Showing posts with label Navy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Navy. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Buildup Master Plan May Change

WEDNESDAY, 31 AUGUST 2011 02:15 BY JANELA BUHAIN | VARIETY NEWS STAFF

ASSISTANT Secretary of the Navy Jackalyne Pfannenstiel confirmed to Senator Judi Guthertz that the Guam military buildup plan will likely be different than what is reflected in the 2010 Record of Decision.

Pfannenstiel was responding to Guthertz’s requests for a copy of the current draft plan for review, which, according to Guthertz, has been “circulating for months in Washington.”

According to a press release from Guthertz, the Navy had originally said the finalized plan would be released in early July, following a congressional mandate. The General Accounting Office has been given a draft of the master plan, Guthertz said.

However, Guthertz said that according to Pfannenstiel, changes may be made before the new document is finalized and released to the public, due to the budgetary climate in Congress.

Pfannenstiel said the Navy’s commitment to possessing less land after the buildup than before would “require further adjustments to land-use plans.”

“Although it may not reflect the current state of play and potential future adjustments, we are willing to discuss with you the draft [master plan] associated with the decisions memorialized in the [Record of Decision],” Pfannenstiel wrote.

In response, Guthertz said that “more than ever, we must engage the [Department of Defense] and other federal stakeholders on all buildup plans to ensure the best interests of the people of Guam are met. I welcome Secretary Pfannenstiel’s offer and hope to review the draft plan with her as soon as possible.”

Opportunity

“We view this as a continued opportunity to offer Guam’s input to a process that is too often closed until decisions are made,” Guthertz said. “We’ll keep pushing until we achieve that ‘win-win’ outcome for all the parties involved in the buildup.”

Earlier this month, U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, R-OK, publicly stated he wants to cancel the military buildup and close Department of Defense-funded schools.

Coburn presented his “Back in Black” plan to save $69.5 billion by reducing military spending overseas, including Guam.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Navy Refuses to Allow Public Testimony at EIS Scoping Meeting on Navy Expansion Plans

Navy Refuses to Allow Public Testimony at EIS Scoping Meeting on Navy Expansion Plans

August 27, 2010 by kyle from dmzhawaii.org


Jim Albertini of Malu ‘Aina sent the following report from the Navy public scoping meetings in Hilo regarding planned expansion of its training and range complex in the Pacific. The new control tactic of the military has been to use stations with information and subject matter “experts” to answer questions rather than hold public hearings where the public may hear each others’ questions and comments. Hawai’i has a rich oral cultural tradition; the “information station” format fails to allow for sufficient public participation. The Navy is conducting another environmental impact statement (EIS) for its range activities mainly because it has to renew its “take” permit under the National Marine Mammal Protection Act. They figured that they might as well make changes to their plans while they are at it. NOAA’s website for marine mammal protection permits issued is:http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications. On this page there are a number of Navy range complexes and other activities. The Southern California and Hawaiian Range permits are midway down the table. You can find annual reports there as well.

The meeting on O’ahu was also highly controlled. The Navy provided virtually no information about the proposed changes to their activities, making it impossible for the public to effectively comment on the scope of the project. What we have found out is that there will be more minesweeping training, meaning more active sonar use. This is the worst sonar for whales. Also, they plan to bring Joint Strike Fighters (F35) and Littoral Combat Ships (LCS, a cousin of the Hawaii Superferry) to train in Hawai’i.

And the Navy’s failure to hold public hearings denies meaningful public participation. Please submit comments on the website: http://www.hstteis.com/GetInvolved/OnlineCommentForm.aspx

Or by mail:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest
Attention: Mr. Kent Randall – HSTT EIS/OEIS
1220 Pacific Highway, Building 1, Floor 5
San Diego, CA, 92132

They do not provide a way to fax or submit email comments.

If the folks from Maui and Kaua’i can send their reports, we’ll post them. Mahalo.


Saturday, February 20, 2010

Merging bases turns out to be not so simple and not so cost effective

Merging bases turns out to be not so simple and not so cost effective

By Charlie Reed, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition, Wednesday, February 17, 2010

YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan — The idea behind a 2005 plan to streamline the military is seemingly simple: Merge Army Post X with nearby Naval Base Y and let the savings begin.

But combining 26 neighboring Army, Navy and Air Force installations — located in the continental United States and the Pacific — into 11 joint bases and one joint region is proving far from simple and even farther from reducing costs.

Military estimates of potential savings over the next 20 years already have dropped significantly since 2005, from $2.3 billion to $273 million, according to a 2009 Government Accountability Office report.

Four joint bases and Joint Region Marianas became operational in October and the other seven follow suit this year.

The joint basing plan focuses on consolidating base support services — such as building maintenance, gate security and child care — to increase purchasing power and reduce potential overlaps in the work force.

The problem, according to the GAO, is that the Pentagon raised standards for joint bases that require them to fully fund support services — a practice rarely accomplished at traditional bases as the military attempts to reduce non-war spending.

Most commanders can keep costs down at their bases with measures such as reducing gym hours or postponing building renovations. But commanders of joint bases have no such flexibility.

The higher standards and the funding mandate “put a limit on how much you can save at joint bases,” said Navy Capt. Richard Kitchens, who is leading efforts at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, where a gate that for decades separated Naval Station Pearl Harbor and Hickam Air Force Base was removed Jan. 31 in anticipation of their official merge in October.

And along with higher-than-expected administrative costs — at least in the short term — and the loss of efficiencies some merging bases will experience by no longer being part of their services’ regional operations, it is “unclear whether joint basing will result in any actual savings,” the GAO report states.

Meanwhile, military leaders at the joint bases have put reducing costs on the back burner as they continue sorting out how to combine manpower and adapt to each other’s distinct military cultures and business practices.

“We’re still making sure we’re not going to impact the mission,” Kitchens said. “We’re going to do this right and then worry about the savings.”

The joint bases are expected to save money by joining forces for contracted goods and services and ultimately eliminating duplicate jobs, though the Pentagon has stopped short of mandating they do so for now.

“We’re reasonably a couple of years away from achieving savings, if there are any to be achieved,” said Steve Wolborsky, chief of Andersen Air Force Base’s development office on Guam.

Andersen and Naval Base Guam are the only two installations that combined to form a joint region rather than a joint base. One service at each of the other joint bases takes ownership of the installation, while Navy and Air Force commanders on Guam retain responsibility for their respective bases but are now considered Joint Region Marianas.

The base mergers are part of the 2005 Base Closure and Realignment Act, or BRAC — sweeping legislation intended to make the military more efficient.

The collective BRAC measures also are expected to save less than had been planned in 2005, dropping from $36 billion to $13.7 billion, the GAO reported in an earlier 2009 report.

Bordallo challenges DEIS

Bordallo challenges DEIS

Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:37
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff

Congressional report lists flaws of the draft study

THE military buildup must be delayed, Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo said last night, acknowledging that the draft environmental impact statement has serious deficiencies that need to be addressed.

In her congressional report to the people, Bordallo identified six areas of concern regarding the draft study, including and the Navy’s desire to acquire additional private and public lands.

“We will challenge the Navy to conduct the military buildup on their existing land. The Navy should better utilize its land and consider moving housing and some support facilities for the Marine aviation unit to Andersen Air Force Base,” Bordallo said.

Secondly, an area of concern is the proposed firing range at Pagat and Sasayan. “If private property owners choose not to lease or sell their land I will support them and oppose any effort by the Department of Defense to use eminent domain to acquire that land. I recognize the input of private landowners and the organization ‘We Are Guahan’ on this issue.

