Guam calls for transfer of U.S. Marines from Okinawa to be delayed
Feb 17 02:28 AM US/Eastern
WASHINGTON, Feb. 17 (AP) - (Kyodo) — The congresswoman who represents Guam in the U.S. House of Representatives said Tuesday that the 2014 deadline for completing the planned transfer of about 8,000 U.S. Marines from Okinawa to the Pacific island should be delayed so that the island can better prepare for the upcoming surge in population.
"One of the most troubling aspects of the draft environmental impact statement (for the military buildup on Guam) is that all assumptions are based on projects being completed by 2014," Democrat Madeleine Bordallo said in an address to Guam's legislature. The text of her speech was made available on her website.
"This flawed assumption has drawn consequences and conclusions that are not sustainable and not supported by anyone," Bordallo said.
In addition to relocating about 8,600 Marines and 9,000 family members from the southernmost Japanese prefecture, the buildup plan for the island includes the establishment of an Army Missile Defense Task Force and the construction of a wharf for use by the U.S. Navy's nuclear-powered aircraft carriers.
According to a recent report by Stars and Stripes, a Pentagon- authorized newspaper for U.S. military personnel overseas, the buildup calls for "adding nearly 80,000 people to Guam's 178,000 population during the height of construction in 2014." The 80,000 is believed to include a large number of temporary workers who will come to the island to engage in construction work necessary for the buildup.
Bordallo said among concerns associated with the buildup is "the lack of a comprehensive plan for the housing of guest workers and providing for their health care needs in a manner that does not further overwhelm our local infrastructure and health care system."
"We cannot allow guest worker housing off-base to cause the faucets to run dry or power outages in our homes," she said, adding she will not support "appropriations and authorizations that will result in a construction pace that brings 80,000 people to Guam in 2014."
Bordallo's call for the buildup plan to be delayed follows a similar request by Guam Gov. Felix Camacho to the U.S. military last month.
The relocation of the Marines from Okinawa to Guam is linked to the planned relocation of the U.S. Marine Corps' Futemma Air Station within Okinawa, which is also eyed in the same time frame.
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement EIS/OE
Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement EIS/OE
Joint Guam Program Office (JGPO)
C/O NAVFAC Pacific
258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-3134
Attention: GPMO
Reference: Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS), Guam and CNMI Military Relocation:
Relocating Marines from Okinawa, Visiting Aircraft Carrier Berthing, and Army Air and Missile Defense Task Force
Hafa Adai! Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the referenced Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The military buildup proposed for the island of Guahan unprecedented in sheer size and magnitude that it will undoubtedly significantly impact and change the culture, environment, quality of life, and future of the island. Guahan's ability to effectively integrate the military expansion will determine the success of the island's growth and development for decades to come.
This cover letter summarizes our technical and policy concerns about the DEIS, and are detailed in the attached comment spreadsheets prepared by the staff and technical experts of the Government of Guahan instrumentalities. We are submitting these comments as the "affected official local government" in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A). Please enter this letter and all the attachments submitted with it into the comment record.
Our purpose in submitting detailed comments is to ensure that the Department of Defense (DOD) has a full understanding of Guahan's concerns about the proposed military buildup and the DEIS. We believe that the DEIS is lacking in a number of areas.
Click here to view this posting in it's entirety. (pdf format - file size 44mb)
http://guamgovernor.net/GOV%20FINAL%20COMPILATION.pdf
Joint Guam Program Office (JGPO)
C/O NAVFAC Pacific
258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-3134
Attention: GPMO
Reference: Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS), Guam and CNMI Military Relocation:
Relocating Marines from Okinawa, Visiting Aircraft Carrier Berthing, and Army Air and Missile Defense Task Force
Hafa Adai! Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the referenced Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The military buildup proposed for the island of Guahan unprecedented in sheer size and magnitude that it will undoubtedly significantly impact and change the culture, environment, quality of life, and future of the island. Guahan's ability to effectively integrate the military expansion will determine the success of the island's growth and development for decades to come.
This cover letter summarizes our technical and policy concerns about the DEIS, and are detailed in the attached comment spreadsheets prepared by the staff and technical experts of the Government of Guahan instrumentalities. We are submitting these comments as the "affected official local government" in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A). Please enter this letter and all the attachments submitted with it into the comment record.
Our purpose in submitting detailed comments is to ensure that the Department of Defense (DOD) has a full understanding of Guahan's concerns about the proposed military buildup and the DEIS. We believe that the DEIS is lacking in a number of areas.
Click here to view this posting in it's entirety. (pdf format - file size 44mb)
http://guamgovernor.net/GOV%20FINAL%20COMPILATION.pdf
Sen. Webb open to options on Okinawa base dispute
Sen. Webb open to options on Okinawa base dispute
By Malcolm Foster, The Associated Press
Pacific edition, Wednesday, February 17, 2010
TOKYO — A member of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee said Monday he's open to hearing options on how to resolve a dispute over the relocation of a controversial U.S. Marine base on the Japanese island of Okinawa.
Starting a weeklong tour in Japan and Guam, Sen. Jim Webb also called Toyota's recent recall problems — the subject of two congressional hearings next week — a "business issue" that wouldn't affect political ties between Japan and the United States.
U.S.-Japan relations have soured after the new Tokyo government put on hold a plan to move Futenma Marine airfield on the southern island of Okinawa — part of a broader 2006 agreement with Washington to reorganize the 47,000 U.S. troops in Japan — because of local opposition.
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, who swept into power after last August's elections, has said he will make a decision on Futenma by May.
Webb, who has made numerous visits to Okinawa over the last 40 years, first as a Marine during the Vietnam War and later as a U.S. defense planner and government official, said the main purpose of his visit was to listen to the views of the Japanese government and people of Okinawa, where many resent the heavy U.S. military presence.
"There could be a number of practical options," Webb said about ways to resolve the Futenma issue. "I don't want to outline those options today because I don't want to cut short the discussions that we're going to have."
Webb, a Democrat who represents Virginia, said a solution needed to be found quickly "on the Futenma issue for the well-being of the citizens in that area."
"I am open to listening to all suggestions from the Japanese government and also the people of Okinawa," he told journalists at a news conference.
Last year, Webb made a high-profile trip to Myanmar to negotiate the release of American John Yettaw, who was arrested and sentenced to seven years in prison after he had sneaked into the home of pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
The Obama administration has insisted the Hatoyama government proceed with the 2006 plan to move Futenma to Nago, a city in a less crowded, northern part of Okinawa that recently elected an anti-base mayor.
Webb said he did not recommend moving Futema's facilities outside of Okinawa, as many local residents want, but he also suggested he didn't necessarily support the Obama's administration's position.
"We're not a parliamentary system, so I am not obligated to support the administration in a specific way," he said.
Webb, who is also chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on East Asia, met with Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada later Monday.
Making his first trip to Japan since Hatoyama came to office in September, Webb said he didn't believe that U.S.-Japan ties had been weakened by the change in government in Tokyo, and stressed that Japan was Washington's most important ally in the region.
He also defended the U.S. military presence in Japan and the importance of having Marines based in Okinawa.
"I would ask you to consider what the stability of this region would look like if suddenly (the U.S.) were to withdraw its military from its bases in Japan, what temptations might follow that," he said.
Webb briefly touched on Japanese family law that gives only one parent — nearly always the mother — custody of children in cases of divorce. That has left many divorced American fathers from seeing their children in Japan.
The issue has become increasingly important in Washington. Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell last month warned that if Japan doesn't address the problem it risks hurting ties with the U.S.
Webb said he hoped Japan's Ministry of Justice would work to arrange "proper custody arrangements" and that it could "be resolved through harmony between the two governments rather than bringing a big stick."
By Malcolm Foster, The Associated Press
Pacific edition, Wednesday, February 17, 2010
TOKYO — A member of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee said Monday he's open to hearing options on how to resolve a dispute over the relocation of a controversial U.S. Marine base on the Japanese island of Okinawa.
