 more wells.

Fact: False. Twenty-two new wells will deplete our freshwater source. If there were enough water for that many more people, the DEIS would not have listed a desalination plant as a long-term solution. Desalination plants have adverse effects on the environment; and building one would make the people of Guam dependent on the military for the most basic resource for life – water.

If there were enough water to go around, the military would not consider the development of Tolaeyuus River (“Lost River”) in Santa Rita, either, to augment the water supply during the dry season. This would entail dredging the reservoir area of the existing dam, and installing a pump station and pipeline.

Another scheme listed in the EIS is a comprehensive dredging of Fena Lake to increase capacity. Dredging equals more environmental devastation.

The DEIS makes no guarantee of water for the estimated 260,000-plus people to be on the island. So when you run short of water, as too many of us already do in Agat, Santa Rita, Piti and Asan, just remember the old Navy saying: “The needs of the Navy come first”.

IV. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CONFLICTS

Myth: People living on the base and civilians will live together harmoniously, as “one.”

Fact: The buildup will create three distinct classes: 1) the military, who will be given expensive homes and good salaries; 2) the local people, who will be marginalized as second-class citizens and 3) 40,000 “temporary workers” who will be housed in barracks.

Billions of dollars are slated to be poured into construction inside the fence, while THERE ARE NO PLANS TO SPEND ANY MONEY OUTSIDE THE FENCE, except for road construction (not maintenance). There will be no money to help the current systems deal with infrastructure inadequacies or the expected rise in crime.

The difference between “inside the fence” and “outside the fence” will be more evident within our education system than it already is. There is already a big difference between the quality of education between the DODEA schools and local public schools. The shameful separate-but-equal ethic is alive and well on Guam, and will thrive further if the military buildup is allowed to take place.

Medical care and other social services will share similar problems. While military personnel on-island will receive better funded care, the thousands of additional people will overwhelm Guam’s already stressed medical and social services.

Meanwhile, who will monitor and enforce the labor abuse of the temporary workers, most of whom will be from the Philippines and the Federated States of Micronesia? There is already a problem regarding huge human-rights and labor abuse on Guam. Human-rights violations will most likely get worse, without adequate monitoring or enforcement. In addition, the idea that these workers are really “temporary” is a myth. Studies show that the vast majority of workers who migrate to the states from the Philippines, even on temporary visas, stay, and create families. Do not expect a population reduction after the buildup.

V. CRIME INCREASE

The huge surge of young single males, both Marines and laborers, along with the disparity between haves and have-nots, will lead to an increase in crime, fights, alcoholism, rape and prostitution. According to the DEIS, the buildup will also cause an increase in drug smuggling, due to the increased flow of goods and legal and illegal immigrants into Guam. Currently, the drug methamphetamine is already readily available on Guam, due to a steady supply from the Philippines, Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, and South Korea.

VI. STRESSED SOCIAL SERVICES

As pointed out by social worker Dr. Gerhard Schwab, social services cannot keep up with current demands. He says that currently, “children in private and public child welfare organizations experience neglect and abuse… hard-working families do not have the health care and family support they need to care for their elderly and sick family members … our best local social service professionals leave Guam because of poor working conditions and/or lack of support and resources for their work.” And that is the way things are now.

If the buildup is allowed to go forward, troubles will get worse. The workload will double, while no money or resources are being appropriated to deal with these gigantic, foreseeable problem social problems.

Peter Sgro, president of the Guam Healthcare Development Foundation, says 500-600 additional doctors, nurses, technical, management and administration professionals will be needed on Guam, should the buildup take place. Where will they come from? Currently, Guam already falls below the national average in terms of healthcare provider to general population ratio.

VII. CROWDING

Bottom line: More people, less land.

Get ready for a road system that will be a constant traffic jam of construction trucks.

The military is eyeing an additional 3,900 acres to take, including the FAA property, which was supposed to have been given back. The total amount of land they want is one and a half times the size of Barrigada.

Regarding population increase: at first, the DOD told residents that the buildup would increase the population by 40,000, though they were always aware that the figure was really 80,000 — double that! Unfortunately, no one told the people of Guam until the last possible moment – the day the EIS was released (November 20, 2009). Why did they wait so long? Maybe because they knew how upsetting this information would be.

Currently, the cap on H-2B temporary workers allowed to enter the country is only 66,000 for the entire United States. But on tiny Guam, that cap for such workers has been lifted. Instead of protecting the island from a surge of migrants, the government is encouraging a dangerous population spike. Clearly, no consideration was given to living conditions, resources or infrastructure on Guam. All that is considered important to project planners is to get the military facilities up and running – no matter what are the human, social or environmental costs.

VIII. RACIST ATTITUDES

According to the Draft EIS, the transplanted Marines will not have an impact on Guam’s overall crime and social order. Instead the report blames migrants from the Federated States of Micronesia as the likely cause. This blatantly racist mindset behind the planning of Guam’s future is deplorable and goes against everything America stands for.