A third area of concern is the proposed alternative for an aircraft carrier transient berth in Apra Harbor. “The plans for the carrier berth in Apra Harbor will result in a significant loss of coral. I will challenge the Navy to identify other alternatives that will minimize coral damage and that will take advantage of currently dredged areas such as Kilo or Delta wharves among others. I thank Senator Guthertz for her input,” said the congresswoman.

Fourth, she noted the need for federal assistance for improving civilian infrastructure on Guam to support the military buildup.

“While the DEIS draft report recognizes the need to improve civilian infrastructure it does not provide a clear strategy that details how the federal government will assist Guam,” Bordallo said as she opposed the Navy’s plan to drill 22 new wells in the north “until an independent assessment is made about the capacity of the northern aquifer.”

The fifth area of concern is the lack of a comprehensive plan for the housing of guest workers and providing for their health care needs in a manner that does not further overwhelm Guam’s local infrastructure and health care system.

“Let me be clear about this issue – we must do all that we can to train our local workforce and hire them before we utilize guest workers. Any proposal to house guest workers outside the gates must address their impact on civilian infrastructure such as water, wastewater and power. We cannot allow guest worker housing off-base to cause the faucets to run dry or power outages in our homes.”

Socioeconomic

Finally, Bordallo said, the socioeconomic portion of the draft study must be completely rewritten “in order to truly address the socioeconomic impacts of the military buildup.”

She said she will encourage the Navy to work closely with the University of Guam, the Guam Community College and the Department of Chamorro Affairs to develop a better understanding of the cultural issues and to formulate a comprehensive plan to support programs which preserve and promote Chamorro culture and language and I thank Fuetsan Famaloan for this input.”

On the issue of war claims, Bordallo said that she has made significant progress and that “we are closer than ever to passing this bill and we will continue to build on our progress.”

Bordallo spoke strongly on Guam’s quest for self-determination saying that Guam must refocus on the process to achieve decolonization and improve its political status with the U.S.

Projects

Bordallo also said she was concerned about the one of the assumption in the draft impact report that all projects will be completed by 2014.

“It would not be an exaggeration to say that this draft EIS has done more harm than good. The DEIS has not accurately identified the impacts on Guam and it has exaggerated some impacts based on a false assumption that all projects will be completed by 2014,” said the congresswoman.

“This flawed assumption has drawn consequences and conclusions that are not sustainable and not supported by anyone. Nobody wants 80,000 additional people on Guam in 2014,” Bordallo said. “We will do everything that we can, federally and locally, to stop that from happening. As I said before, we have our foot on the brakes. I will not support appropriations and authorizations that will result in a construction pace that brings 80,000 people to Guam in 2014.”

DEIS comment period expires tomorrow

DEIS comment period expires tomorrow

Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:33
by Zita Y. Taitano | Variety News Staff

GUAM residents have until 3 p.m. tomorrow to submit their comments on the draft environmental impact statement, upon expiration of the 90-day public review and comment that officially started on Nov. 21 last year.

The Record of Decision is expected to be issued in August.

Senator Ben Pangelinan wants to see the final draft of the document to see if changes are made to include public input. “Then we would submit comments on the final draft for the final copy,” he said.

There were two ways for residents to submit their comments, whether it was to submit on line on the impact study’s website www.guambuildupeis.us or to do download the comment form the site and mail it to the Joint Guam Program Office courtesy of the Naval Facilities headquarters in Hawaii.

The latter of which must be postmarked on Feb. 17 in order for the comment document to be included with the thousands of other comments on the study.

The original time frame for the comment period was 45 days, but was extended to 90 days after concerns were raised that the allotted time was not enough for residents to fully digest the 11,000-page document and express their thoughts.

Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo has requested the Department of Navy to extend the comment period further, but the congresswoman received no response.

Senator Judi Guthertz, chairman of the military buildup committee at the legislature, yesterday sent another installment of comment paper, in which she emphasized the billions of dollars that Guam needs in order to adequately prepare itself for the military buildup.

“Only minimal assistance has been forthcoming from the federal government, which has placed this unfunded mandate upon 178,000 American citizens living on a tiny island of only 212 square miles,” said Guthertz.

Once all the comments have been received at the NAVFAC Pacific, they will be reviewed and put together for the final draft copy.

Residents who would like to send their comments via regular mail can send them to the following address JGPO c/o NAVFAC Pacific, 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3134 ATTENTION: GMPO. Again, all comments mailed out by Wednesday should have it postmarked Feb. 17.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Bid for DEIS comment extension snubbed

Bid for DEIS comment extension snubbed

Tuesday, 16 February 2010 00:57
by Zita Y. Taitano | Variety News Staff

CONGRESSWOMAN Madeleine Bordallo’s request for extension of the comment period for the draft environmental impact statement appears to have been ignored.

“We did write the letter, but we just haven’t had any answer,” Bordallo said.
“The deadline is approaching you know and we don’t have any answer on the extension.”

The deadline for the comments to be turned in is this Wednesday at midnight eastern standard time or Thursday 3 p.m. Guam standard time.

Bordallo sent the request letter to Department of the Navy Secretary Ray Nabus late last year.

Joint Guam Program Office’s spokesman, Major Neil Ruggiero, said that any response regarding the request would have to come directly from the Department of the Navy.

Former Navy Secretary B.J. Penn, who is on island to attend Bordallo’s congressional address today and Gov. Felix Camacho’s state of the island address yesterday, in the past when questions regarding the impact study came up, the Navy always replied.

“We want to make sure it’s done correctly and if we happen to cut it off prematurely it doesn’t serve anyone to do that and this is a huge draft environmental impact study. We had 86 separate studies,” Penn said. “So we’re at least trying to make it done right and I’m sure that if a request has been made, they’re trying to everything in their power.”

Penn noted that the funding for the impending military buildup is on its way to Guam and the Department of Defense is trying to complete the study as quickly as possible.

Friday, February 12, 2010

Guthertz: Carrier Should Use Kilo Warf Rather Than Dredge Coral

Guthertz: Carrier Should Use Kilo Warf Rather Than Dredge Coral

Tuesday, 09 February 2010

Guam - Rather than dredge 36 acres of coral in Apra Harbor, Senator Judi Guthertz is proposing that the Navy continue to use Kilo Warf for any visiting Aircraft Carriers, and then moor ammunition ships out in Apra Harbor.

Visiting carriers currently use Kilo Warf, located near the tip of Orote Point, near Gab Gab Beach, but its primary purpose is for loading and off-loading ammunition.

However, the military's Draft Environmental Impact Statement argues that a separate berthing is now needed because of plans to extend the stay of visiting aircraft carriers to a total of 63 days a year and that would interfere with the "munitions mission" of Kilo Wharf.

Read Guthertz's Coment Paper on Aircraft Carrier Berthing
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/pdf/gutpap.pdf

But in a "Comment Paper on Aircraft Carrier Berthing", Guthertz counters that "the assertion that the situation will become too difficult is not proven. It merely comes down to a matter of having a scheduling challenge."

In a release, the Chairperson of the Legislature's Buildup Committee, argues that: “The solution is to moor the ammunition ship at one of the deep draft buoys in outer Apra Harbor, where the Maritime Pre-position Ships (MPS) moor, whenever there is an overlap in their schedules. "

Guthertz says “This location for the ammunition ship would only be needed for those days when the aircraft carrier is moored to Kilo Wharf. The aircraft carriers would still be able to visit Guam at an enhanced frequency and duration compared to now.”

The Senator says it would be "a 'win-win' soultion for both.

"The aircraft carriers would have more ship visit days in Guam as desired by the military, and the coral would remain untouched as desired by the civilians.”