Starting a weeklong tour in Japan and Guam, Sen. Jim Webb also called Toyota's recent recall problems — the subject of two congressional hearings next week — a "business issue" that wouldn't affect political ties between Japan and the United States.
U.S.-Japan relations have soured after the new Tokyo government put on hold a plan to move Futenma Marine airfield on the southern island of Okinawa — part of a broader 2006 agreement with Washington to reorganize the 47,000 U.S. troops in Japan — because of local opposition.
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, who swept into power after last August's elections, has said he will make a decision on Futenma by May.
Webb, who has made numerous visits to Okinawa over the last 40 years, first as a Marine during the Vietnam War and later as a U.S. defense planner and government official, said the main purpose of his visit was to listen to the views of the Japanese government and people of Okinawa, where many resent the heavy U.S. military presence.
"There could be a number of practical options," Webb said about ways to resolve the Futenma issue. "I don't want to outline those options today because I don't want to cut short the discussions that we're going to have."
Webb, a Democrat who represents Virginia, said a solution needed to be found quickly "on the Futenma issue for the well-being of the citizens in that area."
"I am open to listening to all suggestions from the Japanese government and also the people of Okinawa," he told journalists at a news conference.
Last year, Webb made a high-profile trip to Myanmar to negotiate the release of American John Yettaw, who was arrested and sentenced to seven years in prison after he had sneaked into the home of pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
The Obama administration has insisted the Hatoyama government proceed with the 2006 plan to move Futenma to Nago, a city in a less crowded, northern part of Okinawa that recently elected an anti-base mayor.
Webb said he did not recommend moving Futema's facilities outside of Okinawa, as many local residents want, but he also suggested he didn't necessarily support the Obama's administration's position.
"We're not a parliamentary system, so I am not obligated to support the administration in a specific way," he said.
Webb, who is also chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on East Asia, met with Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada later Monday.
Making his first trip to Japan since Hatoyama came to office in September, Webb said he didn't believe that U.S.-Japan ties had been weakened by the change in government in Tokyo, and stressed that Japan was Washington's most important ally in the region.
He also defended the U.S. military presence in Japan and the importance of having Marines based in Okinawa.
"I would ask you to consider what the stability of this region would look like if suddenly (the U.S.) were to withdraw its military from its bases in Japan, what temptations might follow that," he said.
Webb briefly touched on Japanese family law that gives only one parent — nearly always the mother — custody of children in cases of divorce. That has left many divorced American fathers from seeing their children in Japan.
The issue has become increasingly important in Washington. Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell last month warned that if Japan doesn't address the problem it risks hurting ties with the U.S.
Webb said he hoped Japan's Ministry of Justice would work to arrange "proper custody arrangements" and that it could "be resolved through harmony between the two governments rather than bringing a big stick."
Merging bases turns out to be not so simple and not so cost effective
Merging bases turns out to be not so simple and not so cost effective
By Charlie Reed, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition, Wednesday, February 17, 2010
YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan — The idea behind a 2005 plan to streamline the military is seemingly simple: Merge Army Post X with nearby Naval Base Y and let the savings begin.
But combining 26 neighboring Army, Navy and Air Force installations — located in the continental United States and the Pacific — into 11 joint bases and one joint region is proving far from simple and even farther from reducing costs.
Military estimates of potential savings over the next 20 years already have dropped significantly since 2005, from $2.3 billion to $273 million, according to a 2009 Government Accountability Office report.
Four joint bases and Joint Region Marianas became operational in October and the other seven follow suit this year.
The joint basing plan focuses on consolidating base support services — such as building maintenance, gate security and child care — to increase purchasing power and reduce potential overlaps in the work force.
The problem, according to the GAO, is that the Pentagon raised standards for joint bases that require them to fully fund support services — a practice rarely accomplished at traditional bases as the military attempts to reduce non-war spending.
Most commanders can keep costs down at their bases with measures such as reducing gym hours or postponing building renovations. But commanders of joint bases have no such flexibility.
The higher standards and the funding mandate “put a limit on how much you can save at joint bases,” said Navy Capt. Richard Kitchens, who is leading efforts at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, where a gate that for decades separated Naval Station Pearl Harbor and Hickam Air Force Base was removed Jan. 31 in anticipation of their official merge in October.
And along with higher-than-expected administrative costs — at least in the short term — and the loss of efficiencies some merging bases will experience by no longer being part of their services’ regional operations, it is “unclear whether joint basing will result in any actual savings,” the GAO report states.
Meanwhile, military leaders at the joint bases have put reducing costs on the back burner as they continue sorting out how to combine manpower and adapt to each other’s distinct military cultures and business practices.
“We’re still making sure we’re not going to impact the mission,” Kitchens said. “We’re going to do this right and then worry about the savings.”
The joint bases are expected to save money by joining forces for contracted goods and services and ultimately eliminating duplicate jobs, though the Pentagon has stopped short of mandating they do so for now.
“We’re reasonably a couple of years away from achieving savings, if there are any to be achieved,” said Steve Wolborsky, chief of Andersen Air Force Base’s development office on Guam.
Andersen and Naval Base Guam are the only two installations that combined to form a joint region rather than a joint base. One service at each of the other joint bases takes ownership of the installation, while Navy and Air Force commanders on Guam retain responsibility for their respective bases but are now considered Joint Region Marianas.
The base mergers are part of the 2005 Base Closure and Realignment Act, or BRAC — sweeping legislation intended to make the military more efficient.
The collective BRAC measures also are expected to save less than had been planned in 2005, dropping from $36 billion to $13.7 billion, the GAO reported in an earlier 2009 report.
By Charlie Reed, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition, Wednesday, February 17, 2010
YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan — The idea behind a 2005 plan to streamline the military is seemingly simple: Merge Army Post X with nearby Naval Base Y and let the savings begin.
But combining 26 neighboring Army, Navy and Air Force installations — located in the continental United States and the Pacific — into 11 joint bases and one joint region is proving far from simple and even farther from reducing costs.
Military estimates of potential savings over the next 20 years already have dropped significantly since 2005, from $2.3 billion to $273 million, according to a 2009 Government Accountability Office report.
Four joint bases and Joint Region Marianas became operational in October and the other seven follow suit this year.
The joint basing plan focuses on consolidating base support services — such as building maintenance, gate security and child care — to increase purchasing power and reduce potential overlaps in the work force.
The problem, according to the GAO, is that the Pentagon raised standards for joint bases that require them to fully fund support services — a practice rarely accomplished at traditional bases as the military attempts to reduce non-war spending.
Most commanders can keep costs down at their bases with measures such as reducing gym hours or postponing building renovations. But commanders of joint bases have no such flexibility.
The higher standards and the funding mandate “put a limit on how much you can save at joint bases,” said Navy Capt. Richard Kitchens, who is leading efforts at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, where a gate that for decades separated Naval Station Pearl Harbor and Hickam Air Force Base was removed Jan. 31 in anticipation of their official merge in October.
And along with higher-than-expected administrative costs — at least in the short term — and the loss of efficiencies some merging bases will experience by no longer being part of their services’ regional operations, it is “unclear whether joint basing will result in any actual savings,” the GAO report states.
Meanwhile, military leaders at the joint bases have put reducing costs on the back burner as they continue sorting out how to combine manpower and adapt to each other’s distinct military cultures and business practices.
“We’re still making sure we’re not going to impact the mission,” Kitchens said. “We’re going to do this right and then worry about the savings.”
The joint bases are expected to save money by joining forces for contracted goods and services and ultimately eliminating duplicate jobs, though the Pentagon has stopped short of mandating they do so for now.
“We’re reasonably a couple of years away from achieving savings, if there are any to be achieved,” said Steve Wolborsky, chief of Andersen Air Force Base’s development office on Guam.
Andersen and Naval Base Guam are the only two installations that combined to form a joint region rather than a joint base. One service at each of the other joint bases takes ownership of the installation, while Navy and Air Force commanders on Guam retain responsibility for their respective bases but are now considered Joint Region Marianas.
The base mergers are part of the 2005 Base Closure and Realignment Act, or BRAC — sweeping legislation intended to make the military more efficient.