And racism will continue to flourish as the buildup’s planned social stratification takes hold, with predominantly Caucasian military personnel living in the most comfort inside the fence, while Pacific Islanders live outside the fence in lesser conditions, or outright squalor. It is tragically ironic that people native to the region are the ones to be relegated to the worst housing, the worst education system, the worst medical facilities, and the lowest wages. As 80,000 new people are dumped on Guam to fall into their preordained caste in this new “planned community” of Apartheid, the Buildup will exponentially accelerate the denigration of Pacific Islanders in their own land.

IX. NO MORE GREEN SPACE

Most of the four- and two- lane roads in the north will be widened to six- and seven-land highways.

The greenery in the north will be removed, not just for road work, but to house many of the 80,000 new people. One hundred acres of jungle will be replaced by a camp for tens of thousands of low-wage laborers. More jungle will be razed to make way for the luxury military homes. These homes will be soundproofed to protect those inside from the noise of the new landing pad. Local homes just outside the gate will not have such sound protection.

X. NOISE

Aside from the harrowing noise of helicopters coming and going, the racket of weapons firing from the firing range will plague much of the island. A 2000 study from Asahikawa Medical College shows that aircraft-noise exposure resulted in a range of physical and mental consequences including sleep disorders, hearing loss, higher rates of low birth weight infants, fatigue, neurosis, and negative effects on children.

XI. NO MORE ACCESS TO NATURE

According to the impact study, “There are several recreational resources that the public would lose the access to, and the use of the features if the proposed action were implemented: Guam International Raceway, Marbo Cave, Pagat Trail and associated trails near it, cultural gathering activities (suruhana), and off-shore fishing near Marbo Cave.”

The DEIS spends chapters detailing their plans for creating “recreation space” for their dependents. They go on about how important it is to make sure that there is lots of “wide, open, green space” within their neighborhoods. In the mean time, they are taking away OUR recreation space. They are lessening the wide, open, green space in OUR neighborhoods. And what does the DEIS say to try to make things better? It actually says we should replace our outdoor culture with indoor physical fitness centers, and indoor recreational resources such as bowling, skating rink, youth center, theater and recreational pavilion. Do they really think that bowling is an acceptable substitute for traditional fishing practices? Can they really be that culturally insensitive? And even if people wanted to go bowling instead of fishing, what makes them think local people would be able to afford such diversions, as the cost of living skyrockets against their low wages?

XII. STRESSED INFRASTRUCTURE

As 80,000 newcomers create waste and stress on our utilities and roads, the local people must cope with the burdened electrical system, continual road maintenance, limited water supply and thousands of tons of additional sewage. As mentioned earlier, funding for the Guam Buildup does not include any financial support for infrastructure outside the fence.

XIII. DESTRUCTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES

The DEIS states that cultural heritage sites to be destroyed or compromised include locations at Apra Harbor, Anderson AFB, Orote Field, Anderson South, and a sizable portion of land south of Route 15. As described in the report, a parcel of land at Anderson Air Force Base that is rich in archaelogical artifacts will be subject to “100-percent disturbance.” In addition, it warns of increased vandalism at the historical coastal site of Haputo, rich with latte stones.

XIV. THE DESTRUCTION OF PAGAT

The limestone forest that stretches from Marbo Caves to Pagat Caves is being considered for use as a firing range, where the military can practice shooting and bombing. The land belongs to several families who have been caring for it for decades, choosing to not develop because they prize the land for its inherent values. Their efforts to keep the land pristine have made it more desirable for the military. The site in Pagat is registered at the Department of Historic Preservation as an archaeological site.

XV. THE DESECRATION OF MOUNT JUMULLONG MANGLO

This holy mountain, where thousands of island residents pilgrimage every year on Good Friday, is also being considered for use as a firing range. This is disrespectful of local Chamorro traditions.

XVI. DESTRUCTION OF REEF AND FISHING IN APRA HARBOR

Twenty-five acres of reef is slated to be dredged. The sediment churned up by the dredging will kill the coral that is not plowed up and the fish population. According to Manny Duenas, president of the Fisherman’s Co-op, the dredging will “affect Guam in itself because we know the fish don’t just live in one area.”

Destruction to Guam’s undersea life will take place through regularly scheduled underwater detonations as part of war games training.

XVII. LARGEST MANGROVE FOREST ON U.S. SOIL DESTROYED

The dredging at Apra Harbor will destroy the mangrove forest there.

XVIII. SEA TURTLE AND SPINNER DOLPHIN HABITAT DESTROYED

The green sea turtle, the Hawksbill sea turtle and the Spinner dolphin, all protected by federal law, will be wiped out in Apra Harbor.

We are trading endangered species and their ecosystems for a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.