Written by : News Release

Thursday, February 11, 2010

120-day stretch for DEIS review period sought

120-day stretch for DEIS review period sought

Friday, 05 February 2010 00:51
by Mar-Vic Cagurangan | Variety News Staff

THE new activist group called “We Are Guahan” has launched an online petition asking the Department of Defense to extend the review and comment period for the draft environmental impact statement by 120 days.

The Guam community was given 90 days to review and respond to the 11,000-page draft study releases in November. Under the current schedule, the comment period expires on Feb. 17.

The official request for extension was made earlier by Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo to Department of Navy Secretary Ray Mabus. The Navy official has yet to respond to the request.

“As evident in recent [draft environmental impact statement] hearings, concerns about land acquisition among other critical issues have emerged. Given this 90 day commenting period, the people of Guam have not been given adequate time and resources to comment on the Department of Defense's plans to increase its land inventory, especially when the Land Acquisition Impact,” states the petition, which has 394 signatures so far.

The petitioners are targeting 1,000 signatures for the petition.

“One of the many issues local Guam residents are concerned about is the measures the military will take to acquire the additional lands they seek to complete their mission,” the petition said.

We Are Guahan noted that the draft study uses “vague language, making it unclear to private landowners whether or not the military would seek to negotiate with landowners instead of resorting to the use of eminent domain and/or land condemnation.”

This petition “calls for the military to reveal to the public their plans to acquire land and to extend the period of time residents have to review and respond to said plan.”

To sign up or view the petition stats online go to: www.thepetitionsite.com/1/call-for-transparency-and-extension-of-deis-commenting-period.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Army to station high-speed vessels to Guam

Army to station high-speed vessels to Guam

Thursday, 04 February 2010 02:50
by Tiffany Sukola | Variety News Staff

GUAM is one of the locations where the U.S. Army wants to station and operate 12 Joint High Speed Vessels.

Military officials are asking government agencies as well as island residents to provide feedback before drafting a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the stationing of the vessels.

A joint project between the Army and Navy, the vessels are small, high-speed ships that can carry troops, vehicles and supplies among the world’s waterways. Each vessel can carry about 600 short tons and travel at an average speed of 35 knots.

The Army is considering stationing at least 12 of these vessels at various ports including Virginia, San Diego, Seattle-Tacoma, Pearl Harbor and Guam. Additional ports around the world are also being considered to hold the high-speed crafts.

Comments identifying environmental issues and concerns regarding the presence and operation of the high speed vessels will be accepted until March 5.

A published advertisement said the copy of the Army’s notice of intent was posted on www.aec.army.mil, but Variety’s attempt to find the link failed.

Wednesday, February 03, 2010

Cruz supports efforts to delay buildup start

Cruz supports efforts to delay buildup start

Tuesday, 02 February 2010 00:23
by Zita Y. Taitano | Variety News Staff

VICE speaker BJ Cruz supports Gov. Felix Camacho’s request for the Department of Navy to delay the start of the military buildup.

Cruz affirmed his support in a letter he sent yesterday to the governor.

“Your action serves to confirm the fears that many of our residents have regarding the buildup, that it’s too much, too soon,” Cruz stated in his letter.

He also sent a similar letter to Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo.

Cruz noted that after reviewing the 11,000-page draft environmental impact statement, he realized that the draft study doesn’t really address the military buildup’s impact on the community.

With this in mind, Cruz said a revised military impact study should be prepared and take “into account the comments made on the existing documents.”

The revised version, he added, must be made available for public review before a record of decision is made on the final version.

He also asked that Camacho and Bordallo submit such a request to the Secretary of the Navy since it would have direct affect on the island.

“The people of Guam deserve to be assured that a DEIS on the proposed buildup reflects truly and accurately the impact that the buildup would have on their lives,” he concluded.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Buildup team urges more questions

Buildup team urges more questions

By Laura Matthews • Pacific Daily News • January 21, 2010

The last round of Gov. Felix Camacho's presentations on the draft Environmental Impact Statement attracted a number of young people seeking to learn more about the changes to affect the island.

Thousands of pages from the draft EIS were summarized by the governor's Advisory Consultant Team in just a few hours yesterday at the Mangilao Senior Citizens Center.

Residents have until Feb. 17 to submit comments on the draft EIS, which will reshape Guam in the coming years. Their comments on the document could affect the actions the military carries out on the island, as public comments will be taken into consideration as the Defense Department moves forward.

"I think it is good for young people to come so that we can be a little more informed," said Tiara San Augustin, 19.

The Agana Heights resident said she decided to show up after her friends told her about a history class they took at the University of Guam. She said the teacher invited her friends to pay attention to these hearings and listen for the consequences of the military moving to the island.

"I don't see the big picture, and that is why I am here," San Augustin said.

Tamuning resident Gina De Guzman, 20, also wants to see the big picture.

"I don't know much about what's going on," she said. "I feel like the culture might change a lot. It is different from America and a lot of people coming here will change the localized things."

The coming military buildup will bring approximately 80,000 people to Guam by 2014. The influx of people would affect every sector on Guam ranging from public safety to utilities.

Celeste Werner, the program manager for the governor's Advisory Consultant Team, reminded residents who have questions on the draft EIS to provide an effective comment that generates action. Comments should be specific -- residents should explain how the proposed action would affect them and should provide solutions, she said.

The draft EIS was released Nov. 20 for public viewing and contains vital information on how every aspect of life on Guam will change during the military buildup.

The Department of the Navy is preparing the draft to assess the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed military activities. The Navy is the lead agency for preparation of the draft EIS.

The proposed actions are complex, multiservice projects involving components of the U.S. Marine Corps, Navy and Army, according to the Department of Defense. Each volume in the nine-volume draft EIS evaluates a discrete portion of the proposed actions.

Residents have until Feb. 17 to comment, but Guam's delegate and the legislative vice speaker say Guam needs more time to provide input.

Vice Speaker Benjamin Cruz and Delegate Madeleine Bordallo both have written letters in support of extending the amount of time residents can comment. Bordallo sent a letter to Navy Secretary Ray Mabus asking for a 45-day extension. The Navy has yet to respond to the request.

Generally, federal rules provide the public 45 days to review a draft EIS before a final statement is published as a Record of Decision in the Federal Register. However, the Navy department, at the request of Guam officials, extended the public comment period for the Guam draft EIS an additional 45 days.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

CNMI echoes Guam

CNMI echoes Guam

Monday, 18 January 2010 03:44
by Gemma Q. Casas | Variety News Staff

Rota, Saipan public hearings raise concerns over buildup


Saipan—CNMI residents welcomed the idea of increasing the U.S. military’s presence in the Marianas but some expressed concerns over the consequences of the move on the environment and the socioeconomic landscape of the islands.

Last week, the U.S. Department of the Navy led a series of open house/public hearings on Saipan and Rota about the draft environmental impact statement for the Guam and CNMI Military Relocation project.

The relocation of the American troops, believed to be the largest since after the Vietnam War would cost both governments up to $10 billion.

The movement of the troops and their estimated 9,000 dependents would require massive construction of new facilities to house them and provide their regular drills and exercises.

The CNMI’s third largest island, Tinian, is envisioned to host a “warm base.” Two thirds of Tinian’s public lands or about 15,353 acres are leased to the military which plans to use them for live-fire ranges and other training activities.

At the public hearing on Saipan last Friday, Benigno Sablan, former secretary of the CNMI Department of Lands and Natural Resources, said he has concerns about the dredging activities of the military that may affect activities of boat enthusiasts and fishermen.

He also raised concern about the definition of air space which the U.S. military intends to utilize to further train air force personnel and their allied forces.