The collective BRAC measures also are expected to save less than had been planned in 2005, dropping from $36 billion to $13.7 billion, the GAO reported in an earlier 2009 report.
Relocation of US troops to NMI not done deal
Relocation of US troops to NMI not done deal
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
By Haidee V. Eugenio
Reporter
Kitazawa Japan's Defense Minister Toshimi Kitazawa on Friday downplayed the idea of relocating up to 4,000 U.S. troops from the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma in Okinawa to Tinian, even as Gov. Benigno R. Fitial and the CNMI Military Integration Management Committee said yesterday that the Commonwealth welcomes such relocation consideration “only if such plan is supported and approved by the U.S. federal government and the Department of Defense.”
Tinian is one of the major islands in the U.S. territory of the CNMI.
“We are by no means trying to entice the Japanese government to push for the relocation of a base in the CNMI as this is solely a decision that will be made by the U.S. government. The administration and the MIMC will respect and support any such decisions that are made,” the Fitial administration said in a statement when asked for comment on the Futenma relocation issue.
Press Secretary Angel Demapan said Fitial and the MIMC will be open to any dialogue that the U.S. Department of Defense may want to engage in.
“However, any such dialogue would have to be at the request of the federal government,” he said.
International media quoted Japan's Kitazawa as saying that Futenma's relocation to the CNMI could be considered as a “long-term issue.”
He said, however, the views of the U.S. military on the relocation issue are important and that discussions are expected to take place on whether the necessary deterrence can be maintained in the Asia-Pacific region if all the Marine functions in Okinawa are transferred to Tinian.
Two-thirds of Tinian's land is leased to the U.S. military.
Three Japanese lawmakers who visited Saipan briefly on Feb. 10 told CNMI officials that they are considering the CNMI as one of relocation sites for 2,000 to 4,000 U.S. troops at Futenma.
In interviews with international media, Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi Hirano, who leads a government task force on the matter, also expressed little enthusiasm for the idea of relocating Futenma to Tinian. He said the task force has never discussed it before.
Japan had said it will reach a final conclusion by the end of May on where it wants to see the Futenma facility relocated, and a government committee has been exploring possible candidate sites, while Washington, D.C. maintains that a plan agreed upon by Japan and the United States in 2006 to move the Futenma base to a less densely populated part of Okinawa is the best option.
The three Japanese lawmakers who visited Saipan last week-Mikio Shimoji, Tomoko Abe, and Ryoichi Hattori-met with Fitial, Lt. Gov. Eloy S. Inos, House Speaker Froilan C. Tenorio (Cov-Saipan), and Senate President Paul A. Manglona (R-Saipan).
The three lawmakers were part of a 23-member Japanese government delegation who arrived in Guam for a “fact-finding” visit, particularly to see if there's suitable place on Guam for more U.S. troops to be relocated off Okinawa.
The up to 4,000 considered to be relocated to Tinian is in addition to the estimated 8,000 Marines and their 9,000 dependents who are expected to be relocated by 2014, although Guam Gov. Felix P. Camacho asked for the military buildup to be delayed until after 2014.
Fitial and other CNMI officials last week said they welcome the relocation of U.S. troops to the Commonwealth provided the U.S. government consents to such move. This statement was repeated yesterday by the administration and the MIMC.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
By Haidee V. Eugenio
Reporter
Kitazawa Japan's Defense Minister Toshimi Kitazawa on Friday downplayed the idea of relocating up to 4,000 U.S. troops from the Marine Corps Air Station Futenma in Okinawa to Tinian, even as Gov. Benigno R. Fitial and the CNMI Military Integration Management Committee said yesterday that the Commonwealth welcomes such relocation consideration “only if such plan is supported and approved by the U.S. federal government and the Department of Defense.”
Tinian is one of the major islands in the U.S. territory of the CNMI.
“We are by no means trying to entice the Japanese government to push for the relocation of a base in the CNMI as this is solely a decision that will be made by the U.S. government. The administration and the MIMC will respect and support any such decisions that are made,” the Fitial administration said in a statement when asked for comment on the Futenma relocation issue.
Press Secretary Angel Demapan said Fitial and the MIMC will be open to any dialogue that the U.S. Department of Defense may want to engage in.
“However, any such dialogue would have to be at the request of the federal government,” he said.
International media quoted Japan's Kitazawa as saying that Futenma's relocation to the CNMI could be considered as a “long-term issue.”
He said, however, the views of the U.S. military on the relocation issue are important and that discussions are expected to take place on whether the necessary deterrence can be maintained in the Asia-Pacific region if all the Marine functions in Okinawa are transferred to Tinian.
Two-thirds of Tinian's land is leased to the U.S. military.
Three Japanese lawmakers who visited Saipan briefly on Feb. 10 told CNMI officials that they are considering the CNMI as one of relocation sites for 2,000 to 4,000 U.S. troops at Futenma.
In interviews with international media, Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi Hirano, who leads a government task force on the matter, also expressed little enthusiasm for the idea of relocating Futenma to Tinian. He said the task force has never discussed it before.
Japan had said it will reach a final conclusion by the end of May on where it wants to see the Futenma facility relocated, and a government committee has been exploring possible candidate sites, while Washington, D.C. maintains that a plan agreed upon by Japan and the United States in 2006 to move the Futenma base to a less densely populated part of Okinawa is the best option.
The three Japanese lawmakers who visited Saipan last week-Mikio Shimoji, Tomoko Abe, and Ryoichi Hattori-met with Fitial, Lt. Gov. Eloy S. Inos, House Speaker Froilan C. Tenorio (Cov-Saipan), and Senate President Paul A. Manglona (R-Saipan).
The three lawmakers were part of a 23-member Japanese government delegation who arrived in Guam for a “fact-finding” visit, particularly to see if there's suitable place on Guam for more U.S. troops to be relocated off Okinawa.
The up to 4,000 considered to be relocated to Tinian is in addition to the estimated 8,000 Marines and their 9,000 dependents who are expected to be relocated by 2014, although Guam Gov. Felix P. Camacho asked for the military buildup to be delayed until after 2014.
Fitial and other CNMI officials last week said they welcome the relocation of U.S. troops to the Commonwealth provided the U.S. government consents to such move. This statement was repeated yesterday by the administration and the MIMC.
Bordallo challenges DEIS
Bordallo challenges DEIS
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:37
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
Congressional report lists flaws of the draft study
THE military buildup must be delayed, Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo said last night, acknowledging that the draft environmental impact statement has serious deficiencies that need to be addressed.
In her congressional report to the people, Bordallo identified six areas of concern regarding the draft study, including and the Navy’s desire to acquire additional private and public lands.
“We will challenge the Navy to conduct the military buildup on their existing land. The Navy should better utilize its land and consider moving housing and some support facilities for the Marine aviation unit to Andersen Air Force Base,” Bordallo said.
Secondly, an area of concern is the proposed firing range at Pagat and Sasayan. “If private property owners choose not to lease or sell their land I will support them and oppose any effort by the Department of Defense to use eminent domain to acquire that land. I recognize the input of private landowners and the organization ‘We Are Guahan’ on this issue.
A third area of concern is the proposed alternative for an aircraft carrier transient berth in Apra Harbor. “The plans for the carrier berth in Apra Harbor will result in a significant loss of coral. I will challenge the Navy to identify other alternatives that will minimize coral damage and that will take advantage of currently dredged areas such as Kilo or Delta wharves among others. I thank Senator Guthertz for her input,” said the congresswoman.
Fourth, she noted the need for federal assistance for improving civilian infrastructure on Guam to support the military buildup.
“While the DEIS draft report recognizes the need to improve civilian infrastructure it does not provide a clear strategy that details how the federal government will assist Guam,” Bordallo said as she opposed the Navy’s plan to drill 22 new wells in the north “until an independent assessment is made about the capacity of the northern aquifer.”
The fifth area of concern is the lack of a comprehensive plan for the housing of guest workers and providing for their health care needs in a manner that does not further overwhelm Guam’s local infrastructure and health care system.
