Friday, September 16, 2011

Guam’s ‘Estorian Inalahan’ out, tours planned

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2011 12:00AM BY ZITA TAITANO - Marianas Variety


HAGÅTÑA — For years, Dr. Judy Selk Flores had wanted to contribute back to the community, especially her home village. All that is now a reality with the publication of her book, “Estorian Inalahan.”

Dr. Judy Selk Flores speaks to guests during the launch of her book “Estorian Inalahan” last Friday at the Lujan House compound in Hagåtña. Looking on is Rosanna Barcinas of the Guam Preservation Trust. Photo by Zita Y. Taitano

A book-launching ceremony was held recently at the Lujan House in Hagåtña for Flores’ book. Friends, family members and residents of Inalahan gathered to celebrate with her.

Flores said her book started with her master’s thesis, which she based on the arts and the culture of Guam back in 1995. She continued with the theme as she worked on her Ph.D. But getting everything together for the book wasn’t easy, especially when it came to cost.

“The Guam Preservation Trust helped me through those years with a very generous grant, but to get it published is just so expensive. This year I was able to get funding from the Spanish Program for Cultural Cooperation from the Spanish government which gives grants to document the Spanish era in the Pacific,” she said.

Although the book contains information about the history of Guam and the Chamorro people, Flores focused on Inalahan and the people.

“One of the things that fascinated me was the village of Pa’a which was wiped out,” she said.

In her studies, she discovered that the chief of Pa’a at the time was Choco, a man from China who, according to her book, was cast ashore and lived among the villagers for 20 years. Records indicate he lived in Inalahan when Padre Luis San Vitores arrived on Guam. Choco was reportedly known to be influential with the Chamorros in going against the Spanish.

She also learned another important piece of information about Pa’a village.

“What I found through talking with archaeologists is that the ancient village of Pa’a is where my house is now and that was really exciting,” she said.

The site is along the beach. There is a lot nearby set aside for an archaeological field school.

Stories

Other items featured are stories she heard while growing up in the village including Pale Jesus Baza Duenas who was tortured and beheaded by the Japanese for hiding George Tweed, a sailor who kept out of sight for nearly two years thanks to several Chamorros like Pale Duenas. Tweed managed to escape just before the liberation of the island occurred.

The book also contains stories of families including the Flores, Leon Guerrero and San Nicolas families.

In the meantime, Flores admits she isn’t done with her projects just yet.

“From this book, I’m working on opening a museum in one of the historic houses in Inalahan. We want to develop San Jose Street as a tourist spot. They already have the paintings there from last summer,” she said, referring to murals on the historic homes in the main street of the village.

Additionally, Flores will also be working with tour agents to bring tourists down south to walk around some of the historic homes.

“Estorian Inalahan” is on sale for $39 at Framed Etc. Call 477-7873 for more information. The store is located in Anigua on the ground floor of the New Marina Hotel just off Marine Corps Drive.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Is Poverty a Death Sentence?

Published on Wednesday, September 14, 2011 by CommonDreams.org

By Bernie Sanders

The crisis of poverty in America is one of the great moral and economic issues facing our country. It is very rarely talked about in the mainstream media. It gets even less attention in Congress. Why should people care? Many poor people don't vote. They certainly don't make large campaign contributions, and they don't have powerful lobbyists representing their interests.US Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

Here's why we all should care. There are 46 million Americans -- about one in six -- living below the poverty line. That's the largest number on record, according to anew report released Tuesday by the Census Bureau. About 49.9 million Americans lacked health insurance, the report also said. That number has soared by 13.3 million since 2000.

Moreover, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United States has both the highest overall poverty rate and the highest childhood poverty rate of any major industrialized country on earth. This comes at a time when the U.S. also has the most unequal distribution of wealth and income of any major country on earth with the top 1 percent earning more than the bottom 50 percent.

According to the latest figures from the OECD, 21.6 percent of American children live in poverty. This compares to 3.7 percent in Denmark, 5 percent in Finland, 5.5 percent in Norway 6.9 percent in Slovenia, 7 percent in Sweden, 7.2 percent Hungary, 8.3 percent in Germany, 8.8 percent in the Czech Republic, 9.3 percent in France, 9.4 percent in Switzerland. I suppose we can take some comfort in that our numbers are not quite as bad as Turkey (23.5 percent), Chile (24 percent) and Mexico (25.8 percent).