Richard Seman, former director of the Division of Fish and Wildlife, said local access to fishing areas must be defined. He also urged military officials to look into the PCB contamination in other villages on Saipan.

Martin Manglona, former Covenant Party chairman and a military veteran, said a so-called “maneuver damage” should be established to afford residents and the CNMI government reimbursements in case of destruction on their properties by military activities.

Theresa Arriola of Saipan said the public has not been given enough time to study the impact of the military buildup project.

She said the indigenous people of the CNMI are not given proper considerations for what would become of their islands.

“We have to stand up and be proud of who we are. It is not intended to benefit our islands,” she said.

Victoria-Lola Leon Guerrero of Guam said the people of the Marianas are being treated like second-class citizens in their own lands. “Comments are powerless. We are not making the final decision. They are. It needs to be on our terms. Until then, we would continue to die. My alternative is no action. Enough is enough,” she said at the public hearing.

Manglona, however, countered the public should not be hasty in making judgments against the military.

“Before we jump into any conclusion, let’s see what they have [to offer]. Let’s not get into scare tactics. Let’s be fair that’s all I am asking,” he said.

Commerce Deputy Secretary Sixto Igisomar urged the military to be more transparent and keep the public informed.“Please communicate with the people. Give us time,” he said. “If you want us to help you, please keep us informed.”

Igisomar also noted that the CNMI’s uninhabited volcanic island of Pagan which has rich deposits of pozzolan, a cement additive, should be tapped when the construction phase in Guam begins to help jumpstart the CNMI’s economy. “Make use of us to help you. Give opportunities to our contractors. We want to make sure that we all grow together,” he added.

Former House representative Manuel Tenorio, for his part, urged the military to work with the people of the commonwealth. He noted that a lot of the locals are educated people but most of them have not been given opportunities.

With the military buildup in the offing, he expressed hope that it would open up more opportunities for the locals. “We’re not second-class citizens. We’re good as anybody else. This island is drying up. Please listen to the local people,” he said.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

CNMI public invited to hearings on Guam buildup

CNMI public invited to hearings on Guam buildup

Saipan Tribune
Tuesday, January 12, 2010

The CNMI Military Integration Management Committee is encouraging the public to participate in the upcoming Joint Guam Program Office public hearings that are scheduled for Tinian on Thursday, Jan. 14, 2010,, and Saipan on Friday, Jan. 15, 2010.

The MIMC Coordinator, Tom Linden, will be on hand at both of these public hearings to answer any questions in regards to how the CNMI is dealing with the regional military buildup.

These meetings will be an introduction to the draft Environmental Impact Statement that has been prepared for both Guam and the CNMI.

While the CNMI government understands the complexity of the document that is to be commented on, the MIMC office encourages active participation.

In an effort to ensure that the community has an opportunity to fully digest the contents contained in the EIS, the MIMC, in partnership with Office of Economic Adjustment and the Guam Advisory Consulting Team, will be hosting a public forum on Jan. 27, 2010, at the Multi-Purpose Center in Susupe.

Representatives of the OEA and ACT will break down the 11,000 page EIS and be willing to answer any questions in regards to the military buildup in the region. The hearings will introduce the public to the EIS and allow them time to review and comment prior to the public forum, which will be held on Jan. 27.

The MIMC public forum will also be broadcast to both Tinian and Rota through a VTC provided by the Northern Marianas College and IT&E, and the MIMC and Department of Commerce will have representatives on Tinian and Rota to help answer any questions. The public is encouraged to submit questions ahead of time to the MIMC Coordinator by e-mailing them to cnmi.mimc@commerce.gov.mp.

The MIMC was created through a Charter in June 2009 to serve as the planning and policy making entity for all activities that relate to the expansion of military training and other defense transformation initiatives in the CNMI and Guam. The CNMI-MIMC is the official entity through which the CNMI will interface with the Department of the Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, JGPO, Department of Defense, and all other military representatives in regards to the military buildup. The policymaking committee is chaired by Gov. Benigno Fitial and consists of the Governor, Lt. Governor, Senate President, Speaker of the House, and the mayors of Rota, Tinian, Saipan, and the Northern Islands.

“Due to the overwhelming scope of this military relocation, the MIMC realizes that the path to success for our region will require a partnership with Guam and both Governor Fitial and Guam Gov. Felix Camacho have pledged their support of one another to ensure that the entire region benefits,” said the committee in a statement. (PR)

Monday, January 04, 2010

US military buildup in Guam

US military buildup in Guam

The U.S. military plans to redeploy thousands of Marines and their families to Guam from the Japanese island of Okinawa.


Story by Akiko Fujita for PRI's "The World"

The population of Guam is expected to increase by 50 percent in the next four years. That's because the U.S. military plans to redeploy thousands of Marines and their families from the Japanese island of Okinawa. The move could bring an economic boom to the Pacific island but it threatens to strain Guam's infrastructure.

The US and Japan agreed to the troop transfer three years ago, to reduce US troop presence in Okinawa.

Joe Arnett with the Guam Chamber of Commerce says the move will transform the island. "This investment into Guam in unprecedented. Guam has never seen this level of investment into the island ever before."

Arnett expects the military buildup to create 30,000 new jobs on the island. Many will be temporary construction jobs filled by foreign workers. But Arnett says high paying; permanent jobs will stay in the community.

It sounds like a good opportunity for an island struggling with eight percent unemployment. But Senator Judi Guthertz says Guam isn't ready to shoulder the load.

"We're not going to be ready unless resources are made available to the civilian community," said Guthertz.

Guthertz oversees the legislative committee for the military buildup. She supports the Marine transfer, but says the American government isn't doing enough to support Guam.

While the US and Japan has pledged 10 billion dollars for the buildup itself, they haven't guaranteed large investments in the civilian communality. Guthertz says that's a concern in light of a recent environmental impact statement. It said the buildup will attract tens of thousands to the island, perhaps as much as a 50 percent jump in a few years.

Guthertz says the US government isn't playing fair, because Guam is only a US territory. "We don't vote for presidents, we don't have voting representatives in the Senate, we have a non-voting delegate to the US Congress. So our political rights are frankly quite limited."

Guam's problems boil down to infrastructure. The waste water treatment plant can't handle a large population. The roads aren't wide enough to handle many cars. There is just one port and the shipments there are expected to jump from 100,000 containers to 600,000 in just a few years.

At Guam Memorial Hospital, the island's only civilian hospital, chief planner William Condo [PH] says he's already near capacity. "We know that we are not big enough right now to not only handle the population for normal operations, but what if a major disaster happens?"

The military already owns a third of the island, and the Marines aren't the only unit expanding. The Army is building a missile defense system; the Air Force is adding more drones; the Navy is expanding its port to house more aircraft carriers.

Victoria-Lola Leon Guerrero teaches at the University of Guam. She says the buildup threatens the native Chamorro culture that dates back four thousand years. She's rallying the community to oppose the military's plans.

"A lot of Chamorro families will be losing their land," said Leon Guerrero. "There will be 2,300 acres of land taken for this military build up if their plans go accordingly."

The military government says it’s sensitive to the community's concerns. Public Affairs Officer, Captain Neal Ruggiero says the Defense Department has consulted the governor, legislators and community leaders throughout the process. He also says the government is securing funds to help improve the island's infrastructure.

Senator Guthertz says Guam didn't have a say in the decision to bring Marines to the island, but the community can speak out next month. The military will host public hearings on their proposed plans before signing off on Guam's future.

"One this report is report and signed off on, it's an open license for the United States military to do whatever they want to do on Guam," said Guthertz. "So the only time we have to influence what will happen here, and happen to us, is now."