“Let me be clear about this issue – we must do all that we can to train our local workforce and hire them before we utilize guest workers. Any proposal to house guest workers outside the gates must address their impact on civilian infrastructure such as water, wastewater and power. We cannot allow guest worker housing off-base to cause the faucets to run dry or power outages in our homes.”
Socioeconomic
Finally, Bordallo said, the socioeconomic portion of the draft study must be completely rewritten “in order to truly address the socioeconomic impacts of the military buildup.”
She said she will encourage the Navy to work closely with the University of Guam, the Guam Community College and the Department of Chamorro Affairs to develop a better understanding of the cultural issues and to formulate a comprehensive plan to support programs which preserve and promote Chamorro culture and language and I thank Fuetsan Famaloan for this input.”
On the issue of war claims, Bordallo said that she has made significant progress and that “we are closer than ever to passing this bill and we will continue to build on our progress.”
Bordallo spoke strongly on Guam’s quest for self-determination saying that Guam must refocus on the process to achieve decolonization and improve its political status with the U.S.
Projects
Bordallo also said she was concerned about the one of the assumption in the draft impact report that all projects will be completed by 2014.
“It would not be an exaggeration to say that this draft EIS has done more harm than good. The DEIS has not accurately identified the impacts on Guam and it has exaggerated some impacts based on a false assumption that all projects will be completed by 2014,” said the congresswoman.
“This flawed assumption has drawn consequences and conclusions that are not sustainable and not supported by anyone. Nobody wants 80,000 additional people on Guam in 2014,” Bordallo said. “We will do everything that we can, federally and locally, to stop that from happening. As I said before, we have our foot on the brakes. I will not support appropriations and authorizations that will result in a construction pace that brings 80,000 people to Guam in 2014.”
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:37
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
Congressional report lists flaws of the draft study
THE military buildup must be delayed, Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo said last night, acknowledging that the draft environmental impact statement has serious deficiencies that need to be addressed.
In her congressional report to the people, Bordallo identified six areas of concern regarding the draft study, including and the Navy’s desire to acquire additional private and public lands.
“We will challenge the Navy to conduct the military buildup on their existing land. The Navy should better utilize its land and consider moving housing and some support facilities for the Marine aviation unit to Andersen Air Force Base,” Bordallo said.
Secondly, an area of concern is the proposed firing range at Pagat and Sasayan. “If private property owners choose not to lease or sell their land I will support them and oppose any effort by the Department of Defense to use eminent domain to acquire that land. I recognize the input of private landowners and the organization ‘We Are Guahan’ on this issue.
A third area of concern is the proposed alternative for an aircraft carrier transient berth in Apra Harbor. “The plans for the carrier berth in Apra Harbor will result in a significant loss of coral. I will challenge the Navy to identify other alternatives that will minimize coral damage and that will take advantage of currently dredged areas such as Kilo or Delta wharves among others. I thank Senator Guthertz for her input,” said the congresswoman.
Fourth, she noted the need for federal assistance for improving civilian infrastructure on Guam to support the military buildup.
“While the DEIS draft report recognizes the need to improve civilian infrastructure it does not provide a clear strategy that details how the federal government will assist Guam,” Bordallo said as she opposed the Navy’s plan to drill 22 new wells in the north “until an independent assessment is made about the capacity of the northern aquifer.”
The fifth area of concern is the lack of a comprehensive plan for the housing of guest workers and providing for their health care needs in a manner that does not further overwhelm Guam’s local infrastructure and health care system.
“Let me be clear about this issue – we must do all that we can to train our local workforce and hire them before we utilize guest workers. Any proposal to house guest workers outside the gates must address their impact on civilian infrastructure such as water, wastewater and power. We cannot allow guest worker housing off-base to cause the faucets to run dry or power outages in our homes.”
Socioeconomic
Finally, Bordallo said, the socioeconomic portion of the draft study must be completely rewritten “in order to truly address the socioeconomic impacts of the military buildup.”
She said she will encourage the Navy to work closely with the University of Guam, the Guam Community College and the Department of Chamorro Affairs to develop a better understanding of the cultural issues and to formulate a comprehensive plan to support programs which preserve and promote Chamorro culture and language and I thank Fuetsan Famaloan for this input.”
On the issue of war claims, Bordallo said that she has made significant progress and that “we are closer than ever to passing this bill and we will continue to build on our progress.”
Bordallo spoke strongly on Guam’s quest for self-determination saying that Guam must refocus on the process to achieve decolonization and improve its political status with the U.S.
Projects
Bordallo also said she was concerned about the one of the assumption in the draft impact report that all projects will be completed by 2014.
“It would not be an exaggeration to say that this draft EIS has done more harm than good. The DEIS has not accurately identified the impacts on Guam and it has exaggerated some impacts based on a false assumption that all projects will be completed by 2014,” said the congresswoman.
“This flawed assumption has drawn consequences and conclusions that are not sustainable and not supported by anyone. Nobody wants 80,000 additional people on Guam in 2014,” Bordallo said. “We will do everything that we can, federally and locally, to stop that from happening. As I said before, we have our foot on the brakes. I will not support appropriations and authorizations that will result in a construction pace that brings 80,000 people to Guam in 2014.”
First DoD civilian convicted on Guam
First DoD civilian convicted on Guam
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:34
by Romeo Carlos | Variety News Staff
AHEAD of the military’s plan to heavily militarize Guam over the next few years and growing concerns by local residents over the social impact of thousands of Marines coming to Guam, U.S. Attorney Lenny Rapadas has announced the conviction of a military civilian employee brought to Guam to face charges of sexual abuse of a minor while employed at a military base on Okinawa.
Bruce Carey Wood, 56, was sentenced yesterday in the District Court of Guam by Judge Francis Tydingco-Gatewood to 10 years of prison time, becoming the first Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act case tried on Guam.
Wood had been living and working on Okinawa as a chef at the U.S. Camp Shield Naval Base, where he was arrested last July for sexual abuse of a boy since 2000, according to court documents.
On the first count of aggravated sexual abuse, sexual contact allegedly occurred between 2000 and 2004, when the boy was less than 12 years old, court documents state. He was charged with a second count of alleged sexual abuse of a minor between 2005 and 2008.
“This is proof that no one is beyond the law,” Rapadas said, adding that the long arm jurisdiction “allows us to reach out and prosecute U.S. citizens who commit crimes outside the United States.”
Closed loopholes
MEJA was a bill passed in 2000 to close legal loopholes that allowed civilians or military personnel to escape justice for crimes they might commit while employed by or accompanying armed forces overseas.
The law covers civilian employees of the Department of Defense as well as its contractors and their employees, including subcontractors who could face prosecution for any offense otherwise punishable by imprisonment for more than one year if committed within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
A series of incidents in Okinawa over the years has led to considerable public uproar over crimes linked to U.S. troops in Japan, including a long history of individual and gang rapes, robberies and murder by military personnel linked to the Okinawa bases.
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:34
by Romeo Carlos | Variety News Staff
AHEAD of the military’s plan to heavily militarize Guam over the next few years and growing concerns by local residents over the social impact of thousands of Marines coming to Guam, U.S. Attorney Lenny Rapadas has announced the conviction of a military civilian employee brought to Guam to face charges of sexual abuse of a minor while employed at a military base on Okinawa.
Bruce Carey Wood, 56, was sentenced yesterday in the District Court of Guam by Judge Francis Tydingco-Gatewood to 10 years of prison time, becoming the first Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act case tried on Guam.
Wood had been living and working on Okinawa as a chef at the U.S. Camp Shield Naval Base, where he was arrested last July for sexual abuse of a boy since 2000, according to court documents.
On the first count of aggravated sexual abuse, sexual contact allegedly occurred between 2000 and 2004, when the boy was less than 12 years old, court documents state. He was charged with a second count of alleged sexual abuse of a minor between 2005 and 2008.
“This is proof that no one is beyond the law,” Rapadas said, adding that the long arm jurisdiction “allows us to reach out and prosecute U.S. citizens who commit crimes outside the United States.”