When we talk about poverty in America, we think about people who may be living in substandard and overcrowded homes or may be homeless. We think about people who live with food insecurity, who may not know how they are going to feed themselves or their kids tomorrow. We think about people who, in cold states like Vermont, may not have enough money to purchase the fuel they need to keep warm in the winter. We think about people who cannot afford health insurance or access to medical care. We think about people who cannot afford an automobile or transportation, and can't get to their job or the grocery store. We think about senior citizens who may have to make a choice between buying the prescription drugs he or she needs, or purchasing an adequate supply of food.

I want to focus on an enormously important point. And that is that poverty in America today leads not only to anxiety, unhappiness, discomfort and a lack of material goods. It leads to death. Poverty in America today is a death sentence for tens and tens of thousands of our people which is why the high childhood poverty rate in our country is such an outrage.

Some facts:

• At a time when we are seeing major medical breakthroughs in cancer and other terrible diseases for the people who can afford those treatments, the reality is that life expectancy for low-income women has declined over the past 20 years in 313 counties in our country. In other words, in some areas of America, women are now dying at a younger age than they used to.

• In America today, people in the highest income group level, the top 20 percent, live, on average, at least 6.5 years longer than those in the lowest income group. Let me repeat that. If you are poor in America you will live 6.5 years less than if you are wealthy or upper-middle class.

• In America today, adult men and women who have graduated from college can expect tolive at least 5 years longer than people who have not finished high school.

• In America today tens of thousands of our fellow citizens die unnecessarily because they cannot get the medical care they need. According to Reuters (September 17, 2009), nearly 45,000 people die in the United States each year -- one every 12 minutes -- in large part because they lack health insurance and cannot get good care. Harvard Medical School researchers found in an analysis released on Thursday."

• In 2009, the infant mortality rate for African American infants was twice that of white infants.

I recite these facts because I believe that as bad as the current situation is with regard to poverty, it will likely get worse in the immediate future. As a result of the greed, recklessness and illegal behavior of Wall Street we are now in the midst of the worst economic downturn since the 1930s. Millions of workers have lost their jobs and have slipped out of the middle class and into poverty. Poverty is increasing.

Further, despite the reality that our deficit problem has been caused by the recession and declining revenue, two unpaid for wars and tax breaks for the wealthy, there are some in Congress who wish to decimate the existing safety net which provides a modicum of security for the elderly, the sick, the children and lower income people. Despite an increase in poverty, some of these people would like to cut or end Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, home heating assistance, nutrition programs and help for the disabled and the homeless.

To the degree that they are successful, there is no question in my mind that many more thousands of men, women and children will die.

From a moral perspective, it is not acceptable that we allow so much unnecessary suffering and preventable death to continue. From an economic perspective and as we try to fight our way out of this terrible recession, it makes no sense that we push to the fringe so many people who could be of such great help to us.

Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2006 after serving 16 years in the House of Representatives. He is the longest serving independent member of Congress in American history. Elected Mayor of Burlington, Vt., by 10 votes in 1981, he served four terms. Before his 1990 election as Vermont's at-large member in Congress, Sanders lectured at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and at Hamilton College in upstate New York. Read more at his website.


Adelup officials violate Mini-Hatch Act

FRIDAY, 16 SEPTEMBER 2011 08:25 BY THERESE HART | VARIETY NEWS STAFF

AN EMAIL sent by Governor Eddie Baza Calvo’s Chief of Staff Franklin Arriola and Special Assistant Jadeen Tuncap on Sept. 14 urging political appointees of the governor and Cabinet members to attend Republican Senator Chris Duenas’ lunch fundraiser and a Guam War Survivors Memorial Foundation fundraiser sponsored by Senator Frank Blas Jr., yesterday, is in violation of the Mini-Hatch Act.

The message was sent by Arriola and Tuncap using their government of Guam email account, and was sent to GovGuam email accounts of Cabinet members and Executive appointees.