PRI's "The World" is a one-hour, weekday radio news magazine offering a mix of news, features, interviews, and music from around the globe. "The World" is a co-production of the BBC World Service, PRI and WGBH Boston.

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Navy to fence off Tinian training sites

Navy to fence off Tinian training sites

Tuesday, 29 December 2009 04:07
by Jude Lizama | Variety News Staff

THE proposed training sites on Tinian will be fenced to ensure public safety during exercise, according to the draft environmental impact statement.

A total of five security gates would be constructed as part of the proposed action. However, the draft study states that the location of security gates would “not vary with alternative.”

“There would be relatively the same potential characteristics for closure and availability under all action alternatives,” the draft statement said.

The military is enhancing three training facilities on Tinian in preparation for training activities of U.S. Marines who will be relocated from Okinawa to Guam.

Danger zones

A similar component of all three alternatives is the inclusion of surface danger zones; and the development of rifle known distance, automated combat pistol/multipurpose firearm qualification course, platoon battle course, and field firing live fire training ranges.

According to the impact statement, the primary difference among alternatives is the location and orientation of the firing ranges and “associated notional surface danger zones.”

Under the “alternative 1”—the preferred option—all four proposed ranges would be located in the south-central portion of the military lease area within the area delineated by 8th Avenue, 90th Street and Broadway.

Additionally, all alternative 1 live fire range footprints would partially overlay the Federation Aviation Administration mitigation area, and all associated danger zones would “extend over the FAA mitigation area, DoD ‘s “No Wildlife Disturbance” Mount Lasso escarpment area and a segment of Broadway.

The preferred alternative “was evaluated to ensure it met the purpose and need “to locate U.S. military forces within a timely response range to meet international agreement and treaty requirements and to fulfill U.S. national security policy requirements to provide mutual defense, deter aggression, and dissuade coercion in the Western Pacific Region.”

Awaiting ROD

The study states that the U.S Navy will not make its decision on a final alternative “until the Record of Decision is signed” at the conclusion of the National Environmental Policy Act process.

Alternative 2 proposes a northeast range alignment that avoids the FAA mitigation area and Mount Lasso escarpment area for its field firing range. Its associated danger zones extend over the ocean.

Out of all three proposals, alternative 3 proposes to situate three of four ranges at the military lease area’s southern boundary, which keeps three of four range footprints out of the FAA mitigation area. If implemented, layout plans of alternative 3 affect the least amount of surface area.

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Military Buildup Fact Sheet

Military Buildup Fact Sheet

LATEST VERSION, COMPLETED 5:36 p.m. 12/23/09
By: Craig Santos Perez

Guam, a possession of the United States, is one of 15 islands in the Marianas, an archipelago in the western Pacific so pristine and rich in biodiversity that it was recently designated a federally protected Marine National Monument. However, military activities are exempt from this so-called “protection” and the Department of Defense has plans to effectively destroy the natural habitats of these islands with the “Guam Military Buildup,”slated to take place over the next five years. Guam, an island only half the size of Cape Cod with a current population of 178,000, will soon become home to 80,000 additional troops, dependents and laborers, as well as a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, a missile defense system, and numerous sites for military training practices.

Though the people of these islands are being told that the Buildup will improve their quality of life, the facts below, culled from a recently released Draft Environmental Impact Statement, show otherwise.

The REAL STORY behind the Guam Military Buildup

The Military Buildup being planned for Guam and the rest of the Mariana Islands chain is being sold to us as a once-in-a-lifetime economic opportunity. But if you read the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) put out by the Department of Defense, it quickly becomes clear that this is far from the truth. And if you know your Pacific history, it is a simple connection of dots to see that the Buildup will likely be as cataclysmic for our people and environment as the atomic testing at Bikini was for the Marshall Islands.

Below are a collection of facts taken from the Draft Environmental Statement released November 20, 2009:

I. ECONOMY

Myth: The military buildup will be great for Guam’s economy.

Fact: The military’s DEIS document states that very little money will go into Guam’s economy. According to the report, most contracts will go to large off-island companies, not to local contractors. Most money spent by the 80,000 newcomers will be spent on base, at companies also based on-island, not at local businesses. The 40,000 low-paid workers imported from the Philippines will not spend their money on Guam, but will send most of it back home.

And don’t think that Guam residents will benefit from an increase in construction jobs. According to the DEIS, at the projected 2014 peak in such jobs, only 2,566 will go to Guam residents, while 15,157 will be taken by off-island workers.

In addition, the military conducted a separate report which revealed that the cost of living will rise, but wages will remain low too low to keep up with skyrocketing costs. Guam Housing Urban Renewal Authority Executive Director, Benny Pinaula, does not feel the buildup will help keep housing affordable.

How will GovGuam fare during the buildup? The costs to the Government of Guam associated with the buildup will be $2.9 Billion dollars. But GovGuam officials are uncertain as to how those projects will be paid for.

Eddie Calvo explained that the buildup will cost millions of dollars to maintain roads, to upgrade wastewater treatment and by taking revenue from the port. Calvo recently wrote that the $50 million appropriated for roads within the 2010 Defense Budget is “a drop in the bucket to what is required to expand the roads and harden bridges to handle the thousands of containers and workers that will be arriving on island.”

Calvo also pointed out that EPA has ordered the local government to spend nearly $300million dollars to develop secondary wastewater treatment facilities. Though the military will ultimately be end-users of the northern facilities, it appears that the local government will bear the brunt of the upfront costs, resulting from EPA’s edict.

According to Calvo, it has been discovered that commercial cargo has been shipping out of the Navy side of the harbor. If this trend is a portend of things to come, this may cost the local government millions of dollars in lost revenue in the years to come.

To sum things up, the military build up will NOT help local Guam businesses, will NOT provide a boon in construction jobs, will NOT be an economic boost for local Guam residents, and will cost Guam’s government millions of dollars. The fact that the DEIS was written by big defense contractors in Hawaii, not Guam, indicates where the money will go, and it is not to you and me.

II. NOT A “DONE DEAL”

Myth: The Guam Military Buildup is a “done deal.”

Fact: The Military Buildup is NOT a “done deal,” as the Pacific Daily News would have us believe. There are many variables that need to take place in order for it to happen.

The buildup depends on what Japan decides to do. The U.S. is relying on Japan building an additional base on Okinawa in order for the troops to transfer from there to Guam. They are also depending on Japan to kick in $6 billion to help fund the buildup. However, Japan doesn’t want to build another base and it has been questioning the exorbitant expenses of the buildup, such as $775,000 per housing unit. Japan could make a decision that significantly delays the buildup, or even prevents it entirely.

Especially since the economic downturn, the Pentagon, too, has been uncertain about the expenses of the buildup (see this article from as recently as May 2009: “Pentagon Reconsiders Pricey Guam Move” at http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0509/050709cdam1.htm )

The powerful Heritage Foundation, the ultra-conservative, rightwing think tank, has been behind this buildup from the start, and has been steadily lobbying Congress to spend the billions of dollars it will take to make it happen. The Heritage Foundation takes the “Manifest Destiny” view of America, that it must rule the world, rather than share the world. And yet, in December 2009, a Pew Research Center study showed that almost half of Americans think that their country should “mind its own business internationally.” No doubt, these people would be opposed to the idea that $15 billion in their tax dollars is going to the Guam buildup, devoted to the military domination of another hemisphere. If these people were even aware of the buildup, let alone if they knew where Guam was, they would object to their Congressional representatives’ greenlighting the buildup. So far, less than $1 billion has been appropriated for the colossal project. There is no guarantee that the remaining $14 billion plus will come through.

So, it isn’t a “done deal” after all. It is a future that can be shaped by the strategy and foresight of the people, starting at the grassroots.