Closed loopholes
MEJA was a bill passed in 2000 to close legal loopholes that allowed civilians or military personnel to escape justice for crimes they might commit while employed by or accompanying armed forces overseas.
The law covers civilian employees of the Department of Defense as well as its contractors and their employees, including subcontractors who could face prosecution for any offense otherwise punishable by imprisonment for more than one year if committed within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
A series of incidents in Okinawa over the years has led to considerable public uproar over crimes linked to U.S. troops in Japan, including a long history of individual and gang rapes, robberies and murder by military personnel linked to the Okinawa bases.
DEIS comment period expires tomorrow
DEIS comment period expires tomorrow
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:33
by Zita Y. Taitano | Variety News Staff
GUAM residents have until 3 p.m. tomorrow to submit their comments on the draft environmental impact statement, upon expiration of the 90-day public review and comment that officially started on Nov. 21 last year.
The Record of Decision is expected to be issued in August.
Senator Ben Pangelinan wants to see the final draft of the document to see if changes are made to include public input. “Then we would submit comments on the final draft for the final copy,” he said.
There were two ways for residents to submit their comments, whether it was to submit on line on the impact study’s website www.guambuildupeis.us or to do download the comment form the site and mail it to the Joint Guam Program Office courtesy of the Naval Facilities headquarters in Hawaii.
The latter of which must be postmarked on Feb. 17 in order for the comment document to be included with the thousands of other comments on the study.
The original time frame for the comment period was 45 days, but was extended to 90 days after concerns were raised that the allotted time was not enough for residents to fully digest the 11,000-page document and express their thoughts.
Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo has requested the Department of Navy to extend the comment period further, but the congresswoman received no response.
Senator Judi Guthertz, chairman of the military buildup committee at the legislature, yesterday sent another installment of comment paper, in which she emphasized the billions of dollars that Guam needs in order to adequately prepare itself for the military buildup.
“Only minimal assistance has been forthcoming from the federal government, which has placed this unfunded mandate upon 178,000 American citizens living on a tiny island of only 212 square miles,” said Guthertz.
Once all the comments have been received at the NAVFAC Pacific, they will be reviewed and put together for the final draft copy.
Residents who would like to send their comments via regular mail can send them to the following address JGPO c/o NAVFAC Pacific, 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3134 ATTENTION: GMPO. Again, all comments mailed out by Wednesday should have it postmarked Feb. 17.
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:33
by Zita Y. Taitano | Variety News Staff
GUAM residents have until 3 p.m. tomorrow to submit their comments on the draft environmental impact statement, upon expiration of the 90-day public review and comment that officially started on Nov. 21 last year.
The Record of Decision is expected to be issued in August.
Senator Ben Pangelinan wants to see the final draft of the document to see if changes are made to include public input. “Then we would submit comments on the final draft for the final copy,” he said.
There were two ways for residents to submit their comments, whether it was to submit on line on the impact study’s website www.guambuildupeis.us or to do download the comment form the site and mail it to the Joint Guam Program Office courtesy of the Naval Facilities headquarters in Hawaii.
The latter of which must be postmarked on Feb. 17 in order for the comment document to be included with the thousands of other comments on the study.
The original time frame for the comment period was 45 days, but was extended to 90 days after concerns were raised that the allotted time was not enough for residents to fully digest the 11,000-page document and express their thoughts.
Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo has requested the Department of Navy to extend the comment period further, but the congresswoman received no response.
Senator Judi Guthertz, chairman of the military buildup committee at the legislature, yesterday sent another installment of comment paper, in which she emphasized the billions of dollars that Guam needs in order to adequately prepare itself for the military buildup.
“Only minimal assistance has been forthcoming from the federal government, which has placed this unfunded mandate upon 178,000 American citizens living on a tiny island of only 212 square miles,” said Guthertz.
Once all the comments have been received at the NAVFAC Pacific, they will be reviewed and put together for the final draft copy.
Residents who would like to send their comments via regular mail can send them to the following address JGPO c/o NAVFAC Pacific, 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3134 ATTENTION: GMPO. Again, all comments mailed out by Wednesday should have it postmarked Feb. 17.
Historian backs ‘Guahan,’ senator bats for self-rule
Historian backs ‘Guahan,’ senator bats for self-rule
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:32
by Tiffany Sukola | Variety News Staff
A LOCAL historian stands behind Gov. Felix Camacho’s initiative to adopt “Guahan” as the island’s official name, despite harsh criticism from some local residents.
Camacho signed an executive order on Monday after delivering his final state of the island address that calls for all “Guam” references in official documents to be replaced with “Guahan,” the island’s indigenous name. The governor also asked legislators to enact a similar measure to adopt the name-change as well.
University of Guam Chamorro professor Peter Onedera said critics of the governor’s initiative are missing the point of this unprecedented move. He said he has heard opponents of Camacho’s decision say that the name-change will have no effect on the Chamorro people.
However, Onedera said he fully supports Camacho’s move because he sees this is a chance for the Chamorro people to finally have a say in what happens to their island. “This is a step in the right direction,” said Onedera. “It’s about time the Chamorro people are empowered.”
Onedera said local residents should not let this opportunity to give the island its proper name back. “Other names were given through time, from the Spanish, the Japanese and the Americans,” he said. “But no one ever asked the native people if it was ok or got permission from them to use these new names.”
According to Onedera, “Guahan” and “Guam” have both been used in historical documents referencing the island. However, the natives called their island “Guahan.”
Americans started calling the island, ‘Guam’, when they arrived in 1898, said Onedera. The name stuck after the island was referenced as “Guam” in the Treaty of Paris.
The first naval governor, Richard Leary, requested that the island be officially named, “Isle of Guam.”
Onedera added that residents should feel empowered because they finally have a chance to voice their opinion on the matter.
However, Sen. Judi Guthertz said that while Camacho’s intentions are all well and good, changing the name of our island is not a legacy.
“A legacy is achieving something really remarkable on a significant issue,” said Guthertz in a press release yesterday. “I would suggest that the Governor concentrate…on establishing a new and improved political status as his legacy.”
Guthertz added that Camacho should convene the Commission on Decolonization and the Guam First Commission to address the issue of political status.
Onedera also said that he would like to see the next administration take a more proactive role in preserving the island’s culture and language.
“We are losing things of value to our culture,” said Onedera. “I hope the next administration has more cultural sensitivity.”
Onedera said he believes the Chamorro language is not used nearly enough throughout the island. The Chamorro language, he said, should be used more in official documents and during public speeches.
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:32
by Tiffany Sukola | Variety News Staff
A LOCAL historian stands behind Gov. Felix Camacho’s initiative to adopt “Guahan” as the island’s official name, despite harsh criticism from some local residents.
Camacho signed an executive order on Monday after delivering his final state of the island address that calls for all “Guam” references in official documents to be replaced with “Guahan,” the island’s indigenous name. The governor also asked legislators to enact a similar measure to adopt the name-change as well.
University of Guam Chamorro professor Peter Onedera said critics of the governor’s initiative are missing the point of this unprecedented move. He said he has heard opponents of Camacho’s decision say that the name-change will have no effect on the Chamorro people.
However, Onedera said he fully supports Camacho’s move because he sees this is a chance for the Chamorro people to finally have a say in what happens to their island. “This is a step in the right direction,” said Onedera. “It’s about time the Chamorro people are empowered.”
Onedera said local residents should not let this opportunity to give the island its proper name back. “Other names were given through time, from the Spanish, the Japanese and the Americans,” he said. “But no one ever asked the native people if it was ok or got permission from them to use these new names.”
According to Onedera, “Guahan” and “Guam” have both been used in historical documents referencing the island. However, the natives called their island “Guahan.”
Americans started calling the island, ‘Guam’, when they arrived in 1898, said Onedera. The name stuck after the island was referenced as “Guam” in the Treaty of Paris.
The first naval governor, Richard Leary, requested that the island be officially named, “Isle of Guam.”
Onedera added that residents should feel empowered because they finally have a chance to voice their opinion on the matter.