XIX. REMOVAL OF DUKDUK TREES; DECIMATION OF IFIT TREES

The ifit tree is the official tree of Guam, traditionally used as timber, for fuel wood and craftsman art. The termite-resistant hardwood has completely disappeared from some parts of southeast Asia already and is increasingly harder to find on Guam. Construction eyed for Finegayan at Andersen South, and a firing range would decimate the critically-endangered ifit trees, says the DEIS. The construction would also require the removal of dukduk trees, a traditional resource used by canoe builders.

XX. DESTRUCTION OF NATIVE MEDICINAL PLANTS

The hundreds of acres of jungle to be destroyed or contaminated contains native plants used in traditional medicine. To destroy these plants is to destroy Guam’s Chamorro heritage.

XXI. HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC WASTE

The total amount of hazardous waste produced by the increased military presence will equal 8 tons per year! (according to the DEIS)

The DEIS refuses to disclose all of the toxic and hazardous materials they will be storing; this is most likely because they are radioactive and banned from the shores of most countries. Our island is still in the process of decontaminating land and removing toxic materials left behind by the military; and many older generations of Guamanians suffer from an abnormally high cancer rate resulting from previous exposure to radiation by the military.

XXII. DEPLETION OF REEF RESOURCES BY H-2 WORKERS

What little reef resources are left may be quickly depleted by the underpaid foreign workers who tend to comb the reefs for food.

XXIII. WILL AFFECT THE ENTIRE MARIANA ARCHIPELAGO

The Guam Buildup does not affect only Guam. It will have grave, irreversible consequences for the entire island chain. The military does not see the Mariana Islands as a biodiverse treasure of natural wonders that the U.S. has even designated a protected Marine National Monument (“protected” from everyone except the military). Rather, the military sees our islands as a gigantic shooting gallery, which they’ve aptly re-named the Mariana Islands Range Complex (MIRC). Guam will be where the soldiers will live; the MIRC will be their enormous playground where they will learn how to destroy life.

The MIRC area will encompass about 501,873 square nautical miles to include open ocean and coastal areas. The combined land area on Guam, Rota, Tinian, Saipan, and Farallon de Medinilla to be used for training areas and facilities will be about 64 nautical miles, and approximately 63,000 nautical miles of airspace will be designated as Special Use Airspace. Already bombing practice occurs routinely on Farallon de Medinilla, an island not long ago prized by locals for its excellent fishing. Now it is off-limits and contaminated, worsening by the day.

Stopping the Guam Buildup will “cut off the head of the snake” that would otherwise kill or severely diminish the celebrated reef and land ecologies of the rest of the archipelago. According to the Population Reference Bureau, only 30% of Guam’s natural habitat remains. But that sad statistic is not shared by the rest of the islands in the chain, still plentiful in biological diversity.

The spectacularly beautiful and ecologically rich island of Tinian would be hardest hit, if we let this happen. Tinian is home to many endemic species, including the Tinian Monarch, an endemic bird. The DEIS explains that the military intends to use two-thirds of the island to routinely conduct many hazardous activities, including live-fire training (which leaves behind depleted uranium and other highly toxic materials), various pyrotechnics and detonations both on land and underwater, and amphibious landings (heavy, lumbering tanks crushing the thriving reef as well as destroying the sea-turtle nesting areas on the beach). No species will be left undamaged. These activities will decimate one of the healthiest and most biologically diverse marine ecosystems on the planet, thus also destroying an important food source for its Pacific Island inhabitants.

In addition to the destruction caused by bombs, tanks, planes, ships and nuclear and hazardous wastes, the islands will also suffer from opportunists “cashing in” on the sudden inflow of a large demographic of single males looking for “rest and relaxation.” As on Guam, we can safely predict a rise in prostitution, illegal drugs, and crime. On Rota – pristine and undeveloped; an authentic “tropical paradise” — the construction of two hotel-casinos are in the works, in anticipation of the Guam Buildup becoming a reality.

As you can see from these facts presented in the military’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement, the Guam Buildup is a recipe for nothing short of social and ecological disaster. Please do what you can to stop it.

Here is an interesting observation from blogger Dave Owen (www.guamblog.com):

“The Draft Environment Impact Statement (DEIS) wasn’t written to protect Guam. It was written to protect the U.S. government from criticism once things go wrong on Guam. The U.S. will say that the 11,000 page DEIS is evidence of its great concern and care for Guam. It’s just the opposite. It’s a pile of data and observation dumped on the island far too late, and Guam has been given precious little time – just 90 days – to respond to it. The buildup, as the DEIS illustrates, impacts every aspect of the island; the environment, land use and development, schools, health care, crime, roads — the sum of Guam’s quality of life. With the DEIS in hand, Guam’s government must now prioritize the buildup’s impact and then prepare mitigation strategies. It’s a Manhattan Project-sized task and one that’s impossible to complete in the amount of time available. Guam can rest assured that the U.S. will use the DEIS as its defense when things go wrong: We prepared you, Guam.”