III. WATER

Myth: There will be no problem supplying water to 80,000 new people on Guam. All we need to do is drill 22 more wells.

Fact: False. Twenty-two new wells will deplete our freshwater source. If there were enough water for that many more people, the DEIS would not have listed a desalination plant as a long-term solution. Desalination plants have adverse effects on the environment; and building one would make the people of Guam dependent on the military for the most basic resource for life – water.

If there were enough water to go around, the military would not consider the development of Tolaeyuus River (“Lost River”) in Santa Rita, either, to augment the water supply during the dry season. This would entail dredging the reservoir area of the existing dam, and installing a pump station and pipeline.

Another scheme listed in the EIS is a comprehensive dredging of Fena Lake to increase capacity. Dredging equals more environmental devastation.

The DEIS makes no guarantee of water for the estimated 260,000-plus people to be on the island. So when you run short of water, as too many of us already do in Agat, Santa Rita, Piti and Asan, just remember the old Navy saying: “The needs of the Navy come first”.

IV. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CONFLICTS

Myth: People living on the base and civilians will live together harmoniously, as “one.”

Fact: The buildup will create three distinct classes: 1) the military, who will be given expensive homes and good salaries; 2) the local people, who will be marginalized as second-class citizens and 3) 40,000 “temporary workers” who will be housed in barracks.

Billions of dollars are slated to be poured into construction inside the fence, while THERE ARE NO PLANS TO SPEND ANY MONEY OUTSIDE THE FENCE, except for road construction (not maintenance). There will be no money to help the current systems deal with infrastructure inadequacies or the expected rise in crime.

The difference between “inside the fence” and “outside the fence” will be more evident within our education system than it already is. There is already a big difference between the quality of education between the DODEA schools and local public schools. The shameful separate-but-equal ethic is alive and well on Guam, and will thrive further if the military buildup is allowed to take place.

Medical care and other social services will share similar problems. While military personnel on-island will receive better funded care, the thousands of additional people will overwhelm Guam’s already stressed medical and social services.

Meanwhile, who will monitor and enforce the labor abuse of the temporary workers, most of whom will be from the Philippines and the Federated States of Micronesia? There is already a problem regarding huge human-rights and labor abuse on Guam. Human-rights violations will most likely get worse, without adequate monitoring or enforcement. In addition, the idea that these workers are really “temporary” is a myth. Studies show that the vast majority of workers who migrate to the states from the Philippines, even on temporary visas, stay, and create families. Do not expect a population reduction after the buildup.

V. CRIME INCREASE

The huge surge of young single males, both Marines and laborers, along with the disparity between haves and have-nots, will lead to an increase in crime, fights, alcoholism, rape and prostitution. According to the DEIS, the buildup will also cause an increase in drug smuggling, due to the increased flow of goods and legal and illegal immigrants into Guam. Currently, the drug methamphetamine is already readily available on Guam, due to a steady supply from the Philippines, Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, and South Korea.

VI. STRESSED SOCIAL SERVICES

As pointed out by social worker Dr. Gerhard Schwab, social services cannot keep up with current demands. He says that currently, “children in private and public child welfare organizations experience neglect and abuse… hard-working families do not have the health care and family support they need to care for their elderly and sick family members … our best local social service professionals leave Guam because of poor working conditions and/or lack of support and resources for their work.” And that is the way things are now.

If the buildup is allowed to go forward, troubles will get worse. The workload will double, while no money or resources are being appropriated to deal with these gigantic, foreseeable problem social problems.

Peter Sgro, president of the Guam Healthcare Development Foundation, says 500-600 additional doctors, nurses, technical, management and administration professionals will be needed on Guam, should the buildup take place. Where will they come from? Currently, Guam already falls below the national average in terms of healthcare provider to general population ratio.

VII. CROWDING

Bottom line: More people, less land.

Get ready for a road system that will be a constant traffic jam of construction trucks.

The military is eyeing an additional 3,900 acres to take, including the FAA property, which was supposed to have been given back. The total amount of land they want is one and a half times the size of Barrigada.

Regarding population increase: at first, the DOD told residents that the buildup would increase the population by 40,000, though they were always aware that the figure was really 80,000 — double that! Unfortunately, no one told the people of Guam until the last possible moment – the day the EIS was released (November 20, 2009). Why did they wait so long? Maybe because they knew how upsetting this information would be.

Currently, the cap on H-2B temporary workers allowed to enter the country is only 66,000 for the entire United States. But on tiny Guam, that cap for such workers has been lifted. Instead of protecting the island from a surge of migrants, the government is encouraging a dangerous population spike. Clearly, no consideration was given to living conditions, resources or infrastructure on Guam. All that is considered important to project planners is to get the military facilities up and running – no matter what are the human, social or environmental costs.

VIII. RACIST ATTITUDES

According to the Draft EIS, the transplanted Marines will not have an impact on Guam’s overall crime and social order. Instead the report blames migrants from the Federated States of Micronesia as the likely cause. This blatantly racist mindset behind the planning of Guam’s future is deplorable and goes against everything America stands for.

And racism will continue to flourish as the buildup’s planned social stratification takes hold, with predominantly Caucasian military personnel living in the most comfort inside the fence, while Pacific Islanders live outside the fence in lesser conditions, or outright squalor. It is tragically ironic that people native to the region are the ones to be relegated to the worst housing, the worst education system, the worst medical facilities, and the lowest wages. As 80,000 new people are dumped on Guam to fall into their preordained caste in this new “planned community” of Apartheid, the Buildup will exponentially accelerate the denigration of Pacific Islanders in their own land.

IX. NO MORE GREEN SPACE

Most of the four- and two- lane roads in the north will be widened to six- and seven-land highways.

The greenery in the north will be removed, not just for road work, but to house many of the 80,000 new people. One hundred acres of jungle will be replaced by a camp for tens of thousands of low-wage laborers. More jungle will be razed to make way for the luxury military homes. These homes will be soundproofed to protect those inside from the noise of the new landing pad. Local homes just outside the gate will not have such sound protection.

X. NOISE

Aside from the harrowing noise of helicopters coming and going, the racket of weapons firing from the firing range will plague much of the island. A 2000 study from Asahikawa Medical College shows that aircraft-noise exposure resulted in a range of physical and mental consequences including sleep disorders, hearing loss, higher rates of low birth weight infants, fatigue, neurosis, and negative effects on children.

XI. NO MORE ACCESS TO NATURE

According to the impact study, “There are several recreational resources that the public would lose the access to, and the use of the features if the proposed action were implemented: Guam International Raceway, Marbo Cave, Pagat Trail and associated trails near it, cultural gathering activities (suruhana), and off-shore fishing near Marbo Cave.”

The DEIS spends chapters detailing their plans for creating “recreation space” for their dependents. They go on about how important it is to make sure that there is lots of “wide, open, green space” within their neighborhoods. In the mean time, they are taking away OUR recreation space. They are lessening the wide, open, green space in OUR neighborhoods. And what does the DEIS say to try to make things better? It actually says we should replace our outdoor culture with indoor physical fitness centers, and indoor recreational resources such as bowling, skating rink, youth center, theater and recreational pavilion. Do they really think that bowling is an acceptable substitute for traditional fishing practices? Can they really be that culturally insensitive? And even if people wanted to go bowling instead of fishing, what makes them think local people would be able to afford such diversions, as the cost of living skyrockets against their low wages?

XII. STRESSED INFRASTRUCTURE

As 80,000 newcomers create waste and stress on our utilities and roads, the local people must cope with the burdened electrical system, continual road maintenance, limited water supply and thousands of tons of additional sewage. As mentioned earlier, funding for the Guam Buildup does not include any financial support for infrastructure outside the fence.