However, Sen. Judi Guthertz said that while Camacho’s intentions are all well and good, changing the name of our island is not a legacy.
“A legacy is achieving something really remarkable on a significant issue,” said Guthertz in a press release yesterday. “I would suggest that the Governor concentrate…on establishing a new and improved political status as his legacy.”
Guthertz added that Camacho should convene the Commission on Decolonization and the Guam First Commission to address the issue of political status.
Onedera also said that he would like to see the next administration take a more proactive role in preserving the island’s culture and language.
“We are losing things of value to our culture,” said Onedera. “I hope the next administration has more cultural sensitivity.”
Onedera said he believes the Chamorro language is not used nearly enough throughout the island. The Chamorro language, he said, should be used more in official documents and during public speeches.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Tinian option appeals to Japanese panel
Tinian option appeals to Japanese panel
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:30
by Mar-Vic Cagurangan | Variety News Staff
AFTER getting a clear sense that Guam already has too much on its plate, the Japanese delegation led by Diet member Mikio Shimijo has determined that Tinian would be a possible site for the relocation of some troops from Okinawa, according to a report by Starts and Stripes.
“It was very encouraging,” Shimoji said in a telephone interview with Stars and Stripes upon his return to Tokyo on Thursday last. “While Okinawa will continue to host military bases, risk-sharing is important.”
Members of the Diet, who toured military bases on island and met with Guam and CNMI officials, were presented a resolution passed by the Guam legislature seeking a reevaluation of the current plan for the massive military buildup on Guam.
Shimoji said the panel will relay the resolution to Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, along with Guam Gov. Felix Camacho’s statement that Guam could not handle any more than the 8,000 Marines already scheduled to transfer to the island, Stars and Stripes reported.
Shimoji said he pledged to be a voice for Guam in the Japanese Diet, the article stated.
“Besides the Marines and their families from Okinawa, Guam is expected to accept thousands more,” he said, indicating the island’s population will bulge with construction workers and other personnel to support the buildup. “Under those circumstances, it is not appropriate to add further troops to Guam.”
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:30
by Mar-Vic Cagurangan | Variety News Staff
AFTER getting a clear sense that Guam already has too much on its plate, the Japanese delegation led by Diet member Mikio Shimijo has determined that Tinian would be a possible site for the relocation of some troops from Okinawa, according to a report by Starts and Stripes.
“It was very encouraging,” Shimoji said in a telephone interview with Stars and Stripes upon his return to Tokyo on Thursday last. “While Okinawa will continue to host military bases, risk-sharing is important.”
Members of the Diet, who toured military bases on island and met with Guam and CNMI officials, were presented a resolution passed by the Guam legislature seeking a reevaluation of the current plan for the massive military buildup on Guam.
Shimoji said the panel will relay the resolution to Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, along with Guam Gov. Felix Camacho’s statement that Guam could not handle any more than the 8,000 Marines already scheduled to transfer to the island, Stars and Stripes reported.
Shimoji said he pledged to be a voice for Guam in the Japanese Diet, the article stated.
“Besides the Marines and their families from Okinawa, Guam is expected to accept thousands more,” he said, indicating the island’s population will bulge with construction workers and other personnel to support the buildup. “Under those circumstances, it is not appropriate to add further troops to Guam.”
Senators to meet with Webb
Senators to meet with Webb
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:29
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
SENATOR Jim Webb from Virginia, who is on a weeklong tour of Japan and Guam, will meet with Guam lawmakers on Thursday.
In Japan, Webb said he was open to hearing options on how to resolve the dispute over the relocation of the Futenma Marine air base in Okinawa.
The situation has become a contentious issue with the U.S. government and the new Japanese government, which has put a hold on plans to move Futenma air base on Nago, the southern island of Okinawa.
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama has said he will make a decision on Futenma by May.
Speaker Judi Won Pat said lawmakers will share with Webb their concerns regarding the draft environmental impact statement, as well as the U.S. not providing any funding to assist Guam in preparing for the military buildup which includes strengthening its infrastructure, the building of new schools to mitigate the already overcrowded facilities, the U.S. proposed firing range, the dredging of Apra Harbor, eminent domain, and the true overall sentiments of the people regarding the buildup.
Won Pat said with the recent fact-finding mission by a Japanese delegation to Guam, Japanese officials now have a clear picture of the reality of the buildup and the financial burden the government of Guam must carry. Won Pat said she was assured by Diet members that the information gathered will be carried back to Japan and told.
Won Pat said she hopes Webb will be open to lawmakers’ concerns and that he too will bring back these issues to his colleagues in Washington.
Webb has traveled to Okinawa in the last 40 years, first as a Marine during the Vietnam War and later as a U.S. defense planner and government official. He is a member of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee.
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:29
by Therese Hart | Variety News Staff
SENATOR Jim Webb from Virginia, who is on a weeklong tour of Japan and Guam, will meet with Guam lawmakers on Thursday.
In Japan, Webb said he was open to hearing options on how to resolve the dispute over the relocation of the Futenma Marine air base in Okinawa.
The situation has become a contentious issue with the U.S. government and the new Japanese government, which has put a hold on plans to move Futenma air base on Nago, the southern island of Okinawa.
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama has said he will make a decision on Futenma by May.
Speaker Judi Won Pat said lawmakers will share with Webb their concerns regarding the draft environmental impact statement, as well as the U.S. not providing any funding to assist Guam in preparing for the military buildup which includes strengthening its infrastructure, the building of new schools to mitigate the already overcrowded facilities, the U.S. proposed firing range, the dredging of Apra Harbor, eminent domain, and the true overall sentiments of the people regarding the buildup.
Won Pat said with the recent fact-finding mission by a Japanese delegation to Guam, Japanese officials now have a clear picture of the reality of the buildup and the financial burden the government of Guam must carry. Won Pat said she was assured by Diet members that the information gathered will be carried back to Japan and told.
Won Pat said she hopes Webb will be open to lawmakers’ concerns and that he too will bring back these issues to his colleagues in Washington.
Webb has traveled to Okinawa in the last 40 years, first as a Marine during the Vietnam War and later as a U.S. defense planner and government official. He is a member of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee.
Charity groups to assess Guam situation
Charity groups to assess Guam situation
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:23
Variety News Staff
(CSS) -- Catholic Social Services has invited Catholic Charities USA to Guam to learn about the community’s needs during the week of Feb. 22 to 26. This series of planning and information meetings is part of CSS ongoing efforts to plan for the future of Guam in the context of the unprecedented military buildup currently underway.
Catholic Charities is sending two senior representatives to Guam in order to learn about the issues facing Guam’s community arising from the military buildup and assist CSS in future planning and advocacy efforts with the federal government.
CSS and Catholic Charities representatives will work together to learn from island stakeholders, including island mayors, users of CSS services, Island clergy, and other Island leaders and supporters.
“For over 30 years, Catholic Social Services has done whatever it can to help those in need and those that fall between the gaps in our community,” executive director Cerila Rapadas.
“We serve all on our Island in need in the name of human dignity and respect. As we plan for our next 30 years, we must contend with the social impact of a huge influx of workers and their families from off-island. We’re very pleased and excited that Catholic Charities USA is stepping forward to help us meet this challenge,” she added.
Catholic Social Service is a non-profit organization serving persons with disabilities, the homeless, victims of family violence, persons needing emergency food and clothing, the poor, the elderly and disadvantaged families and individuals for the entire island of Guam.
Catholic Charities USA, headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, is the national office for over 1,700 local Catholic Charities agencies and institutions nationwide, including CSS on Guam.
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:23
Variety News Staff
(CSS) -- Catholic Social Services has invited Catholic Charities USA to Guam to learn about the community’s needs during the week of Feb. 22 to 26. This series of planning and information meetings is part of CSS ongoing efforts to plan for the future of Guam in the context of the unprecedented military buildup currently underway.
Catholic Charities is sending two senior representatives to Guam in order to learn about the issues facing Guam’s community arising from the military buildup and assist CSS in future planning and advocacy efforts with the federal government.