The email message read: “Cabinet Members and Senior Staff: Senator (Frank) Blas and Senator (Chris) Duenas were staunch supporters of Governor Calvo’s budget and bond proposals. They were intimately involved and engaged with Governor Calvo throughout this difficult, but hugely successful, endeavor. It is imperative that all of us reciprocate the support, Governor Calvo, Lt. Governor Tenorio and I look forward to seeing all of you at these two fine events. Frank.”
Arriola spoke to Variety and said he was very apologetic and it was a mistake.

“As far as the issue at hand, I wanted to make a comment on that. I’m a good guy. When I did this, it did not dawn on me at all. As I looked and I thought about it, I made a mistake, no question about it. For the public, I apologize. I’m sorry. The people of Guam deserve the truth. I made a mistake and if I offended anyone, I’m sorry.”

Troy Torres, the governor’s director of communications, said: “After looking at the law, it appears this is a Mini-Hatch violation and it’s something that was an honest mistake Frank made. Frank thought that because he was sending this only to political appointees and Cabinet members, that he was following the Mini-Hatch Act.”

Torres added: “He used his personal computer to send this out, he didn’t realize that sending it from his email account that he used was in violation of the Mini-Hatch Act. He is very apologetic for that.”

The law


Under 4 Guam Code Annotated, Chapter 5, prohibited activity, specific activity in which employees are prohibited from participating include, but are not limited to: organizing, selling tickets to, seeking support for or actively participating in a fund-raising activity of a political party, partisan political organization or candidate.

Another section of the law states it is illegal for employees to use government supplies or government facilities for the benefit of any political party, partisan political organization or candidate, and this includes the government of Guam’s email system.

The law further reads that whether a GovGuam employee or not, no person can solicit or receive a contribution or distribute literature for any political purpose in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties by any person employed by the Executive, Legislative or Judicial Branches of the government. Soliciting a contribution includes solicitation by letter or circular address to and delivered to an employee in said room or building. Any person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor.

Anyone who believes an employee has violated the Mini-Hatch Act should report the matter to the Civil Service Commission, who will decide whether the alleged violation warrants an investigation.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Students protest against UOG tuition hike

WEDNESDAY, 14 SEPTEMBER 2011 04:49 BY GERALDINE CASTILLO | VARIETY NEWS STAFF

EMOTIONS ran high for students yesterday as they diplomatically voiced their opposition against the University of Guam's proposed tuition rate increase.

A public hearing organized by UOG President Robert Underwood and the Board of Regent's Budget, Finance, Investments and Audit Committee and the Student Affairs, Scholarship, Alumni Relations and Honorary Degree Committee was held yesterday at the School of Business and Public Administration Building.

Nearly 100 students filled the room to support one another as some took the opportunity to present their views and arguments before the board.

Proposed changes to the university's tuition rates include a 10 percent increase to resident undergraduate and graduate students beginning Spring 2012, with a 5 percent increase in Fall 2012, and another 5 percent again in Fall 2013.

The current resident undergraduate tuition rate per credit hour is $190. With the proposed 10 percent increase for Spring 2012, the new cost would amount to $209; by Fall 2012, $220; and in Fall 2013, $231.

For non-residents, the rates would decrease in Spring 2012 and then increase 5 percent in each of the next two academic years.

Since Fall 2009 to current, tuition for non-resident undergraduates cost $565. By implementing the new rates by Spring 2012, tuition would drop to $435, then increase to $457 by Fall 2012, and again to $480 by Fall 2013.

Shortage

The tuition changes stem from a shortage in the amount the government appropriated for the university's budget for next fiscal year.

According to Vice President of Administration and Finance David O'Brien, UOG had requested a $29.9 million appropriation for FY2012 general operations. The Legislature, in turn, came up with Substitute Bill 145-31, which appropriates only $26.7 million. This leaves the university short $3.2 million.

In order to meet the budget cut, O'Brien said the university estimated $1.9 million to come from cost-reduction and energy-conservation measures. They also are contemplating salary cuts.

To fill in the remaining $1.3 million gap, UOG proposed the tuition increase. According to the UOG Proposal for Tuition Rate Changes and Economic Impact Statement, the increase in tuition is to also accommodate the growth in student enrollment.

“Revenue generated by the proposed tuition increase will benefit academic quality and support student learning,” the proposal and EIS stated.

Protest

Minutes before the public hearing, dozens of students rallied together with posters. Organized by FITE Club – Fellows for Inquiry Towards Enlightenment – the student activist group wanted to make clear that despite their struggles, they were willing to compromise.