XIII. DESTRUCTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES

The DEIS states that cultural heritage sites to be destroyed or compromised include locations at Apra Harbor, Anderson AFB, Orote Field, Anderson South, and a sizable portion of land south of Route 15. As described in the report, a parcel of land at Anderson Air Force Base that is rich in archaelogical artifacts will be subject to “100-percent disturbance.” In addition, it warns of increased vandalism at the historical coastal site of Haputo, rich with latte stones.

XIV. THE DESTRUCTION OF PAGAT

The limestone forest that stretches from Marbo Caves to Pagat Caves is being considered for use as a firing range, where the military can practice shooting and bombing. The land belongs to several families who have been caring for it for decades, choosing to not develop because they prize the land for its inherent values. Their efforts to keep the land pristine have made it more desirable for the military. The site in Pagat is registered at the Department of Historic Preservation as an archaeological site.

XV. THE DESECRATION OF MOUNT JUMULLONG MANGLO

This holy mountain, where thousands of island residents pilgrimage every year on Good Friday, is also being considered for use as a firing range. This is disrespectful of local Chamorro traditions.

XVI. DESTRUCTION OF REEF AND FISHING IN APRA HARBOR

Twenty-five acres of reef is slated to be dredged. The sediment churned up by the dredging will kill the coral that is not plowed up and the fish population. According to Manny Duenas, president of the Fisherman’s Co-op, the dredging will “affect Guam in itself because we know the fish don’t just live in one area.”

Destruction to Guam’s undersea life will take place through regularly scheduled underwater detonations as part of war games training.

XVII. LARGEST MANGROVE FOREST ON U.S. SOIL DESTROYED

The dredging at Apra Harbor will destroy the mangrove forest there.

XVIII. SEA TURTLE AND SPINNER DOLPHIN HABITAT DESTROYED

The green sea turtle, the Hawksbill sea turtle and the Spinner dolphin, all protected by federal law, will be wiped out in Apra Harbor.

We are trading endangered species and their ecosystems for a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.

XIX. REMOVAL OF DUKDUK TREES; DECIMATION OF IFIT TREES

The ifit tree is the official tree of Guam, traditionally used as timber, for fuel wood and craftsman art. The termite-resistant hardwood has completely disappeared from some parts of southeast Asia already and is increasingly harder to find on Guam. Construction eyed for Finegayan at Andersen South, and a firing range would decimate the critically-endangered ifit trees, says the DEIS. The construction would also require the removal of dukduk trees, a traditional resource used by canoe builders.

XX. DESTRUCTION OF NATIVE MEDICINAL PLANTS

The hundreds of acres of jungle to be destroyed or contaminated contains native plants used in traditional medicine. To destroy these plants is to destroy Guam’s Chamorro heritage.

XXI. HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC WASTE

The total amount of hazardous waste produced by the increased military presence will equal 8 tons per year! (according to the DEIS)

The DEIS refuses to disclose all of the toxic and hazardous materials they will be storing; this is most likely because they are radioactive and banned from the shores of most countries. Our island is still in the process of decontaminating land and removing toxic materials left behind by the military; and many older generations of Guamanians suffer from an abnormally high cancer rate resulting from previous exposure to radiation by the military.

XXII. DEPLETION OF REEF RESOURCES BY H-2 WORKERS

What little reef resources are left may be quickly depleted by the underpaid foreign workers who tend to comb the reefs for food.

XXIII. WILL AFFECT THE ENTIRE MARIANA ARCHIPELAGO

The Guam Buildup does not affect only Guam. It will have grave, irreversible consequences for the entire island chain. The military does not see the Mariana Islands as a biodiverse treasure of natural wonders that the U.S. has even designated a protected Marine National Monument (“protected” from everyone except the military). Rather, the military sees our islands as a gigantic shooting gallery, which they’ve aptly re-named the Mariana Islands Range Complex (MIRC). Guam will be where the soldiers will live; the MIRC will be their enormous playground where they will learn how to destroy life.

The MIRC area will encompass about 501,873 square nautical miles to include open ocean and coastal areas. The combined land area on Guam, Rota, Tinian, Saipan, and Farallon de Medinilla to be used for training areas and facilities will be about 64 nautical miles, and approximately 63,000 nautical miles of airspace will be designated as Special Use Airspace. Already bombing practice occurs routinely on Farallon de Medinilla, an island not long ago prized by locals for its excellent fishing. Now it is off-limits and contaminated, worsening by the day.

Stopping the Guam Buildup will “cut off the head of the snake” that would otherwise kill or severely diminish the celebrated reef and land ecologies of the rest of the archipelago. According to the Population Reference Bureau, only 30% of Guam’s natural habitat remains. But that sad statistic is not shared by the rest of the islands in the chain, still plentiful in biological diversity.

The spectacularly beautiful and ecologically rich island of Tinian would be hardest hit, if we let this happen. Tinian is home to many endemic species, including the Tinian Monarch, an endemic bird. The DEIS explains that the military intends to use two-thirds of the island to routinely conduct many hazardous activities, including live-fire training (which leaves behind depleted uranium and other highly toxic materials), various pyrotechnics and detonations both on land and underwater, and amphibious landings (heavy, lumbering tanks crushing the thriving reef as well as destroying the sea-turtle nesting areas on the beach). No species will be left undamaged. These activities will decimate one of the healthiest and most biologically diverse marine ecosystems on the planet, thus also destroying an important food source for its Pacific Island inhabitants.

In addition to the destruction caused by bombs, tanks, planes, ships and nuclear and hazardous wastes, the islands will also suffer from opportunists “cashing in” on the sudden inflow of a large demographic of single males looking for “rest and relaxation.” As on Guam, we can safely predict a rise in prostitution, illegal drugs, and crime. On Rota – pristine and undeveloped; an authentic “tropical paradise” — the construction of two hotel-casinos are in the works, in anticipation of the Guam Buildup becoming a reality.

As you can see from these facts presented in the military’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement, the Guam Buildup is a recipe for nothing short of social and ecological disaster. Please do what you can to stop it.

Here is an interesting observation from blogger Dave Owen (www.guamblog.com):

“The Draft Environment Impact Statement (DEIS) wasn’t written to protect Guam. It was written to protect the U.S. government from criticism once things go wrong on Guam. The U.S. will say that the 11,000 page DEIS is evidence of its great concern and care for Guam. It’s just the opposite. It’s a pile of data and observation dumped on the island far too late, and Guam has been given precious little time – just 90 days – to respond to it. The buildup, as the DEIS illustrates, impacts every aspect of the island; the environment, land use and development, schools, health care, crime, roads — the sum of Guam’s quality of life. With the DEIS in hand, Guam’s government must now prioritize the buildup’s impact and then prepare mitigation strategies. It’s a Manhattan Project-sized task and one that’s impossible to complete in the amount of time available. Guam can rest assured that the U.S. will use the DEIS as its defense when things go wrong: We prepared you, Guam.”

Monday, December 21, 2009

Navy divers remove 15 tons of rocks from Saipan channel

Navy divers remove 15 tons of rocks from Saipan channel

Tuesday, December 22, 2009
By Haidee V. Eugenio

The U.S. Navy has so far removed some 15 tons of “dangers to navigation” like corals and rock formations from the Saipan channel, a project which the Saipan Chamber of Commerce says will allow more and bigger military ships to make port visits to the island and therefore boost local tourism.

At least 10 more tons of these underwater obstructions are expected to be removed in the next few weeks.

The ongoing project is done by 17 divers from the U.S. Navy's Mobile Diving and Salvage Unit 1 Company 1-7 out of San Diego, California, along with personnel from the USNS Safeguard.