CSS and Catholic Charities representatives will work together to learn from island stakeholders, including island mayors, users of CSS services, Island clergy, and other Island leaders and supporters.
“For over 30 years, Catholic Social Services has done whatever it can to help those in need and those that fall between the gaps in our community,” executive director Cerila Rapadas.
“We serve all on our Island in need in the name of human dignity and respect. As we plan for our next 30 years, we must contend with the social impact of a huge influx of workers and their families from off-island. We’re very pleased and excited that Catholic Charities USA is stepping forward to help us meet this challenge,” she added.
Catholic Social Service is a non-profit organization serving persons with disabilities, the homeless, victims of family violence, persons needing emergency food and clothing, the poor, the elderly and disadvantaged families and individuals for the entire island of Guam.
Catholic Charities USA, headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, is the national office for over 1,700 local Catholic Charities agencies and institutions nationwide, including CSS on Guam.
Webb says relocation should go ahead as planned
Webb says relocation should go ahead as planned
2010/02/16 18:43(JST)
A visiting US senator says the relocation of the US Marine Corps Futenma Air Station in Okinawa should be implemented as planned as part of the US military realignment scheme.
Jim Webb, who chairs the East Asia and Pacific Affairs Subcommittee of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, on Tuesday met with Okinawa Governor Hirokazu Nakaima.
Webb expressed appreciation for the contribution Okinawa is making to the bilateral effort to maintain security.
Pointing out that the Futenma base is located in a densely populated area, Webb said the need now is to move it out of the present site to ensure resident safety.
He said he hopes that the US military realignment scheme be implemented as planned, including the relocation of the Futenma base to Nago City, also in Okinawa.
Nakaima responded to Webb by stating that Okinawa will wait for the government and governing parties to come up with an alternative site for the relocation by May.
2010/02/16 18:43(JST)
A visiting US senator says the relocation of the US Marine Corps Futenma Air Station in Okinawa should be implemented as planned as part of the US military realignment scheme.
Jim Webb, who chairs the East Asia and Pacific Affairs Subcommittee of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, on Tuesday met with Okinawa Governor Hirokazu Nakaima.
Webb expressed appreciation for the contribution Okinawa is making to the bilateral effort to maintain security.
Pointing out that the Futenma base is located in a densely populated area, Webb said the need now is to move it out of the present site to ensure resident safety.
He said he hopes that the US military realignment scheme be implemented as planned, including the relocation of the Futenma base to Nago City, also in Okinawa.
Nakaima responded to Webb by stating that Okinawa will wait for the government and governing parties to come up with an alternative site for the relocation by May.
PNC :: Congressional Report: Bordallo Details Her Objections To The Buildup
PNC :: Congressional Report: Bordallo Details Her Objections To The Buildup
Monday, 15 February 2010
Guam - Guam Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo detailed her objections to the military buildup in her annual Congressional Report before the Guam Legislature Tuesday night.
Speaking for just over a half hour, Bordallo reiterated her opposition to any attempt by the military to use eminent domain to gain access to additional island lands and she challenged DoD to complete the buildup within its current footprint.
The Congresswoman also raised objections to the Navy's plans to dredge acres of coral in Apra Harbor to make way for a new berth for a nuclear powered Aircraft carrier. Instead she suggested that there are alternatives like berthing any visiting carriers at Kilo Warf.
She also criticised the federal governmnet for not recognizing the severe strain the buildup will put on the island's civilian infrastructure and called on Washington to share the burden.
And Bordallo said she supports the Governor's efforts to delay the buildup to allow more time for the island to prepare for the impact.
Written by : Kevin Kerrigan
Monday, 15 February 2010
Guam - Guam Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo detailed her objections to the military buildup in her annual Congressional Report before the Guam Legislature Tuesday night.
Speaking for just over a half hour, Bordallo reiterated her opposition to any attempt by the military to use eminent domain to gain access to additional island lands and she challenged DoD to complete the buildup within its current footprint.
The Congresswoman also raised objections to the Navy's plans to dredge acres of coral in Apra Harbor to make way for a new berth for a nuclear powered Aircraft carrier. Instead she suggested that there are alternatives like berthing any visiting carriers at Kilo Warf.
She also criticised the federal governmnet for not recognizing the severe strain the buildup will put on the island's civilian infrastructure and called on Washington to share the burden.
And Bordallo said she supports the Governor's efforts to delay the buildup to allow more time for the island to prepare for the impact.
Written by : Kevin Kerrigan
PNC :: Senator Webb to Meet with Senators
PNC :: Senator Webb to Meet with Senators
Monday, 15 February 2010
Guam - Senator Webb will meet with local lawmakers Thursday morning at 11am.
Speaker Judi Wonpat sent a request to the senator who is coming to Guam from Japan. Webb is visiting this region mostly because of the U.S./Japan defense realignment agreement that will bring 8,000 marines and their dependents to Guam from Okinawa. Speaker Judi Wonpat says she hopes that Webb will have enough time to listen to all of the senators' concerns.
The speaker says it is important to meet with U.S. Senators about Guam's financial needs as a result of the military buildup because they are the ones who hold the purse strings.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
Monday, 15 February 2010
Guam - Senator Webb will meet with local lawmakers Thursday morning at 11am.
Speaker Judi Wonpat sent a request to the senator who is coming to Guam from Japan. Webb is visiting this region mostly because of the U.S./Japan defense realignment agreement that will bring 8,000 marines and their dependents to Guam from Okinawa. Speaker Judi Wonpat says she hopes that Webb will have enough time to listen to all of the senators' concerns.
The speaker says it is important to meet with U.S. Senators about Guam's financial needs as a result of the military buildup because they are the ones who hold the purse strings.
Written by : Clynt Ridgell
PNC :: Governor Issues Executive Order Changing Island Name To Guahan
PNC :: Governor Issues Executive Order Changing Island Name To Guahan
Monday, 15 February 2010
Guam - As promised in his State of the Island Address, Governor Felix Camacho wasted little time issuing an executive order to change the official name of Guam to Guahan.
His Executive Order applies to all GovGuam agencies and encourages the local businesses and the community at large to adopt the name change as well.
Read the Executive Order
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/pdf/exorder.pdf
In addition the Executive order requests lawmakers pass a law re-designating Guam as Guahan.
Written by : Kevin Kerrigan
Monday, 15 February 2010
Guam - As promised in his State of the Island Address, Governor Felix Camacho wasted little time issuing an executive order to change the official name of Guam to Guahan.
His Executive Order applies to all GovGuam agencies and encourages the local businesses and the community at large to adopt the name change as well.
Read the Executive Order
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/pdf/exorder.pdf
In addition the Executive order requests lawmakers pass a law re-designating Guam as Guahan.
Written by : Kevin Kerrigan
Sen B J Cruz with Ray Gibson
Sen B J Cruz with Ray Gibson
Interview between Ray Gibson and Senator B J Cruz about escorting Congress Woman Bordallo at the Legislature for the State of the Congress address. They then talked about the Governor's State of the Island address and what what the senator would like to hear in the Congresswoman's address. They then talked about the Speak Out Telethon for comments about the Draft EIS. They also talked about the Governor changing Guam to Guahan and about the suggestion of reunification between Guam and the CNMI
Click here to download the entire podcast.
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/stories/k57podcasts/feb10/100216_074131.mp3
Interview between Ray Gibson and Senator B J Cruz about escorting Congress Woman Bordallo at the Legislature for the State of the Congress address. They then talked about the Governor's State of the Island address and what what the senator would like to hear in the Congresswoman's address. They then talked about the Speak Out Telethon for comments about the Draft EIS. They also talked about the Governor changing Guam to Guahan and about the suggestion of reunification between Guam and the CNMI
Click here to download the entire podcast.
http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/images/stories/k57podcasts/feb10/100216_074131.mp3
Bordallo delivering speech tonight
Bordallo delivering speech tonight
Posted: Feb 16, 2010 10:13 AM
Updated: Feb 16, 2010 10:13 AM
by Sabrina Salas Matanane
Guam - Guam Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo will be giving her annual address tonight at 6pm. According to her staff, Bordallo is expected to actually begin speaking at 6:30. KUAM will carry her address live on KUAM-TV8 as well as simulcast the speech on Isla63-AM.