“We hope to find solutions to mitigate our financial situation,” said FITE Club President Kenneth Gofigan Kuper. The 20-year-old senior majoring in Psychology insisted, “We're willing to compromise ... we're not necessarily here to say no to everything.”

The students then began their march, hoping to later echo their rhetoric during the public hearing.

“We are here to listen to your opinion ... we're not only asking for your understanding but your assistance,” said President Underwood to the students.

Earlier, Underwood stated that in order to avoid a tuition increase, the university needs to secure additional support from the government of Guam either through legislative appropriation or reprogramming by the government.

“I'm so glad that you're here today, in helping make the case and the university's case ... not only in your name, but in the name of educational opportunity for incoming students,” Underwood told the students.

Over a dozen students each voiced their concerns with passion and conviction.

“I'm not a math major, but I know we're short,” said 20-year-old student and junior Jesse Quenga. “And because we're short, that's why we're seeing that the $1.3 million is gonna come out of somewhere, but why does it have to come out of our pockets?”

Quenga, who is also president of the 60th Student Government Association, spoke matter-of-factly on behalf of all the students.

“We're just one demographic ... we're just one student who's probably a single parent, who's probably working three jobs, who's probably trying their best to prove to their parents ... that this is the best decision for now,” he said. “What they need to remember is that this is an investment – an investment that we're going to see later on in the future.”

Not only did the students highlight the reality of their economic or personal struggles, they also proposed suggestions and solutions in hopes to find compromise. Among those suggestions was the idea of utilizing e-books or making textbooks available online instead of purchasing expensive textbooks. Another suggestion was influencing a more sustainable culture at the campus, and finding more ways to be more efficient.

“If education is so vital, if education is such a staple to success, then allow us to absorb that success,” Kuper urged the board. “Provide us that opportunity to pave the road to success. ... Let us know that you are doing your part as well.”

Monday, September 12, 2011

Coral Reefs 'Will Be Gone by End of the Century

Published on Sunday, September 11, 2011 by the Independent/UK

They will be the first entire ecosystem to be destroyed by human activity, says top UN scientist
by Andrew Marszal

Coral reefs are on course to become the first ecosystem that human activity will eliminate entirely from the Earth, a leading United Nations scientist claims. He says this event will occur before the end of the present century, which means that there are children already born who will live to see a world without coral.

Australia's Great Barrier Reef is the planet's largest reef system and one of the seven natural wonders of the world, but it may not survive the century.The claim is made in a book published tomorrow, which says coral reef ecosystems are very likely to disappear this century in what would be "a new first for mankind – the 'extinction' of an entire ecosystem". Its author, Professor Peter Sale, studied the Great Barrier Reef for 20 years at the University of Sydney. He currently leads a team at the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health.

The predicted decline is mainly down to climate change and ocean acidification, though local activities such as overfishing, pollution and coastal development have also harmed the reefs. The book, Our Dying Planet, published by University of California Press, contains further alarming predictions, such as the prospect that "we risk having no reefs that resemble those of today in as little as 30 or 40 more years".

"We're creating a situation where the organisms that make coral reefs are becoming so compromised by what we're doing that many of them are going to be extinct, and the others are going to be very, very rare," Professor Sale says. "Because of that, they aren't going to be able to do the construction which leads to the phenomenon we call a reef. We've wiped out a lot of species over the years. This will be the first time we've actually eliminated an entire ecosystem."

Coral reefs are important for the immense biodiversity of their ecosystems. They contain a quarter of all marine species, despite covering only 0.1 per cent of the world's oceans by area, and are more diverse even than the rainforests in terms of diversity per acre, or types of different phyla present.

Recent research into coral reefs' highly diverse and unique chemical composition has found many compounds useful to the medical industry, which could be lost if present trends persist. New means of tackling cancer developed from reef ecosystems have been announced in the past few months, including a radical new treatment for leukemia derived from a reef-dwelling sponge. Another possible application of compounds found in coral as a powerful sunblock has also been mooted.

And coral reefs are of considerable economic value to humans, both as abundant fishing resources and – often more lucratively – as tourist destinations. About 850 million people live within 100km of a reef, of which some 275 million are likely to depend on the reef ecosystems for nutrition or livelihood. Fringing reefs can also help to protect low-lying islands and coastal regions from extreme weather, absorbing waves before they reach vulnerable populations.