This is the third time this year that the U.S. Navy has undertaken this kind of project in the CNMI.

Leading the team are officer-in-charge Lt. Michael Simmons, and CO 1-7 master diver Randy Saunders.

“Divers are working hard to clear the dangers to navigation in the Tanapag harbor entrance. Our end goal is to provide safe access to more classes of Navy ships. As a result, more sailors will be able to enjoy the beautiful island of Saipan,” Simmons said.

The team arrived here on Nov. 23, and the project is expected to be completed by the end of January 2010.

Saunders, in an interview aboard the docked USNS Safeguard yesterday afternoon, said the main priority of this mission is the removal of five “dangers to navigation” in the main Saipan channel.

“They're much larger than the ones in the past. We have to deal with them a little different from what the groups in the past were doing,” Saunders said.

Saunders, who used to be stationed in Guam, said the goal is to have a depth of at least 36 feet, “which will then allow larger vessels to enter the port,” including destroyers and guided missile cruisers.

He said the biggest they have removed so far weighs some 10 tons or some 20,000 lbs.

“On some of these dangers to navigation, we only needed to take off 4 to 18 inches off of it, instead of bringing out the whole thing because they're so massive. They cover such a large area that some of the techniques that we are using were never tried in the past,” he added.

Douglas Brennan, a member of the Saipan Chamber of Commerce's Armed Forces Committee, said clearing the Saipan channel up to 36 feet would mean bigger ships with a deep draft would be able to safely navigate the Saipan channel or the Tanapag harbor, and therefore boost the island's tourism.

“It opens up the ports to more diversified commerce,” Brennan said in a phone interview.

He said since the Saipan Chamber of Commerce started tracking U.S. military ships' arrival in 1997, the island has so far received some 51,000 military visitors.

While the CNMI's main tourism markets are Japan and Korea, along with China and Russia, the islands also cater to U.S. military personnel who are here for rest and recreation. The choice of Saipan is mostly because of its status as a U.S. territory, safe location, and natural beauty.

Most of the U.S. Navy divers involved in the ongoing removal of dangers to navigation are on Saipan for the first time.

One of them, Ben Gyger, from San Diego, California, described the place as a “beautiful island.”

“The local people are very kind to us,” said Gyger, who has been with the U.S. Navy for nine years. He said the team “has put in a lot of hours at sea” as part of the mission, but has also made time to enjoy what Saipan has to offer visitors.

In January this year, 15 U.S. Navy divers also aboard the USNS Safeguard removed over 40 tons or 80,000 lbs of corals and rock formations-the biggest U.S. Navy project of its kind so far on Saipan.

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Navy Says Service Members On Guam Won't Get Housing Bump

Navy Says Service Members On Guam Won't Get Housing Bump

Written by Michael Rudolph, Guam News Factor Writer
Thursday, 17 December 2009 13:01

GUAM - Members of the armed forces stationed on Guam will reportedly not benefit from the average 2.5% increase in housing allowance rates for 2010.

Guam service members are under the Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) program, which according to Guam Navy Housing has not been informed by Washington of any housing allowance increases for 2010.

The Department of Defense issued a press release yesterday to announce that close to one million men and women serving in the armed forces and stationed in the 50 U.S. States will receive an average increase of $37 (2.5%) to their monthly housing allowances.

The 2.5% increase to the Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) Program for 2010 marks the smallest increase in the program's history. This is because "Rates are set based on actual housing data, so as the economy has declined, vacancy rates have increased [and] rental prices have declined, which results directly to lower BAH rates in various areas," according to the statement made by DoD BAH program analyst Cherly Anne Woehr reported by the American Forces Press Service.

But, according to Woehr's assessment, big cities in the U.S. may account for the overall bump.

Typically, rates are higher in larger, more heavily populated metropolitan areas, such as New York City, Chicago and Washington, D.C. Rates in rural areas usually are more stable, and although they may increase to some degree, the rise doesn't have the same impact as in larger cities.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Lack of consultation results in wrong info

Lack of consultation results in wrong info

Tuesday, 15 December 2009 00:40
by Mar-Vic Cagurangan | Variety News Staff

THE draft environmental impact statement contains some inaccurate information about Guam because military planners failed to engage local participation during the assessment process, according to Henry Simpson, president of Guam Racing Federation.

Simpson pointed specifically to the proposed layout of the Marines’ firing range project on Route 15, which marked the Yigo Raceway Park as an “abandoned raceway park.”

“No one even bothered to ask me if it is indeed abandoned. Have they consulted us, they would have found out that the Yigo raceway is not an abandoned facility,” Simpson said.

“I wasn’t aware of this map layout until somebody came up to me and said ‘sorry that you’re going to lose the race park.’ That had me concerned,” he added.

The Navy is seeking to secure undeveloped properties on Route 15, commonly known as “Andy South,” to build a training complex for live and inert munitions practice and that requires safety buffers, known as surface danger zones and special use airspace. The properties are also being eyed as a possible site for aviation training and exercises for landing and takeoffs.

Most of the properties in the target area are part of the Chamorro Ancestral Lands Commission’s inventory. The racing federation is leasing a government property where the race track is situated.

Simpson said the raceway federation is seeking audience with the Navy officials to discuss possible options that include allowing the race track to stay in the area, which is a safe distance away from the firing direction.

“We can be good neighbors. We’re tying to get the military to embrace the race track as a recreation for troops who will come to Guam,” Simpson said.

But the military must propose a relocation site for the race track if it is bent on acquiring the property where the race facility is located, Simpson said.

“If they really need this area, we are willing to move out. But they should come up with a mitigation plan. Unfortunately, no one is talking to us,” Simpson said. “We don’t want this to be an adverse issue with the military but we don’t want them to run us over.”

Navy eyes Lost River for additional water supply

Navy eyes Lost River for additional water supply

Tuesday, 15 December 2009 00:30
by Jude Lizama | Variety News Staff

THE military is considering the possible development of Tolaeyuus River in Santa Rita—also known as the “Lost River” – to provide additional supply to the Navy’s water system during the dry season, according to the draft environmental impact statement.

A U.S. Geological Survey estimated the river could supply 1.7 to 5.6 millions gallons per day during the dry season, but may be “limited by downstream habitat considerations.”

The draft impact study provides a blueprint for the military’s realignment strategy on Guam, outlining all options to address the island’s water infrastructure and near-capacity levels that require alternative approaches for the future.

If the military decides to undertake this river project, the initiative would result in the rehabilitation of the existing cofferdam, dredging of its reservoir area, and installation of a pump station and discharge pipeline to distribute water supply to the existing Fena Reservoir pump station.

In addition to $200 million in upgrades planned for the Guam Waterworks Authority islandwide system for potable water and wastewater, the impact study lists desalination, Fena dredging and the undeveloped river resource as options under consideration.

Desalinization, or desalination, is comprised of several processes that remove excess salt and other minerals from water. It is another longterm alternative defense department planners are strongly considering to meet their projected water needs.

“In the event that the supply from freshwater wells is insufficient,” the impact study states, the desalination process could replace the development of as many as 31 new water wells at the air force base and in Barrigada.

A third option proposed by the study is more comprehensive dredging of Fena lake to increase capacity at the reservoir.

However, the impact statement states additional assessment is required to “address potential obstacles related to mobilizing a dredge over long distances to the project site, which is in a remote location, as well as logistical difficulties in managing dredged material on Guam.”

The military planners’ preferred alternative is the construction of 22 potable water supply wells at Andersen Air Force Base, rehabilitation of existing wells, more comprehensive integration with GWA and the construction of a 5 million gallon water storage tank at Finegayan.