Meanwhile, during his own State of the Island Address yesterday... Governor Felix Camacho aside from listing off his accomplishments, said that Guam and the CNMI should see reunification, he also said that he plans to take whatever legal action is necessary to change the name of Guam to "Guahan".
Posted: Feb 16, 2010 10:13 AM
Updated: Feb 16, 2010 10:13 AM
by Sabrina Salas Matanane
Guam - Guam Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo will be giving her annual address tonight at 6pm. According to her staff, Bordallo is expected to actually begin speaking at 6:30. KUAM will carry her address live on KUAM-TV8 as well as simulcast the speech on Isla63-AM.
Meanwhile, during his own State of the Island Address yesterday... Governor Felix Camacho aside from listing off his accomplishments, said that Guam and the CNMI should see reunification, he also said that he plans to take whatever legal action is necessary to change the name of Guam to "Guahan".
Webb in Japan, will visit Guam next
Webb in Japan, will visit Guam next
Posted: Feb 16, 2010 2:26 PM
Updated: Feb 16, 2010 2:26 PM
by Heather Hauswirth
Guam - Virginia senator Jim Webb says he's listening to the views of Japanese leaders and citizens on how to maintain that country's relationship with the United States. Webb met with Japanese media yesterday as he visits Tokyo and Okinawa before coming to Guam.
The U.S. is hoping to settle the contentious issue of the relocation of the Futenma air base. Webb will be on Guam on Thursday and will briefly meet with lawmakers.
Speaker Judi Won Pat says she and her colleagues will only have about two minutes each, adding, "I'm glad to hear that he is going to listen because I know that from his time in terms where his schooling, involvement in the Vietnam War and also his involvement as a senator and as a liaison for Guam that the man is used to taking charge but I think in this case, it'll be a little bit different. We're hoping that he'll listen."
Webb is a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and will meet with lawmakers and the governor as well as military officials.
Posted: Feb 16, 2010 2:26 PM
Updated: Feb 16, 2010 2:26 PM
by Heather Hauswirth
Guam - Virginia senator Jim Webb says he's listening to the views of Japanese leaders and citizens on how to maintain that country's relationship with the United States. Webb met with Japanese media yesterday as he visits Tokyo and Okinawa before coming to Guam.
The U.S. is hoping to settle the contentious issue of the relocation of the Futenma air base. Webb will be on Guam on Thursday and will briefly meet with lawmakers.
Speaker Judi Won Pat says she and her colleagues will only have about two minutes each, adding, "I'm glad to hear that he is going to listen because I know that from his time in terms where his schooling, involvement in the Vietnam War and also his involvement as a senator and as a liaison for Guam that the man is used to taking charge but I think in this case, it'll be a little bit different. We're hoping that he'll listen."
Webb is a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and will meet with lawmakers and the governor as well as military officials.
Camacho: Name change will affirm identity
Camacho: Name change will affirm identity
By Dionesis Tamondong • Pacific Daily News • February 16, 2010
To help mark his legacy as the island's chief executive, Gov. Felix Camacho has called for the formal change of Guam's name to Guåhan.
"As we quickly move into this time of rapid growth and development that may forever change our island, our sense of identity, family and place, it is important that we reaffirm our identity as a people," Camacho said during his State of the Island address yesterday.
The governor issued an executive order for the name change and said he would submit a bill for lawmakers to approve the change.
While some senators supported the renaming proposal, other senators said it amounted to empty symbolism.
Speaker Judith Won Pat said the return to calling the island "Guåhan" could restore some of Guam's lost identity.
"This is the age where, throughout the world, people want to know who they are and find their identity," she said. "This is very important for Guam as well."
Sen. Ben Pangelinan said he supported the name change, but said the Camacho administration hasn't accomplished much in terms of indigenous issues that would back up the symbolic gesture.
He noted the Commission on Self-Determination and the Commission on Decolonization have done little under Camacho's term.
"Self-determination is not changing the name of the island. It's the exercise of our right to vote for what we want to be in terms of our place in the political community of the world," Pangelinan said.
The name "Guåhan" means "we have," said Toni Ramirez, historian for the Guam Historic Preservation Office of the Guam Department of Parks and Recreation.
He said "Guåhan" was an appropriate name for the island because it was blessed with abundant fruits, rivers and many natural resources compared to other islands in Micronesia.
The name was used before 1900, when Guam's first Naval Gov. Richard Leary designated the island as the "Isle of Guam."
Guam Visitors Bureau General Manager Gerry Perez said the name change will require a lot of work from his agency to communicate that change to Guam's visitor markets. But in the long run, he said it can reinforce the island's cultural identity and history, which is already part of the bureau's campaign to show tourists what sets Guam apart from other destinations.
Sen. Eddie Calvo, a gubernatorial candidate in this year's elections, said while the name change could be positive for Guam, the government will have to look at the potential costs and impact of doing so.
Vice Speaker Benjamin Cruz said he thought the name change isn't going to have any major impact. He also said he was disappointed the governor decided to make this his lasting legacy.
"I expected that the legacy was going to be more what he was going to do about the buildup and not about renaming Guam Guåhan," Cruz said. "Sure, it gives us pride in ourselves, but we would have a little more pride if we had a leader that was going to protect us with this upcoming buildup. That would have been more important for me to hear."
Pacific Daily News reporter Brett Kelman contributed to this report.
By Dionesis Tamondong • Pacific Daily News • February 16, 2010
To help mark his legacy as the island's chief executive, Gov. Felix Camacho has called for the formal change of Guam's name to Guåhan.
"As we quickly move into this time of rapid growth and development that may forever change our island, our sense of identity, family and place, it is important that we reaffirm our identity as a people," Camacho said during his State of the Island address yesterday.
The governor issued an executive order for the name change and said he would submit a bill for lawmakers to approve the change.
While some senators supported the renaming proposal, other senators said it amounted to empty symbolism.
Speaker Judith Won Pat said the return to calling the island "Guåhan" could restore some of Guam's lost identity.
"This is the age where, throughout the world, people want to know who they are and find their identity," she said. "This is very important for Guam as well."
Sen. Ben Pangelinan said he supported the name change, but said the Camacho administration hasn't accomplished much in terms of indigenous issues that would back up the symbolic gesture.
He noted the Commission on Self-Determination and the Commission on Decolonization have done little under Camacho's term.
"Self-determination is not changing the name of the island. It's the exercise of our right to vote for what we want to be in terms of our place in the political community of the world," Pangelinan said.
The name "Guåhan" means "we have," said Toni Ramirez, historian for the Guam Historic Preservation Office of the Guam Department of Parks and Recreation.
He said "Guåhan" was an appropriate name for the island because it was blessed with abundant fruits, rivers and many natural resources compared to other islands in Micronesia.
The name was used before 1900, when Guam's first Naval Gov. Richard Leary designated the island as the "Isle of Guam."
Guam Visitors Bureau General Manager Gerry Perez said the name change will require a lot of work from his agency to communicate that change to Guam's visitor markets. But in the long run, he said it can reinforce the island's cultural identity and history, which is already part of the bureau's campaign to show tourists what sets Guam apart from other destinations.
Sen. Eddie Calvo, a gubernatorial candidate in this year's elections, said while the name change could be positive for Guam, the government will have to look at the potential costs and impact of doing so.
Vice Speaker Benjamin Cruz said he thought the name change isn't going to have any major impact. He also said he was disappointed the governor decided to make this his lasting legacy.
"I expected that the legacy was going to be more what he was going to do about the buildup and not about renaming Guam Guåhan," Cruz said. "Sure, it gives us pride in ourselves, but we would have a little more pride if we had a leader that was going to protect us with this upcoming buildup. That would have been more important for me to hear."
Pacific Daily News reporter Brett Kelman contributed to this report.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)