Carbon emissions generated by human activity, especially our heavy use of fossils fuels, are the biggest cause of the anticipated rapid decline, impacting on coral reefs in two main ways. Climate change increases ocean surface temperatures, which have already risen by 0.67C in the past century. This puts corals under enormous stress and leads to coral bleaching, where the photosynthesising algae on which the reef-building creatures depend for energy disappear. Deprived of these for even a few weeks, the corals die.

On top of this comes ocean acidification. Roughly one-third of the extra carbon dioxide we put into the atmosphere is absorbed through the ocean surface, acidifying shallower waters. A more recently recognized problem in tropical reef systems, the imbalance created makes it harder for reef organisms to retrieve the minerals needed to build their carbonaceous skeletons. "If they can't build their skeletons – or they have to put a lot more energy into building them relative to all the other things they need to do, like reproduce – it has a detrimental effect on the coral reefs," says Paul Johnston of the University of Exeter, and founder of the UK's Greenpeace Research Laboratories.

An important caveat to the book's predictions is that the corals themselves – the tiny organisms largely responsible for creating reefs – may be lucky enough to survive the destruction, if past mass extinction episodes are anything to go by. "Although corals are ancient animals and have been around for hundreds of millions of years, there have been periods of reefs, and periods where there are no reefs," explains Mark Spalding, of the US-based environmental group Nature Conservancy, and the University of Cambridge. "When climatic conditions are right they build these fantastic structures, but when they're not they wait in the wings, in little refuges, as a rather obscure invertebrate."

The gaps between periods in which reefs are present have been long even in geological terms, described in the book as "multimillion-year pauses". And reef disappearance has tended to precede wider mass extinction events, offering an ominous "canary in the environmental coal mine" for the present day, according to the author. "People have been talking about current biodiversity loss as the Holocene mass extinction, meaning that the losses of species that are occurring now are in every way equivalent to the mass extinctions of the past," Professor Sale says. "I think there is every possibility that is what we are seeing."

About 20 per cent of global coral reefs have already been lost in the past few decades. Mass bleaching events leading to widespread coral death are a relatively recent phenomenon; though scientists have been studying coral reefs in earnest since the 1950s, mass bleaching was first observed only in 1983.

Dr Spalding, who witnessed the catastrophic 1998 mass bleaching in the Indian Ocean first-hand, says: "It was a shocking wake-up call for the world of science, and a shocking wake-up for me to be actually there as we watched literally 80 to 90 per cent of all the corals die on the reefs of the Seychelles and other islands in a few weeks." That single event destroyed 16 per cent of the world's coral.

But according to the book's author: "The 1998 bleaching was spectacular because it was so extensive and so conspicuous. But there have been mass bleachings that have been global since then: 2005 was bad; 2010 was bad. The visual appearance is not nearly as severe as it was in 1998, simply because there is less coral around."

These dramatic episodes coincide with unusual weather patterns such as El Niño, but are increasing in severity and frequency due to climate change. As such, tackling global warming is the most urgent solution advocated by the book. "If we can keep CO2 concentrations below 450 parts per million we would be able to save something resembling coral reefs," Professor Sale says. "They wouldn't be the coral reefs of the 1950s or 1960s, but they would be recognizably coral reefs, and they would function as reefs." The current atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is about 390 parts per million, but few experts believe it will remain below 500 for long.

There are signs that local conservation efforts can make a difference. Alex Rogers, professor of conservation biology at Oxford University, says: "We know for certain that corals subject to low levels of stress are much more able to recover. So if you take away pressures like overfishing of coral reefs and pollution, this has profound effects on recovery. But what we're really doing is buying time for many of these ecosystems. If climate change continues at its current rate, they will be done for eventually."

Though not all scientists agree with the precise timescales set out by the book, the crisis is clear. "When you're talking about the destruct-ion of an entire ecosystem within one human generation, there might be some small differences in the details – it is a dramatic image and a dramatic statement," Professor Rogers says. "But the overall message we agree with. People are not taking on board the sheer speed of the changes we're seeing."

'Our Dying Planet' (University of California Press) will be published in North America tomorrow